Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "snap_hour".
Did you mean:
snap_hourly
2010 Aug 03
1
snapshot space - miscalculation?
...usedbychildren 0 -
daten/backups usedbyrefreservation 0 -
daten/backups at zfs-auto-snap_hourly-2009-12-20-16_00 used 228M -
daten/backups at zfs-auto-snap_hourly-2009-12-20-17_00 used 150K -
daten/b...
2011 Feb 18
2
time-sliderd doesn''t remove snapshots
...not, I discovered recently that time-sliderd
was doing just a ton of "close" requests. I disabled time-sliderd while trying
to solve my performance problem.
I was also getting these error messages in the time-sliderd log file:
Warning: Cleanup failed to destroy: rpool/ROOT at zfs-auto-snap_hourly-2010-11-10-15h01
Details:
[''/usr/bin/pfexec'', ''/usr/sbin/zfs'', ''destroy'', ''-d'',
''rpool/ROOT at zfs-auto-snap_hourly-2010-11-10-15h01''] failed with exit code 1
cannot destroy ''rpool/ROOT at zfs-auto...
2018 Apr 04
0
Shadow_copy2 and exposing multiple levels of snapshots
...all.
The shadow:snapprefix, etc seems to be the way to do it, but I am unable to
get it to work.
When I setup the prefix, etc, I get know previous versions at all.
My setup in Smb.conf is below, and my directories are named as follows:
shadow:snapprefix =
^\(zfs-auto-snap_dai\)\{0,1\}\(zfs-auto-snap_hour\)\{0,1\}$
shadow:delimiter = ly-
shadow:format = ly-%Y-%m-%d-%H%M
Directories :
zfs-auto-snap_daily-2018-01-01-1235
zfs-auto-snap_daily-2018-03-15-1135
zfs-auto-snap_daily-2018-03-29-1135
zfs-auto-snap_hourly-2018-04-03-1817
zfs-auto-snap_hourly-2018-04-04-0817
zfs-auto-snap_weekly-2018-01-17-1...
2012 Sep 28
2
Failure to zfs destroy - after interrupting zfs receive
...of the same problem...
Unfortunately, now I have a filesystem where "zfs receive" was interrupted, and I can''t destroy the filesystem or the snapshot of the filesystem on the receiving side.
sudo zfs destroy -R tank/Downloads
cannot destroy ''tank/Downloads at zfs-auto-snap_hourly-2012-08-31-17h54'': dataset already exists
sudo zfs destroy -R tank/Downloads at zfs-auto-snap_hourly-2012-08-31-17h54
cannot destroy snapshot tank/Downloads at zfs-auto-snap_hourly-2012-08-31-17h54: snapshot is cloned
sudo zfs list -t all | grep Downloads
tank/Downloads
tank/Downloads...
2015 Jan 07
3
rsync splits filenames, creates special characters where none are, weird permissions
.../. \
/data/snapshots/hourly.0/folder/mail/
Where the local destination /data/snapshots is an NFS volume mounted with the flags
(rw,noatime,addr=192.168.1.XX)
and the source is a symlink to a zfs snapshot - that looks like this:
/var/backups/mail -> /tank/mail/.zfs/snapshot/zfs-auto-snap_hourly-2015-01-07-1417
as far as I can tell, both systems work with UTF8 just fine (source is Ubuntu 14.04 and target is Debian Lenny)
Now there seems to be a problem while gathering or transferring the file list,
as rsync tries to create files/folders that share a part with real files on the source,...
2015 Jan 07
1
rsync splits filenames, creates special characters where none are, weird permissions
...wrote:
>
>> Where the local destination /data/snapshots is an NFS volume mounted with the flags
>> (rw,noatime,addr=192.168.1.XX)
>> and the source is a symlink to a zfs snapshot - that looks like this:
>> /var/backups/mail -> /tank/mail/.zfs/snapshot/zfs-auto-snap_hourly-2015-01-07-1417
>
> Why not skip the NFS part and run rsync to the destination over the
> network? Rsync is written to minimize network traffic at the cost of
> local IO, and if you're doing NFS then that "local IO" is really also
> network traffic. You also elimina...
2015 Jan 07
0
rsync splits filenames, creates special characters where none are, weird permissions
...Jan 2015, Lenz Weber wrote:
> Where the local destination /data/snapshots is an NFS volume mounted with the flags
> (rw,noatime,addr=192.168.1.XX)
> and the source is a symlink to a zfs snapshot - that looks like this:
> /var/backups/mail -> /tank/mail/.zfs/snapshot/zfs-auto-snap_hourly-2015-01-07-1417
Why not skip the NFS part and run rsync to the destination over the
network? Rsync is written to minimize network traffic at the cost of
local IO, and if you're doing NFS then that "local IO" is really also
network traffic. You also eliminate one potential source o...