search for: smbv1

On 05/04/2020 12:08, fredbezies via samba wrote: [access blocked on old smbv1 only hardware] >> >> I tweaked my /etc/samba/smb.conf to add this in [global] section. >> >> "server min protocol = CORE >> client min protocol = CORE" >> >Try doing a similar thing, but replace 'min' with 'max' and 'CORE' wit...

Hi, folks, Just ran into a problem: someone with a new laptop, running Win 10, version 1709, tried to map their home directory (served from a CentOS 6.9 box, and it fails, with Windows complaining that it no longer supports SMBv1, and if you go to their site, you can install support for that manually.... The server running samba can *not* be updated to 7 - we have a lot of stuff based off it, and most of our users use it, one way or another, so it's a major thing when we do finally upgrade (or, more likely, replace...

On 05.10.20 11:26, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > Stop me if I am wrong, but, from memory (long time since I saw a win95 > machine), win9x never used kerberos, it only used lanman auth, so > changes to kerberos shouldn't affect you. If it worked on 4.11.x, it > should work on 4.12.x You can install an optional Active Directory Service Client for win9x, but that only replaces

Hello. I'm using Archlinux Mate with its testing repositories activated. I am only the owner of an ISP "box" with an embedded HDD working only with SMBv1 protocol. After I updated my archlinux box to Samba 4.12.0, I noticed that my access was rejected. I tweaked my /etc/samba/smb.conf to add this in [global] section. "server min protocol = CORE client min protocol = CORE" After a reboot, I get back an access to the embedded HDD, but I...

...20 12:01, Nick Howitt via samba wrote: >> I am using Samba as a simple file server but I cannot browse its >> shares in Windows Explorer. I do not use SMB1. Am I missing a trick or >> is it not possible without SMB1? > No you are not missing a trick, Network Browsing requires SMBv1. Windows > now uses Network Discovery instead, you should be able to use this > instead: https://github.com/christgau/wsdd >> >> I am using ClearOS7 with the Centos7 4.10.4 samba package. > > Samba is starting to remove everything to do with SMBv1, 4.13.0 (just > rele...

hai,   Please keep it mailing to the list, this way is shows up of others also. A workaround for disabling SMBv1, you can make your server less secure but thats not what i would do. Setting these to enable NTLM v1 again. lanman auth = yes ntlm auth = yes raw NTLMv2 auth = yes I think also this is more a question for the free raduis list, but i would to for a ldap(s) setup. just dont mixup these to : star...

...wrote: > On 28.06.2018 16:30, mark wrote: > >> Just ran into a problem: someone with a new laptop, running Win 10, >> version 1709, tried to map their home directory (served from a CentOS 6.9 >> box, and it fails, with Windows complaining that it no longer supports >> SMBv1, and if you go to their site, you can install support >> for that manually.... >> >> The server running samba can *not* be updated to 7 - we have a lot of >> stuff based off it, and most of our users use it, one way or another, so >> it's a major thing when we do f...

...d then try vers=2.1 Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 13 oktober 2017 14:14 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Share mounts in SMBv1 mode, but fails > weirdly in SMBv2 mode > > On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:00:34 +0200 > Hadrien Grasland via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Le 13/10/2017 à 01:46, Jeremy Allison via samba a écrit : > > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:58:58PM +0200, Hadrie...

Hi Sonic, > Was looking into how to disable SMBv1 and NetBIOS on a Samba AD. > > I suspect that if one just wants to support Win7 and "greater" this > should work. However to prevent some open NetBIOS ports the "nbt" > service must be removed from the "server services" entry. you can add the two lines to...

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:58:58PM +0200, Hadrien Grasland via samba wrote: > Hi, > > We're slowly deprecating SMBv1 support at work, so I'm trying to > mount our Samba network shares using SMBv2.0. This should in > principle be supported by the server, and seems works well enough > for the Windows clients. But it fails for me with some errors which > I do not understand. > > Can you help m...

