search for: smbv2

Hi, We're slowly deprecating SMBv1 support at work, so I'm trying to mount our Samba network shares using SMBv2.0. This should in principle be supported by the server, and seems works well enough for the Windows clients. But it fails for me with some errors which I do not understand. Can you help me figure out what's going on? Here's my system configuration and a quick summary of what I have so f...

Hi , I just need some clarification ; We currently use ntlm_auth + winbind for AD auth on Freeradius, will disabling SMBv1 break authentication for ntlm_auth + Freeradius ? Many Thanks Arnab

...> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 13 oktober 2017 14:14 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Share mounts in SMBv1 mode, but fails > weirdly in SMBv2 mode > > On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:00:34 +0200 > Hadrien Grasland via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Le 13/10/2017 à 01:46, Jeremy Allison via samba a écrit : > > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:58:58PM +0200, Hadrien Grasland via > > > samba wro...

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:58:58PM +0200, Hadrien Grasland via samba wrote: > Hi, > > We're slowly deprecating SMBv1 support at work, so I'm trying to > mount our Samba network shares using SMBv2.0. This should in > principle be supported by the server, and seems works well enough > for the Windows clients. But it fails for me with some errors which > I do not understand. > > Can you help me figure out what's going on? Here's my system > configuration and a quick...

Le 13/10/2017 à 01:46, Jeremy Allison via samba a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:58:58PM +0200, Hadrien Grasland via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We're slowly deprecating SMBv1 support at work, so I'm trying to >> mount our Samba network shares using SMBv2.0. This should in >> principle be supported by the server, and seems works well enough >> for the Windows clients. But it fails for me with some errors which >> I do not understand. >> >> Can you help me figure out what's going on? Here's my system >> con...

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Arnab Roy via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 8 juni 2017 14:23 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] ntlm_auth and SMBv2/v3 > > Hi , > > I just need some clarification ; > > We currently use ntlm_auth + winbind for AD auth on > Freeradius, will disabling SMBv1 break authentication for > ntlm_auth + Freeradius ? Yes > > Many Thanks > Arnab > -- > To unsubscribe from this...

...d : start_tls=no and tls_mode = yes   My preffered auth order if the app allows it. kerberos ldap(s) ntlm as last resort.   Best regards,   Louis       Van: Arnab Roy [mailto:arniekol at gmail.com] Verzonden: donderdag 8 juni 2017 15:07 Aan: L.P.H. van Belle Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] ntlm_auth and SMBv2/v3 Are their any plans finding a work around for this..as their tremendous amount of security paranoia related to smbv1 now... On 8 Jun 2017 13:54, "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba...

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Hadrien Grasland via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 13 oktober 2017 15:34 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Share mounts in SMBv1 mode, but fails > weirdly in SMBv2 mode > > Hi Louis, > > Thanks for your reply! > > > This might be a kernel thing. 4.13.5-1 .. ? Archlinux? > > OpenSUSE Tumbleweed, actually. > > At some point, I got tired of rebuilding the entire world all > the time > because of the millenary tension...

On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 15:30 +0200, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > hai, >   > Please keep it mailing to the list, this way is shows up of others also. > A workaround for disabling SMBv1, you can make your server less secure but thats not what i would do. > > Setting these to enable NTLM v1 again. > > lanman auth = yes NEVER set this. > ntlm auth = yes This

Christian Garling via samba wrote: > Take care that smbclient, cifs-utils and keyutils is installed. Also > have these lines in /etc/request-key.conf: > > create cifs.spnego * * /usr/sbin/cifs.upcall %k > create dns_resolver * * /usr/sbin/cifs.upcall %k > > My setup satisfies these requirements. I have tried the connection

Hi Aurélien, is there some documentation around where I can read about that? Where can I find the information, that I need Kernel 4.11 or above to get DFS with SMB2.0 / 2.1 / 3.0 and above working? Regards, Christian Am 12.06.2017 um 12:46 schrieb Aurélien Aptel: > Hi Christian, > > Christian Garling via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: >> a few days ago we

