search for: snappier

Hi, Is it me or is CentOS 5 faster than FC6? I just switched and it seems that CentOS 5 loads faster and overall feels snappier. Could Red Hat have optimzed EL more than Fedora?. Just curious. I really like what I see with CentOS 5. The devs have done a great job making a profesisonal looking distro. An of course kudos to Red Hat for all the engineering and for making the SRPMS available. Paul

...'s hardly CentOS's fault. I've still got to update my laptop, but am a little leery, because I think I've a got a hard drive failing. At any rate, thank you *again* for all your hard work. I don't know if I'm imagining it or not, but overall speed seems to be slightly "snappier" with the new update. -- RonB CentOS 5.5 - Optiplex GX270

On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 06:15:31PM +0100, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > As a test, I changed the opening of the locking.tdb and brlock.tdb > files to use the TDB_INTERNAL flag, avoiding use of the fcntl(F_SETLK) > syscall for locking individual database records. Performance was a lot > snappier, with quite a bit less system time used. > > What is the scope of implementing shared memory TDBs, where locking > could be done simply on structures? How would you implement cross-process locking without any syscalls? Maybe Linux has some fancy stuff here, but for most unixes we need to...

Sure, AJAX and RJS provide snappier performance by reducing the hits on the server. But, is it easily hacked in a RoR application? Can it be made as secure as a non-ajax web -app? -- Best Regards, -Larry "Work, work, work...there is no satisfactory alternative." --- E.Taft Benson -------------- next part ----...

...le reasons. I'm curious to see if this is only my problem, or if other have experienced it or can replicate it. And I was also wondering how I can remove Firefox 3.5 and its associated support files and get back to the regular repository. Firefox 3.5, for the most part, is very stable and is snappier than 3.0.11 -- only two sites have pages have crashed for me, but when it crashes it takes down my whole system and that's not good. And, if someone could mention this on the forum (there is a thread about Firefox 3.5) I would appreciate it. I can't log on to the forums. I am supposed to a...

I''ve got a page that has a <div> on it which is updated via RJS. If I add/delete from the <div>, advance to the next page, then use the Back button to return, the updates do not appear unless I Refresh the page. This is in development mode where caching is disabled (I checked development.rb to be sure). I''ve tried expiring the page and that doesn''t help.

First off, a big thank you to Zed and the development team for mongrel and mongrel cluster. I''ve deployed it for two apps (through an apache 2.2 proxy) and it''s amazing how much snappier everything is. Previously we were using lighttpd and lighttpd-fastcgi proxying through apache 2.0, which was turning into a hassle for lots of reasons, most notably the ruby fcgi bindings. I was shocked at how easy everything was to get everything up and running with mongrel, and foun...

Hi sorry for the slighty out of topic question but I''m sure someone here will be able to answer. Does anyone use some kind of remote connection to connect to MacOS ? I''m thinking of using VNC but I''d love to hear from other (especially secure) alternatives. I''m just fond of textmate, I have a dell laptop which I''d like to use as a terminal. kind

Hello. I am hoping someone can help with a problem I am having. I am running the Windows folding at home client through wine. This app is very load intensive and performs many scientific calculations. It consumes 100% of all six cores in my system. However, I run it with a "nice" level of 19 so that it only uses idle cycles. Unfortunately, with this setup, my system consistently

...aign Monitor (www.campaignmonitor.com) in our own products and services, but it seems to me that, for instance, when working with subscribers and such via a REST API (unlike processing ONE single payment via PayPal), it would be a good idea to cache the subscribers locally to make the service a bit snappier and also to reduce the dependence of a glitch free and lag free connection to Campaign Monitor whilst working with the subscriber lists (and such). My question is if anyone has made an attempt at caching such data, and if so how did you go about doing that, what did you learn (how/when to update t...

...p_mapping.tdb: 126 accesses > account_policy.tdb: 20 accesses > > As a test, I changed the opening of the locking.tdb and brlock.tdb > files to use the TDB_INTERNAL flag, avoiding use of the fcntl(F_SETLK) > syscall for locking individual database records. Performance was a lot > snappier, with quite a bit less system time used. > > What is the scope of implementing shared memory TDBs, where locking > could be done simply on structures? tdb's *are* shared memory, but shared memory needs locking for concurrent access. fcntl locks are the only safe, portable way of doin...

Jim diGriz''s QoS Script ? http://www.digriz.org.uk/jdg-qos-script/ FairNat ? http://www.metamorpher.de/fairnat/ other ?? bests andres _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

...) { rm -rf "${TEMP_DIR}"; } > createTempFile() { local MYTEMP=$(mktemp -qp "${TEMP_DIR}" || doLog "Failed to create temp file"; exit 1); echo $MYTEMP; } > I don?t think I need to clean up, and my ?temp_dir? will end up being permanent, as to make doveadm backup snappier I will simply maintain the directory there and use crown jobs to update the dir. > Also my backup scripts have locking procedures built-in so as to avoid race conditions. Also not sure if that?s needed when using doveadm backup, as it takes care of the potential race conditions. So the ide...

If I read the code correctly, only dotlocks are supported for locking of dovecot-uidlist. And I don't see any settings in the config file for it. As it turns out, dotlocks are very slow on my system, due to their implementation via hardlinks. Would it be possible to support other locking mechanisms for locking of the uidlist file? -jdb

Hi everyone, I have a client I've been trying to talk into switching from courier to dovecot, but the owner of the company wants me to set up two different accounts in Thunderbird (I finally got him switched to that from outlook express), one accessing his account through courier, and one through dovecot, so he can compare the speed... Is this even possible? I've never tried it

Hi Timo, I'm using Debian backports.org dovecot-imapd, 1:1.1.13-2~bpo50+1. I've got two different issues, a reoccurring, seemingly harmless one about "Corrupted index cache file" (boring.txt) and one that went bonkers over the least few days (bt.txt) causing much spamming of the logs. I've made bt.txt stop happening by just rm'ing dovecot.index* : find Maildir/

.... A better >> question is: which gives my users better performance? > > Good point. The users, however, as far as I know, all use tools like > offlineimap to synchronise in the background, so it hardly matters. > >> your users aren't paying attention. Dovecot will *seem* snappier >> if you do the indexing work on delivery rather than on access, >> even though it may spend more CPU cycles overall to do so. > > Does anyone have hard facts on how much the server process loses if > it encounters a folder with an index inconsistency? > > -- > marti...

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26057 Summary: Artefacts in kde 4 Product: xorg Version: 7.4 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: alex.vizor at gmail.com

On 29 May 2020, at 23:49, Admin Beckspaced <admin at beckspaced.com> wrote: > I also have maildir as mailbox format and use the following script to do daily backups > > https://github.com/tachtler/dovecot-backup A couple of notes on this quite useful script: My mktemp does not support -p (FreeBSD 12.1) is I had to change the script to: DIR_TEMP=$($MKTEMP_COMMAND -d $TMP_FOLDER

...the full regression suite, but GCC lasted longer and did more tests before exploding. If I could find a comprehensive Erlang testing suite, I'd blog those results as well. I have been using LLVMed Erlang for two months now, however, with no ill effects noted and a "feel" that it is snappier. Good work. LLVM rocks. -- Michael T. Richter <ttmrichter at gmail.com> (GoogleTalk: ttmrichter at gmail.com) We should sell bloat credits, the way the government sells pollution credits. Everybody's assigned a certain amount of bloat, and if they go over, they have to purchase bloat...