Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "smb_assert".
2004 Nov 12
1
Panic in log when Win98/ME tries to print on samba 3.0.8
...ting_db.c Fri Nov 12 17:02:00 2004
@@ -32,13 +32,26 @@
struct tdb_print_db *get_print_db_byname(const char *printername)
{
+
struct tdb_print_db *p = NULL, *last_entry = NULL;
int num_open = 0;
pstring printdb_path;
BOOL done_become_root = False;
-
- SMB_ASSERT(printername != NULL);
-
+
+ /*
+ * When a Win98 or ME client tries to print
+ * the assertion killed the printjob because
+ * get_print_db_byname was called with NULL as an
+ * argument after the valid printers had been
+ * searched. Then the client get...
2005 Apr 18
0
Announcement Samba 3.0.14a
...n in K?rze.
Dieses Samba-Release behebt einige Fehler, darunter:
* Kompatibilit?tsprobleme zwischen Winbind und Windows 2003 SP1
Dom?nencontrollern (*2k3sp1*).
* MS-DFS Fehler mit Windows XP SP2 Clients.
* Hohe CPU-Auslastungen durch Endlosschleifen in dem FindNext() Server Code.
* Ung?ltigen SMB_ASSERT(), der smbd panic bei Dateien mit ACLs verursacht hat.
Au?erdem gibt es eine die smb.conf Parameter betreffende ?nderung:
* dos filetimes ist jetzt standardm??ig aktiviert
Samba SerNet Team
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-- www.sambaxp.org -- www.enterpris...
2020 May 14
0
open 2nd pdf on dfs share with Acrobat Reader not possible
...'/', '\\');
+
+ if (smb_fname->stream_name != NULL) {
+ const char *s = smb_fname->stream_name;
+ const char *e = NULL;
+ size_t n;
+
+ SMB_ASSERT(s[0] != '\0');
+
+ /*
+ * smb_fname->stream_name is in form
+ * of ':StrEam:$DATA', but we should only
+ * append ':StrEam' here.
+...
2000 Aug 29
1
PANIC: assert failed rpc_parse/parse_net.c
Has anyone come across the above in 2.0.7 in a Solaris/Sunos
environment.
The result is that certain users cann't map drives.
Thought it might be something specifc to this version and the user being
a secondary member of a large group (not netgroups)...
Then I checked the source and the parse_net.c is the same version....
Anyone....
TIA
Gordon
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
...Hello,
I hit the assert error in parse_samr.c line 1651, which I think is not
correct in its current form:
--- parse_samr.c-orig Mon Jul 2 21:34:49 2001
+++ parse_samr.c Mon Jul 2 21:25:03 2001
@@ -1648,7 +1648,7 @@
if(!prs_align(ps))
return False;
- SMB_ASSERT_ARRAY(sam->sam, num_entries);
+ //SMB_ASSERT_ARRAY(sam->sam, num_entries);
for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) {
if(!sam_io_sam_entry3("", &sam->sam[i], ps, depth))
Interesting enough, when I remove the ASSERT (and with my patch sent
earlie...