search for: smb3_00

...henever a backup would start. I stumbled upon disabling encryption on the server (i.e. changing "smb encrypt" from "required" to "off") to prevent this issue. After further digging, I'm able to reproduce this issue using smbclient on the server machine with either SMB3_00 or SMB3_02 as the max protocol with the server configured to require encryption. Uploading a file increases the RSS of the smbd process by roughly the size of the uploaded file. My minimal smb.conf and relevant smbstatus output are below. Have I missed something in the configuration? Or is this an...

...with the same machine / PID. eg: a trimmed view.. Samba version 4.2.3 PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 35585 nobody nobody 192.168.0.41 (ipv4:192.168.0.41:51340) SMB3_00 35585 user1 user1 192.168.0.41 (ipv4:192.168.0.41:51340) SMB3_00 35585 nobody nobody 192.168.0.41 (ipv4:192.168.0.41:51340) SMB3_00 35585 nobody nobody 192.168.0.41 (ipv4:192.168.0.41:51340) SMB3_00 I've tried limiting the protocol tho SM...

...; You could always code up what you require and propose it as a patch for > Samba. I think this isn't (exactly) a Samba problem. The problem is we can't enmerated shares exposed from MacOS. But our Windows and MacOS clients can. We get: smb1cli_req_writev_submit: called for dialect[SMB3_00] server[mac_svr2] Error returning browse list: NT_STATUS_REVISION_MISMATCH I think this is some sort of Mac problem(?) Thanks for everyone's time. Unless you have some hints with regards to the above.

...isabling > SMB2/3 on the Windows 10 client is your best, if not ideal, option. > > Instructions for doing.this can be found > here: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2696547 I have the same problem. (Samba 4.1.11 and Windows 10 not able to join domain because our best protocol is SMB3_00) But to be sure I understand correctly : * It is possible to modify Windows 10 to use older protocols ? * If yes, we should disable SMB3 on Windows 10 ? * But if I read the Microsoft document above I don't understand what exactly I should do to disable SMB3 ? Thanks a lot in advanc...

...as letter L: in windows and the file was updated many time Windows don't close the connection when the operator disconnect windows. This is an extract of smbstatus root at robytnuovo~# smbstatus |grep 246 1877????? emissionefatture? emissionefatture? 192.168.0.246 (ipv4:192.168.0.246:49701) SMB3_00 lavori-ilaria?? 1877?? 192.168.0.246? Wed Feb 19 14:37:30 2020 appoggio???? 1877?? 192.168.0.246? Wed Feb 19 14:37:30 2020 praticx????? 1877?? 192.168.0.246? Wed Feb 19 14:37:30 2020 But the operator use this share root at roberto/lavori/ILARIA# v totale 4808 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4900596? 3 feb...

Hi, windows 7 supports smb3. If centos's samba server suport smb3, how to make windows 10 support smb3 too? Thanks! Regards Andrew At 2019-09-13 15:47:34, "John Hodrien" <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: >On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, me at tdiehl.org wrote: > >> Why? This is NOT necessary for win 10 to work. I do not even know if it will >> work with

01.04.2024 13:56, Jones Syue ???: >> I can't say for sure but I *think* each time the client is windows server 2012. > > Looks good :) If run this script[1] to test multiple dialects, found only > SMB3_00 and SMB3_02 has this "(sign_algo_id=1)", and per doc[2] it could > be happend with ws2012 and ws2012r2. This *is* 2012 r2. The protocol version it negotiates is shown by smbstatus on samba server, it is SMB3_02. More modern workstations negotiate SMB3_11. > Perhaps some kind of...

...as a patch for >>> Samba. >> >> I think this isn't (exactly) a Samba problem. The problem is we can't >> enmerated shares exposed from MacOS. But our Windows and MacOS clients can. >> >> We get: >> smb1cli_req_writev_submit: called for dialect[SMB3_00] server[mac_svr2] >> Error returning browse list: NT_STATUS_REVISION_MISMATCH >> >> I think this is some sort of Mac problem(?) Thanks for everyone's time. >> Unless you have some hints with regards to the above. > > Can you log a bug on bugzilla.samba.org, attac...

