search for: snats

hi, there was some email problems and i repeat my question too fast, but this is the second part of my questions. - only the rules and policy files give access right? ie. rules in the FORWARD chain of the filter table in iptables ? - is a line in masq file automaticaly add an accept rule too? eg. in msaq file eth0 <internal ip> allow connection from <internal ip> (local zona) to the

Hi, Could not conceive an working set-up for an IPSEC VPN made with racoon/setkey on which I have one address on my side acting as an SNAT router for all traffic from my network to a network segment on the far side. my network --- my gateway ---------------------- remote network 10.0.0.0/24 - 10.0.0.1 (10.253.0.2) -- tunnel - 192.168.0.0/22 All traffic starts on my side, so if I can

Hello everybody. I''m running linux 2.6.19 with nth match to alternatively snat outgoing connections to two different ip addresses for load balancing between two adsl lines: Here is: $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s my_ip --protocol tcp -m multiport --dports 80,443 -m statistic --mode nth --every 2 -j SNAT --to adslA $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s my_ip --protocol tcp -m multiport

Hi ! I have setup a complete shorewall now with DMZ, and Private zones and masq, rules, port-forwarding etc. worx like expected. BUT I have a wish to use a couple of more public IP''s and relate those to inernal servers on the DMZ zone and i am now so confused about it. I have searched this archive for SNAT port allow Setup: 3 public adresses on the WAN nic. lets call them 80.80.80.80 -

More than one of our docs issues revolve around some confusion between "IP masquerading" and "SNAT" -- a confusion I might share, or if contagious, I may be catching. <g> I think of SNAT more or less as a special case of IP masquerading, applicable when, for example, the external interface has multiple IP''s and you choose to _explicitly_ set the address through

snat not working my local ip is aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa asterisk sitting on the internet at ip bbb.bbb.bbb.bbb my firewall''s internal ip is 192.168.0.254 i did snat: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -j SNAT --to aaa.aaa.aaa iptables -t nat -L -v gives: Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 23663 packets, 2182K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 33056

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1227 Bug ID: 1227 Summary: Current conntrack state isn't considered when evaluating multiple SNAT rules Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

Dear All, I have configured Cluster Suite with 2 servers Server 1 : 192.168.13.110 IP Address Server 2 : 192.168.13.179 IP Address Floating : 192.168.13.83 IP Address (Assumed by currently active server) I want all snmp packets going out through the active server to be stamped with floating IP So i have added a iptables rules as "iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -p udp -s

Hi guys, Can you take a look at this? :) +-----------+ | | eth1-|- | | -|-eth0---LAN--- | | eth2-|- | | | +-----------+ - eth0 is connected to the LAN having the IP=LAN_IP eth1 is connected to the first ISP having IP=ISP_IP_1 and GW=ISP_GW_1 eth2 is connected to the second ISP having IP=ISP_IP_2 and GW=ISP_GW_2 I need

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=554 ------- Additional Comments From fhagur@gmail.com 2007-04-17 05:04 MET ------- I have been wondering about this bug and had similar problems myself here in my Debian system, linux-kernel 2.6.18 iptables 1.3.6. I too saw that some packets became transmitted illegally through the ppp0 interface, when they just shoudn't. What I

Hi all, I''m using Shorewall since one year (1.4, then 2.0) I''m trying to migrate a linux firewall from iptables rules to shorewall. The firewall has three zones - net internet - loc1 lan - loc2 second lan I have a lot of rules like this, to SNAT the ip addresses of some computers on loc1 (192.168.16.0/24) when they connect to loc2 (10.0.0.0/8) iptables -v -t nat -I

Hi, I configured a router box to use 2 providers, as described in the HOWTO. (Apendix 1) I want to use both links to reach a single smtp server. As I read in the kptd and in some old messages of this list, doing a SNAT in the postrouting chain comes _after_ the routing desision. So I guess the following lines I''m trying to use are wrong. (See Apendix 1) What can I do to have multiple

Sorry for the long descritpion of the problem, I''d like to know If I misunderstand something or if I meet an intrinsic limit of my setup. 217.58.51.162 HDSL eth1 - SRV_XP: 192.168.254.10 eth0: 192.168.254.1 -----+------------------+------- 81.121.243.250 ADSL eth3 - I want to allow incoming pptp request (port 1723) to be forwarded to srv_xp

Hi gurus, I need a way to do SNAT based on source mac before routing. This is because hosts attached to my gateway can have duplicate IP addresses, and I have to distinguish over them. I tried to use the nat tool that comes with iproute2, but this force to make a mapping only address to address, and I wanted to do it by mark (I also use iptables to do that). For example, I tried to

Hello I will briefly draw the situation Router with one interface eth0 , to local network 10.123.0.0/16 on a local network ADSL modem with IP 10.123.10.11 I want to use 10.123.10.11 as a connection to internet . Because of that I have created default route "ip route add default via 10.123.10.11 dev eth0" I do not want my ADSL modem to do NATing , since it shows to be slow. I have

Hello all, I have shorewall setup with 3 SNAT entries for external IP address''s to a single IP internal address. I am wondering how to limit access based on the source IP address. ex. EXT IP 1 access only to port 25 EXT IP 2 access only to port 443 EXT IP 3 access only to port 80 I have the SNAT setup correctly and I have 3 accept line in the rules file (25,80,443) but I can hit

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=554 Summary: Packet illegaly bypassing SNAT Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

I am having problems making RTSP connections to a Windows Streaming Media Server (ie "connecting to media...." but WMP never connects). There are no error messages in /var/log/messages. It was suggested to me that SNAT might perform better than MASQ in this respect. I edited my shorewall/masq file as such: eth0 eth1 12.34.56.78 or should it be? eth0 10.0.0.0/24

Hi, I want to have several IP''s for my connection and each IP will have it''s own hostname. Now I want to serve a web server and mail server for each hostname/IP_addr pair on the same box in the internal LAN using one apache and one postfix daemon. If I do one SNAT and several DNATs then only the hostname which I SNAT the server to would work. Is the only way to do it

Has anyone managed to combine bridged network model and SNAT? I have a machine that just ssh''s into other boxes and updates via rsync a copy of their filesystems. I figured I could stage a xen VM for this server with a private IP address and do SNAT and "routing" via the dom0 box, but I get a wierd "Performing cross-bridge DNAT requires IP forwarding to be enabled"