Displaying 20 results from an estimated 39 matches for "sme_act".
Did you mean:
smb_act
2020 Apr 28
0
[PATCH v3 38/75] x86/sev-es: Add SEV-ES Feature Detection
...h/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
extern u64 sme_me_mask;
+extern u64 sev_status;
extern bool sev_enabled;
void sme_encrypt_execute(unsigned long encrypted_kernel_vaddr,
@@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ void __init mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void);
bool sme_active(void);
bool sev_active(void);
+bool sev_es_active(void);
#define __bss_decrypted __attribute__((__section__(".bss..decrypted")))
@@ -71,6 +73,7 @@ static inline void __init sme_enable(struct boot_params *bp) { }
static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
static inl...
2020 Jul 24
0
[PATCH v5 38/75] x86/sev-es: Add SEV-ES Feature Detection
...pt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
extern u64 sme_me_mask;
+extern u64 sev_status;
extern bool sev_enabled;
void sme_encrypt_execute(unsigned long encrypted_kernel_vaddr,
@@ -50,6 +51,7 @@ void __init mem_encrypt_init(void);
bool sme_active(void);
bool sev_active(void);
+bool sev_es_active(void);
#define __bss_decrypted __attribute__((__section__(".bss..decrypted")))
@@ -72,6 +74,7 @@ static inline void __init sme_enable(struct boot_params *bp) { }
static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
static inl...
2020 Sep 07
0
[PATCH v7 36/72] x86/sev-es: Add SEV-ES Feature Detection
...pt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
extern u64 sme_me_mask;
+extern u64 sev_status;
extern bool sev_enabled;
void sme_encrypt_execute(unsigned long encrypted_kernel_vaddr,
@@ -50,6 +51,7 @@ void __init mem_encrypt_init(void);
bool sme_active(void);
bool sev_active(void);
+bool sev_es_active(void);
#define __bss_decrypted __attribute__((__section__(".bss..decrypted")))
@@ -72,6 +74,7 @@ static inline void __init sme_enable(struct boot_params *bp) { }
static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
static inl...
2020 Aug 24
0
[PATCH v6 39/76] x86/sev-es: Add SEV-ES Feature Detection
...pt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
extern u64 sme_me_mask;
+extern u64 sev_status;
extern bool sev_enabled;
void sme_encrypt_execute(unsigned long encrypted_kernel_vaddr,
@@ -50,6 +51,7 @@ void __init mem_encrypt_init(void);
bool sme_active(void);
bool sev_active(void);
+bool sev_es_active(void);
#define __bss_decrypted __attribute__((__section__(".bss..decrypted")))
@@ -72,6 +74,7 @@ static inline void __init sme_enable(struct boot_params *bp) { }
static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
static inl...
2020 Feb 11
0
[PATCH 35/62] x86/sev-es: Setup per-cpu GHCBs for the runtime handler
...asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ int __init early_set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long size);
void __init mem_encrypt_init(void);
void __init mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void);
+void __init encrypted_state_init_ghcbs(void);
bool sme_active(void);
bool sev_active(void);
bool sev_es_active(void);
@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ static inline void __init sme_early_init(void) { }
static inline void __init sme_encrypt_kernel(struct boot_params *bp) { }
static inline void __init sme_enable(struct boot_params *bp) { }
+static inline void encrypt...
2020 Feb 11
1
[PATCH 35/62] x86/sev-es: Setup per-cpu GHCBs for the runtime handler
.../x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ int __init early_set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long size);
> void __init mem_encrypt_init(void);
> void __init mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void);
>
> +void __init encrypted_state_init_ghcbs(void);
> bool sme_active(void);
> bool sev_active(void);
> bool sev_es_active(void);
> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ static inline void __init sme_early_init(void) { }
> static inline void __init sme_encrypt_kernel(struct boot_params *bp) { }
> static inline void __init sme_enable(struct boot_params *bp) { }
>...
2020 Sep 07
0
[PATCH v7 41/72] x86/sev-es: Setup per-cpu GHCBs for the runtime handler
...1c10 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ void __init mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void);
/* Architecture __weak replacement functions */
void __init mem_encrypt_init(void);
+void __init sev_es_init_vc_handling(void);
bool sme_active(void);
bool sev_active(void);
bool sev_es_active(void);
@@ -72,6 +73,7 @@ static inline void __init sme_early_init(void) { }
static inline void __init sme_encrypt_kernel(struct boot_params *bp) { }
static inline void __init sme_enable(struct boot_params *bp) { }
+static inline void sev_es_...
2020 Apr 28
0
[PATCH v3 43/75] x86/sev-es: Setup per-cpu GHCBs for the runtime handler
...de/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ int __init early_set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long size);
void __init mem_encrypt_init(void);
void __init mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void);
+void __init sev_es_init_vc_handling(void);
bool sme_active(void);
bool sev_active(void);
bool sev_es_active(void);
@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ static inline void __init sme_early_init(void) { }
static inline void __init sme_encrypt_kernel(struct boot_params *bp) { }
static inline void __init sme_enable(struct boot_params *bp) { }
+static inline void sev_es_...
