search for: smbmv

I suspect I've found a bug buried somewhere deep inside the SMBmv code; I have an application, Archicad, which will not allow you to file->save over the top of an existing file, unless you happen to be the (unix) owner of that file. Unix permissions are mode 664, users can otherwise manipulate the files as expected. I've attempted various combinations/ p...

Apparently there's a new "Inherit Owner" option for smb.conf that allows you to configure Samba to set the owner of a new file or directory based on owner of the parent directory. That seems like a very useful feature! My question is, does "Inherit Owner" also work when you MOVE a file from one directory to another? In other words, if a file called

...100 (0x64) MID = 65172 (0xfe94) Word Count = 0 (0x0) smb_bcc=0 (ttl 60, id 2798, len 79) 16:25:29.929096 spt01.1042 > 146.39.192.33.netbios-ssn: P [tcp sum ok] 9045:9114(69) ack 28092 win 28672 >>> NBT Packet NBT Session Packet Flags=0x0 Length=65 (0x41) SMB PACKET: SMBmv (REQUEST) SMB Command = 0x7 Error class = 0x0 Error code = 0 (0x0) Flags1 = 0x8 Flags2 = 0x3 Tree ID = 4 (0x4) Proc ID = 175 (0xaf) UID = 100 (0x64) MID = 65282 (0xff02) Word Count = 1 (0x1) smbvwv[]= Attrib=HIDDEN SYSTEM DIR smbbuf[...

Hi folks, I've got a serious problem with samba since I upgrade an stone-age caldera-box with a 2.0.x-samba to redhat-7.2 with 2.2.1a-samba. I can create, delete directories and files without any problems. But renaming them (i.e. by creating a new folder which has new folder as default) does not work. I always get an error, that the file does not exist. I am trying from a win2k-professional

...ose (pid 13672) conn 0x7f17e59acfa0 [2009/09/10 01:50:32, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_close(4338) close directory fnum=10829 [2009/09/10 01:50:32, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1554) Transaction 270 of length 220 (0 toread) [2009/09/10 01:50:32, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(1378) switch message SMBmv (pid 13672) conn 0x7f17e59acfa0 [2009/09/10 01:50:32, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_mv(6104) reply_mv : piazza_doc/09-07-03.Business_Plan/Neuer Ordner -> piazza_doc/09-07-03.Business_Plan/test [2009/09/10 01:50:32, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(5832) rename_internals: case_sensitive = 0, case_pre...

...gtepub98.xlw, is_8_3 = 1 [2000/03/22 15:00:30, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3641) rename_internals: failed doing rename on monicas exceldoc/gateway/EC357000 -> monicas excel doc/gateway/gtepub98.xlw [2000/03/22 15:00:30, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) error packet at line 3701 cmd=7 (SMBmv) eclass=1 ecode=183 Does this ring a bell with anyone? Is it relevant that this shared volume is not local to the samba server but rather mounted over a 100BaseT NFS backbone? (using knfsd and nfslock as implemented in kernel 2.2.13ac2 and redhat-6.1 userspace)?? I know I had a devil of a time...

Hi, Using Samba 3.0.1 on SuSE Linux (follow symlinks on) we noticed the following behaviour: A symbolic link to a file gets overwritten (replaced) by the target-file contents if the symbolic link is saved from a windows client. This is not what we expected, because a link represents the file, and so all actions executed on the link should actually be executed on the target-file, not the link. I

...d/reply.c:rename_internals(3693) rename_internals: case_sensitive = 0, case_preserve = 1, short case preserve = 0, directory = ./Neu Textdatei.txt, newname = ./abcdef.txt, last_component_dest = abcdef.txt, is_8_3 = 0 [2004/06/17 11:37:40, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch message SMBmv (pid 732) [2004/06/17 11:37:40, 4] smbd/uid.c:change_to_user(186) change_to_user: Skipping user change - already user [2004/06/17 11:37:40, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_mv(3943) reply_mv : Neu Textdatei.txt -> ABCDEF.TXT [2004/06/17 11:37:40, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(114) unix_convert call...

..._DENIED rename data/FOLDERR -> data/FOLDER [2011/01/19 19:56:32, 3] smbd/reply.c:6009(rename_internals) rename_internals: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED rename data/FOLDERR -> data/FOLDER [2011/01/19 19:56:32, 3] smbd/error.c:60(error_packet_set) error packet at smbd/reply.c(6241) cmd=7 (SMBmv) NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED ------ WHEN RENAME WORKS (Mac 1): ------ [2011/01/19 19:57:38, 3] smbd/reply.c:5949(rename_internals) rename_internals: case_sensitive = 0, case_preserve = 1, short case preserve = 1, directory = data/FOLDERR, newname = data/FOLDER, last_component_dest = FOLDER [2011/...

I'm hoping someone has some insight into a problem I'm currenty having, which is: No one is able to edit (in place) documents with Word 2000 on a samba (2.2.6) disk share. A user can open word and save a document to the share, but when they go to edit the document Word says "Word cannot complete the save due to a file permission error". From Microsoft KB Q211632 it appears