search for: sneaks

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15990 Summary: Can't play Fedora 9 sneap prview video from ustream.com: Can't play Fedora 9 sneak prview video from ustream.com Product: swfdec Version: 0.6.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: medium

I just re-integrated fixdeleting.rb, the last of the post-processors. Running minimal.rb no longer segfaults on exit. Running dialogs.rb and immediately exiting doesn''t segfault, but bringing up a dialog and then exiting does. So there are still memory problems, but fewer than yesterday :-/ I''m not sure how it compares to last week. I probably won''t have much time

Is the logging system thread-safe? I have a process that takes about 5 hours, and twice, it has stopped, giving me no errors at all... but the process hasnt been finished... The second time, I loaded the status page, and it gave me a 500 error, at the same time the process stopped. I have a sneaking suspicion that the cause is two processes trying to write to the log-file at the same

Am 23.07.2014 11:44, schrieb Daniel Vetter: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote: >> The scheduler needs to keep track of a lot of fences, so I think we'll >> have to register callbacks, not a simple wait function. We must keep >> track of all the non-i915 fences for all oustanding batches. Also, the >> scheduler

Hi, On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 13 December 2014 at 09:49, İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote: >> With trunk things got even worse while compiling a simple hello world cpp: >> >> 1. /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/4.9/../../../../include/c++/4.9/bits/basic_string.h:114:57: >> current

I've been considering the nature of Asterisk, its security, the bug tracker, and more... And i've come up with an interesting idea: A "message of the version". The idea is that Asterisk has a compile time 32-bit unsigned int version which is incremented whenever some major new bug is fixed. When Asterisk starts up (and periodically, maybe once per day), it sends a packet with

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com> wrote: > Am 23.07.2014 11:30, schrieb Daniel Vetter: > >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Christian K?nig >> <christian.koenig at amd.com> wrote: >>> >>> You submit a job to the hardware and then block the job to wait for >>> radeon >>> to be finished?

Hi all, We've just had a paper accepted for publication in Nature. We used R for 95% of our analyses (one of my co-authors sneaked in some GenStat when I wasn't looking.). The preprint is available from the Nature web site, in the open peer-review trial section. I searched Nature for previous references to "R Development Core Team", and I received no hits. So I tentatively

(bcc a few lists) Hello, For tomorrow's bi-weekly meeting [0][1], we have two guest presentations: Prof. Mathieu Acher, an associate professor from the University of Rennes, will be discussing with us about the Linux kernel's configuration space. A common question we get is "does the kernel build with Clang?" "Depends on the config" is just the tip of the iceberg.

Nadav, I believe aligned accesses to unaligned pointers is precisely the issue. Consider the function `add_u8S` before[1] and after[2] the loop vectorizer pass. There is no alignment assumption associated with %kernel_data prior to vectorization. I can't tell if it's the loop vectorizer or the codegen at fault, but the alignment assumption seems to sneak in somewhere. v/r, Josh [1]

> On Jul 21, 2020, at 14:30, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > >> On Jul 21, 2020, at 11:50 AM, Jonathan Roelofs via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> A question of preference came up in https://reviews.llvm.org/D83588 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D83588>

Can anyone tell me the trick for obtaining the smoother matrix from smooth.spline when there are non-unique values for x. I have the following code but, of course, it only works when all values of x are unique. ## get the smoother matrix (x having unique values smooth.matrix = function(x, df){ n = length(x); A = matrix(0, n, n); for(i in 1:n){ y = rep(0, n); y[i]=1; yi =

Am Sa., 8. Juni 2019 um 13:12 Uhr schrieb Tim Northover via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > I'd prefer us to have something neater than static_cast<int> for the > loop problem before we made that change. Perhaps add an ssize (or > equivalent) method to all of our internal data structures? They're a > lot more common than std::* containers. +1 Since C++20

Ilia Mirkin wrote: > I suspect the fb0 issue is because you disabled > CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION? Does the freeze also happen with 4.3? Any > chance you could bisect? I saw this config option, but I didn't realize that. The issue also occurs with 4.3. I even tried 4.3-rc1 with the same results. Would the DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION effect 3D? > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Wakko

Something like: index 6db7f68..68564cb 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp @@ -1208,6 +1208,8 @@ void InnerLoopVectorizer::vectorizeMemoryInstruction(Instr Type *DataTy = VectorType::get(ScalarDataTy, VF); Value *Ptr = LI ? LI->getPointerOperand() : SI->getPointerOperand(); unsigned Alignment = LI ?

That's odd, seems a spam or phish sneaked through to the list. NOT from me :) Jim On Wed, Mar 23, 2022, 21:38 Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser via Nut-upsuser < nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote: > Hello again, > Please find lower the overall documentation: > > > >

I'm in the same situation James is in and thus have the same bias but I'll +1 that comment nevertheless. I think I prefer using size_t or the uintX_t types where applicable. Only when I need a signed value do I use one. On Mon, Jun 10, 2019, 9:59 AM James Henderson via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Maybe it's just because I work in code around the binary

Hi Eli: >> Block1: >> %0 = call i8 coro.suspend() >> switch i8 %0, label suspend1 [i8 0 %return] ; or icmp + br i1 >> Suspend1: >> switch i8 %0, label %resume1 [i8 1 %destroy1] ; or icmp + br i1 >> >> This doesn't look right: intuitively the suspend happens after the return >> block runs. Perhaps, but, that is not the intended

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Nipun Arora <nipun2512 at gmail.com> wrote: > Essentially I would like to extract the control flow graph representation > with function names (eg. _mm_cvtsi32_si128) instead of the functions being > replaced by 'llvm.*' > Is there anyway to extract these names directly as function calls? The names disappear in an unrecoverable way once

> [diff attached] Updated diff with test fix. (since this broke a test (printing chars as numerical values, rather than characters) it's possible this change is a bad idea & it could break the product code itself. Though strangely I wasn't able to do character concatenation without my change, so I have a sneaking suspicion that while the test passed, it didn't actually expose