Was looking into how to disable SMBv1 and NetBIOS on a Samba AD. I suspect that if one just wants to support Win7 and "greater" this should work. However to prevent some open NetBIOS ports the "nbt" service must be removed from the "server services" entry. Basically these two entries (note nbt missing in...

...enforcing >> security should enforce these protocols or remove them from their OS >> isn't it? > > Microsoft ended support of NT4 servers over 15 years ago, but kept the > client code, but it is now actively trying to remove it, hence new > Windows 10 installs have SMBv1 turned off. You can never know just when > they will totally remove it, but I am sure it will be removed. If I have well understood the article that Louis send in a previous message, to enforce security it is very important use FQDN to refers to samba server and don't use netBIOS or LLMNR...

Hi, We're slowly deprecating SMBv1 support at work, so I'm trying to mount our Samba network shares using SMBv2.0. This should in principle be supported by the server, and seems works well enough for the Windows clients. But it fails for me with some errors which I do not understand. Can you help me figure out what's goi...

...3/smbd/smb2_server.c:3274(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex) > smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[1] status[NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER] || at ../../source3/smbd/smb2_ioctl.c:312 The problem is that you are mixing up netbios and short hostnames. 'netbios' relies on SMBv1 and hostnames rely on DNS, AD requires DNS, so if you want your computer to have more than one name, you must use a CNAME. The next problem has come over the horizon, SMBv1 is going away, recent versions of Windows and Samba have it turned off by default and you need it for browsing. You had be...

On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 09:44:35 +0200 Arnaud Bougeard via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Why do you tell me I am using SMBv1? I can't see any parameter to set > it ? I never said you were using SMBv1, I said running an NT4-style domain requires SMBv1. > > For idmapping, I'm afraid of side effects in the long term, my server > being in AD, should I ignore the ldap in my smb.conf? > Which lines w...

Hi , I just need some clarification ; We currently use ntlm_auth + winbind for AD auth on Freeradius, will disabling SMBv1 break authentication for ntlm_auth + Freeradius ? Many Thanks Arnab

...owitt via samba wrote: >>> I am using Samba as a simple file server but I cannot browse its >>> shares in Windows Explorer. I do not use SMB1. Am I missing a trick >>> or is it not possible without SMB1? >> No you are not missing a trick, Network Browsing requires SMBv1. >> Windows now uses Network Discovery instead, you should be able to use >> this instead: https://github.com/christgau/wsdd >>> >>> I am using ClearOS7 with the Centos7 4.10.4 samba package. >> >> Samba is starting to remove everything to do with SMBv1,...

...; > In short, are we doomed to stay with the unsafe Windows share > connections, or is there another way to migrate from Windows to > Linux? Maybe running an ancient Samba too, but that does not sound > too attractive? You probably need three machines: Your industrial robots that use SMBv1 A 'machine' in the middle with 'server min protocol = NT1' set (it will default to 'client min protocol = SMB2_02' A Samba server that isn't using SMBv1 The robot can connect to and download files from the intermediate machine, which in turn (without using SMBv1) can...

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Hadrien Grasland via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 13 oktober 2017 15:34 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Share mounts in SMBv1 mode, but fails > weirdly in SMBv2 mode > > Hi Louis, > > Thanks for your reply! > > > This might be a kernel thing. 4.13.5-1 .. ? Archlinux? > > OpenSUSE Tumbleweed, actually. > > At some point, I got tired of rebuilding the entire world all > the time...

Hello, We have Samba 4.0.21 running on a Linux machine with a share configured. It doesn't show in Windows 10 "Network" listing of available shares, unless I turn on SMBv1 in the Window features (and reboot). Accessing the share by IP or hostname works, even with SMBv1 disabled on Windows 10. Windows 10 is of the build 1804. Is enabling SMBv1 on the Windows 10 side the only solution to get Linux share be visible for the Windows "Network" listing? Any help...