2020 May 29
1
[PATCH v3 69/75] x86/realmode: Setup AP jump table
...t;asm/realmode.h>
> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> #include <asm/crash.h>
> +#include <asm/sev-es.h>
>
> struct real_mode_header *real_mode_header;
> u32 *trampoline_cr4_features;
> @@ -107,6 +108,11 @@ static void __init setup_real_mode(void)
> if (sme_active())
> trampoline_header->flags |= TH_FLAGS_SME_ACTIVE;
>
> + if (sev_es_active()) {
> + if (sev_es_setup_ap_jump_table(real_mode_header))
> + panic("Failed to update SEV-ES AP Jump Table");
> + }
> +
So this function gets slowly sprinkled with
if (sev-...
2019 May 09
0
[PATCH 04/10] s390/mm: force swiotlb for protected virtualization
...dev/null
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
> +#define S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +
> +#define sme_me_mask??? 0ULL
> +
> +static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
> +extern bool sev_active(void);
> +
I noticed this patch always returns false for sme_active. Is it safe to assume that
whatever fixups are required on x86 to deal with sme do not apply to s390?
> +int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
&...
2020 Aug 24
0
[PATCH v6 69/76] x86/realmode: Setup AP jump table
...#include <asm/sev-es.h>
struct real_mode_header *real_mode_header;
u32 *trampoline_cr4_features;
@@ -38,6 +39,19 @@ void __init reserve_real_mode(void)
crash_reserve_low_1M();
}
+static void sme_sev_setup_real_mode(struct trampoline_header *th)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
+ if (sme_active())
+ th->flags |= TH_FLAGS_SME_ACTIVE;
+
+ if (sev_es_active()) {
+ if (sev_es_setup_ap_jump_table(real_mode_header))
+ panic("Failed to update SEV-ES AP Jump Table");
+ }
+#endif
+}
+
static void __init setup_real_mode(void)
{
u16 real_mode_seg;
@@ -104,13 +118,13 @@ static...
2019 May 08
2
[PATCH 04/10] s390/mm: force swiotlb for protected virtualization
...> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
> +#define S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +
> +#define sme_me_mask 0ULL
This is rather ugly, but I understand why it's there
> +
> +static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
> +extern bool sev_active(void);
> +
> +int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
> +int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
> +
> +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> +
> +#endif /* S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__ */
> +
>...
2019 May 08
2
[PATCH 04/10] s390/mm: force swiotlb for protected virtualization
...> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
> +#define S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +
> +#define sme_me_mask 0ULL
This is rather ugly, but I understand why it's there
> +
> +static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
> +extern bool sev_active(void);
> +
> +int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
> +int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
> +
> +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> +
> +#endif /* S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__ */
> +
>...
2020 Jul 24
0
[PATCH v5 39/75] x86/sev-es: Print SEV-ES info into kernel log
...@@ -407,6 +407,31 @@ void __init mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void)
free_init_pages("unused decrypted", vaddr, vaddr_end);
}
+static void print_mem_encrypt_feature_info(void)
+{
+ pr_info("AMD Memory Encryption Features active:");
+
+ /* Secure Memory Encryption */
+ if (sme_active()) {
+ /*
+ * SME is mutually exclusive with any of the SEV
+ * features below.
+ */
+ pr_cont(" SME\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Secure Encrypted Virtualization */
+ if (sev_active())
+ pr_cont(" SEV");
+
+ /* Encrypted Register State */
+ if (sev_es_active())
+ pr_c...
2019 Apr 26
0
[PATCH 04/10] s390/mm: force swiotlb for protected virtualization
...ew file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0898c09a888c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
+#define S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
+
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+
+#define sme_me_mask 0ULL
+
+static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
+extern bool sev_active(void);
+
+int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
+int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
+
+#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
+
+#endif /* S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__ */
+
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/i...
2019 Jun 06
0
[PATCH v4 1/8] s390/mm: force swiotlb for protected virtualization
...ew file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0898c09a888c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
+#define S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
+
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+
+#define sme_me_mask 0ULL
+
+static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
+extern bool sev_active(void);
+
+int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
+int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
+
+#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
+
+#endif /* S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__ */
+
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/i...
2019 Jun 12
0
[PATCH v5 1/8] s390/mm: force swiotlb for protected virtualization
...ew file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0898c09a888c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
+#define S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
+
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+
+#define sme_me_mask 0ULL
+
+static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
+extern bool sev_active(void);
+
+int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
+int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
+
+#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
+
+#endif /* S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__ */
+
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/i...
2019 May 23
0
[PATCH v2 1/8] s390/mm: force swiotlb for protected virtualization
...ew file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0898c09a888c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
+#define S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
+
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+
+#define sme_me_mask 0ULL
+
+static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
+extern bool sev_active(void);
+
+int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
+int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
+
+#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
+
+#endif /* S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__ */
+
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/i...
2019 May 29
0
[PATCH v3 1/8] s390/mm: force swiotlb for protected virtualization
...ew file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0898c09a888c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
+#define S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
+
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+
+#define sme_me_mask 0ULL
+
+static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
+extern bool sev_active(void);
+
+int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
+int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
+
+#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
+
+#endif /* S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__ */
+
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/i...
2019 May 09
0
[PATCH 04/10] s390/mm: force swiotlb for protected virtualization
...0 */
> > +#ifndef S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
> > +#define S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
> > +
> > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > +
> > +#define sme_me_mask 0ULL
>
> This is rather ugly, but I understand why it's there
>
Nod.
> > +
> > +static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
> > +extern bool sev_active(void);
> > +
> > +int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
> > +int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
> > +
> > +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> > +
> > +#endi...