Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "snmp_device_t".
Did you mean:
sccp_device_t
2011 Jun 21
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r3048 - branches/nut-scanner/tools/nut-scanner
...'"';
> + memcpy(buf+1,response->variables->val.string,
> + response->variables->val_len);
> + buf[1+response->variables->val_len] = '"';
> add_option_to_device(dev,"desc",buf);
> add_option_to_device(dev,"mibs",snmp_device_table[index].mib);
> /* SNMP v3 */
What is the reason to switch from the (buffer overflow) safe
'snprintf' method to the above unsafe way of doing this? I'm not too
thrilled about this. If you want to copy
'response->variables->val_len' bytes, the proper way to...