Hello Andrew, Do you plan to release the patch for "ntlm auth = mschapv2-only" option soon ? We need this on order to use freeradius in a "more safe" scenario than with "ntlm auth = yes" Best Regard, Lulzim KELMENI Direction des Systèmes d'Information Mairie de Saint-Ouen Le 08/06/2017 21:36, Andrew Bartlett via samba a écrit : > On Thu, 2017-06-08 at

...p. There is no "shell" or "exit to shell" feature. It calls library functions and does not call the "smbclient" command-line tool. Any changes to guisettings.xml requires entering the GUI and toggling the settings. I've tried setting Min Protocol to None, SMBv1, SMBv2. I've tried setting Max Protocol to None, SMBv1, SMBv2. No combination of settings works. Kodi crashes the same way (in libgenrand-samba4.so, opening /dev/urandom) each time. This looks like a Samba bug so I'll file it. Thanks, Michael

Hi Andrew, If I give register user as vignesh/guest, its working fine. While selecting the Guest radio button, guest user is not working. Guest user is working fine without AD connection. Kindly do the needful. Thanks, Vignesh. On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 4:28 PM Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 16:24 +0530, VigneshDhanraj G via samba wrote: > >

...t; Has anyone run into this, and if so, any workarounds on the Linux end? >> >> > the solution is to enable SMBv1 in Win10 ... look for this in the > Knowledge-Base of Microsoft > > https://support.microsoft.com/en-sg/help/2696547/how-to-detect-enable-and > -disable-smbv1-smbv2-and-smbv3-in-windows-and > Our desktop support person found that, but as I said, it is apparently a manual install for desktop support. And is it the case that, although we've shut off the lower level of security on samba on CentOS 6, that it's still smbv1? Are there any updates? Is the...

Hello list, a few days ago we migrated our shares to a DFS cluster, also we disabled SMBv1 protocol. Now we are no longer able to connect to the shares with our linux workstations. The setup looks like this: linux workstation -----> AD server (Windows Server 2008 R2) -----> file server (Windows Server 2016, running in 2008 R2 compat mode) I have searched the web for a solution on the

...n, guest user is not working. > > Guest user is working fine without AD connection. Andrew said: server signing as mandatory makes no sense with a guest connection, where there is no password with which to secure the session. Which is okay as far as it goes. Your client seems to be using SMBv2: [2019/09/25 15:01:46.695622, 5]../libcli/smb/smb2_signing.c:93(smb2_signing_sign_pdu)? signed SMB2 message And 'man smb.conf' has this to say about 'server signing': This controls whether the client is allowed or required to use SMB1 and SMB2 signing. Possible values are defa...

...Guest user is working fine without AD connection. > > Andrew said: > > server signing as mandatory makes no sense with a guest connection, > where there is no password with which to secure the session. > > Which is okay as far as it goes. > > Your client seems to be using SMBv2: > > [2019/09/25 15:01:46.695622, > 5]../libcli/smb/smb2_signing.c:93(smb2_signing_sign_pdu) signed SMB2 > message > > And 'man smb.conf' has this to say about 'server signing': > > This controls whether the client is allowed or required to use SMB1 and >...

Hi, folks, Just ran into a problem: someone with a new laptop, running Win 10, version 1709, tried to map their home directory (served from a CentOS 6.9 box, and it fails, with Windows complaining that it no longer supports SMBv1, and if you go to their site, you can install support for that manually.... The server running samba can *not* be updated to 7 - we have a lot of stuff based off

...gt; >> smbclient's "way" has relied on NT1/SMB1 stuff.? Just wondering if >> anyone know how to make this work the Windows way. >> > That's not what you asked ;-) Hmmm... I thought I was clear, but maybe not. > > There is extensive work being done on SMBv2/3, I am sure that something > like wsdd will get folded into the mix, but it won't be for some time. > Getting the core components working similar to the way SMBv1 works will > be the emphasis and some form of network browsing will probably come later. Again, wsdd (WS-DISCOVERY),...