search for: smbtcon

...12/1998 11:03:07 Transaction 2 of length 90 switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 1880) sesssetupX:name=[GJUNCU] Registered username guest for guest access guest is in 1 groups 100 uid 405 registered to name guest Clearing default real name 01/12/1998 11:03:07 Transaction 3 of length 70 switch message SMBtcon (pid 1880) Allowed connection from ws002.dntcj.ro (192.168.41.2) to compas Trying username compaS ACCEPTED: session list username and given password ok found free connection number 6 Forced group compas Connect path is /file.server/compas gjuncu is in 5 groups 102 17 103 104 101 Can't become c...

...egotiate()/ reply_spnego_kerberos() calls that invokes register_vuid() to register uvid with different vuid# for a logon user or a client. Finally, kill the intermediate vuid by invalidate_vuid(vuid). This caused too many SMB calls on the wire(more than hundreds of SMB calls, including SMBsesssetup,SMBtcon,SMBtdis,SMBclose,SMBulogoff), but do nothing. [2007/08/14 12:01:03, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:ads_secrets_verify_ticket(251) ads_secrets_verify_ticket: enc type [18] failed to decrypt with error Bad encryption type [2007/08/14 12:01:03, 10] libads/kerberos_verify.c:ads_secrets_verify_ticket(2...

...in95 client config? Hmmmm..... Turned on debugging and it looks like the Win95 client is not passing the password to samba: parsing net-path \\ZEPPO\SIMON, passlen=0 Got device type ????? 07/31/97 02:01:27 invalid username/password for simon 07/31/97 02:01:27 error packet at line 131 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 this is using the NT LM 0.12 protocol (the default?). I noted that the DOS client used DOS LM1.2X002, I added a 'protocol = LANMAN2' statement to smb.conf. Tried to connect, the Win95 client uses an appropriate protocol but still fails with similar messages. So, I'...

...ool has about 1,000 students and about 100 workstations for students. Would this be enough to go over the 128 (256) connections? > > Sep 3 16:52:26 PDC_OSG smbd[10281]: admin_01 (213.34.194.5) couldn't find > > service lock$ > > Assuming [lock$] is defined in smb.conf, the SMBtcon failed because of the > previous error. > > The strange part is that admin_01 as the name implies is not really a students machine. It has nothing to do with that samba server? But perhaps this is because I preserved the nt netbios names for these linux machines. Perhaps that is causing p...