search for: snarki

Hi, Why is it that polymorphic associations only work with the :has_many and :belongs_to relationships? Why can''t it be a :has_one? Matt

So is yours. Why not say what SHOULD be done? Since we were discussing logging, including only the lines about logging seem to be a reasonable response to the original open-ended question. ?Please include the complete output of ?dovecot -n?? would get your point across instead of just letting you be a snarky ass. On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:14 PM Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo at gmail.com>

On Jan 17, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >>>> On Thu,

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > On 09/13/2017 02:16 AM, C Bergström wrote: > > A completely non-technical point, but what's the current "polly" license? > Does integrating that code conflict in any way with the work being done to > relicense llvm? > > > Good question. I discussed this explicitly with

Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: > greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > >> Hmm...it's a build system, right? There's not much to add, really. >> Build systems should be really simple. All they need is dependencies >> and rules to build stuff. > > Oh, yes, sure, you're right. <g> Can't tell if you're being

Chayan Sarkar wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to write a small pass. In my pass, I have inserted some > instruction and used that in another. But, during OPT it is showing > "Instruction does not dominate all uses" like following - > > %b.1 = bitcast i32 4 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=8] %11 > = add i32 %a.1, %b.1 ;

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > On 09/13/2017 06:53 AM, C Bergström wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > >> >> On 09/13/2017 02:16 AM, C Bergström wrote: >> >> A completely non-technical point, but what's the current "polly"

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 17, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >>>

Hi, I am trying to write a small pass. In my pass, I have inserted some instruction and used that in another. But, during OPT it is showing "Instruction does not dominate all uses" like following - %b.1 = bitcast i32 4 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=8] %11 = add i32 %a.1, %b.1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]Instruction does not dominate all uses! Any

I''m stymied at how to create a fixture that establishes a has_many :through relationship. I''ve watched the railscast at: http://media.railscasts.com/videos/081_fixtures_in_rails_2.mov ... but that''s for HABTM relationships. I''ve read: http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/145676 but that ultimately doesn''t answer any question. So with no further ado:

Hi Dmitry, Where were you expecting notice to have been given? If I recall correctly, the obsolescence of the C backend was mentioned many times on this mailing list, and as Owen notes, in the release notes since 2.8. I'm not trying to be snarky. You were obviously genuinely surprised by its removal, and that makes me wonder if where the core open source devs are expecting people to look for

On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 12:14?PM Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2/25/23 07:50, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:01 AM Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> wrote: > >> > >> On 24.02.23 12:58, Keine Eile wrote: > >>> does any one of you have a best practice on renewing ssh host keys on >

Yes, but in your example getenv is called every time enableFooBar needs to be initialized. What if your code is itself wrapped inside another loop you can't see (for example, the PassManager invoking passes)? Maybe I'm being overly pedantic. We use a lot of environment variables in our compiler because it's really super annoying and takes a lot of developer time to have to update

Ok, thanks! I'm not dealing with UTF-8 so I don't think Process::GetEnv will work. I was looking for something that caches calls to getenv so checks could be put into tight(-ish) loops without too much performance impact. Would such a utility be of interest to the community? -David Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >

Dear Jim and Owen, Thanks for replies, I only kindly suggest some discussion on the maillist in such cases. Just in general, nasty precedents sometimes happen, for example on IRC I've recently seen some commits to Objective C were requested to be reverted, because they were commited without any discussion. Here things are certainly not that hard, but the point is the same: it is always nice

Dear all, I've also noticed C backend was removed a little bit... silently. In the end of March I only got open bugs closed by Benjamin Kramer in bugzilla, but they sounded like "decision is made". So the question is: it such silent removal a normal practice? In times of 3.0 release there were long discussions on what to drop and what to preserve, e.g. sparc backend, if I remember

The "good reason" is all the tooling in R doesn't work with subfolders and would have to be rewritten. All the package check and build stuff. And that's assuming you don't want to change the basic flat package structure - for example to allow something like `library(foo)` to attach a package and `library(foo.bar)` to attach some subset of package `foo`. That would require

Hi-- Am having trouble with rvm. Successfully installed it, but when I tried to install Ruby 1.8.7, here is the error I got: Paul-Denlingers-MacBook-Pro:~ pdenlinger$ rvm install 1.8.7 -bash: rvm: command not found Tried closing terminal, quitting terminal, opening another tab, etc. but continued to get same error. What to do? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Env vars that change compiler output make it impossible to write tools such as ccache or distcc. Including the entire env in the hash value that determines whether ccache has a cache hit (as well as the compiler command line and the preprocessed source file) would be ridiculous and would result in very few cache hits. On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Matthias Braun via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at

A quick drive-by-comment: What if 'R CMD build' would have an option to flatten R/ subfolders when building the tarball, e.g. R/unix/a.R R/windows/a.R R/a.R becomes: R/00__unix__a.R R/00__windows__a.R R/a.R ? Maybe that would be sufficient for most use cases. The only thing I can imagine is that source file references (e.g. in check NOTEs) will be toward the latter and not the