...as a patch for >>> Samba. >> >> I think this isn't (exactly) a Samba problem. The problem is we can't >> enmerated shares exposed from MacOS. But our Windows and MacOS clients can. >> >> We get: >> smb1cli_req_writev_submit: called for dialect[SMB3_00] server[mac_svr2] >> Error returning browse list: NT_STATUS_REVISION_MISMATCH > > This error is generated by the smbcient libraries trying > to send an SMB1 writev request to a server that only supports > SMB2 or above. From our code: > > libcli/smb/smbXcli_base.c:smb1cli_...

...to a share on some Netapp box fails with “client max protocol” set to SMB3_11 (or unset): protocol negotiation failed: NT_STATUS_INVALID_NETWORK_RESPONSE With a protocol max set to SMB3_10 or SMB3_02 the login prompt is reached and subsequent file access is succeeds: negotiated dialect[SMB3_00] against server[192.168.42.42] got OID=1.2.840.48018.1.2.2 Enter DOM.AIN\foobar's password: The symptoms resemble that of this bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13009 but the protocol versions differ. Also we’re pretty much on vanilla 4.7.11 so we have commit 81f31fd509....

...#39;m using the latest git 4.2.0 samba version (4.2.0rc4-GIT-93b73bf, to get latest vfs_fruit module). I noticed the following strange behavior with OSX clients (10.10.1, 10.10.2 beta): When they connect using either smb 3.0 or 2.1 (verified on the server with `smbstatus` and the `version` column `SMB3_00` or `SMB2_10` respectively), symbolic links pointing at non existent files are not displayed in the client. So for example I have this folder structure folder/ folder/existent_file folder/symlink_existent --> existent_file # shows on the osx client folder/symlink_nonexistent --> nonexistent_...

...name domain users 192.168.xxx.2(ipv4:192.168.xxx.2:63181) SMB3_11 partial(AES-128-CCM) partial(AES-128-CMAC) 27439 username domain users 192.168.x.5 (ipv4:192.168.x.5:1102) NT1 - - 27336 root root 192.168.xxx.3(ipv4:192.168.xxx.3:34540) SMB3_00 - - 27337 root root 192.168.xxx.4(ipv4:192.168.xxx.4:41138) SMB3_00 - - >From above list, top to bottem. The first is a windows 7 pc. and the second a win10 PC. connecting to a share configured with : smb encryp...

...ows 7 (for comparison). Briefly, unlike the successful attempt, the failed one starts with: switch message SMBnegprot (pid 2855) conn 0x0 then it requests a number of different protocols before selecting SMB2_FF. Then, after some security negotiations, it switches to protocol SMB 2.???, then SMB3_00, followed by: Server exit (NT_STATUS_END_OF_FILE). The successful attempt selects protocol SMB2_10 from the start, but this protocol is not even requested by Windows 10. Here are the logs : Failed attempt (from Windows 10) http://pastebin.com/M0xmBuY3 Successful attempt (from Windows 7) ht...

...Group Machine Protocol Version ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7051 ash Domain Admins 10.4.1.240 (ipv4:10.4.1.240:39646) NT1 7057 john. Domain Admins 10.4.1.242 (ipv4:10.4.1.242:65033) SMB3_00 7057 john.doe Domain Admins 10.4.1.242 (ipv4:10.4.1.242:65033) SMB3_00 7689 tim.doe Domain Admins 10.4.1.245 (ipv4:10.4.1.245:57526) SMB3_00 7060 ryan Domain Admins 10.4.1.247 (ipv4:10.4.1.247:54588) SMB2_10 Service pid machine...

...>> > ideal, option. >> > >> > Instructions for doing.this can be found >> > here: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2696547 >> >> I have the same problem. (Samba 4.1.11 and Windows 10 not able to >> join domain because our best protocol is SMB3_00) >> >> But to be sure I understand correctly : >> >> * It is possible to modify Windows 10 to use older protocols ? >> * If yes, we should disable SMB3 on Windows 10 ? >> * But if I read the Microsoft document above I don't understand what >>...

...as a patch for >>> Samba. >> >> I think this isn't (exactly) a Samba problem. The problem is we can't >> enmerated shares exposed from MacOS. But our Windows and MacOS clients can. >> >> We get: >> smb1cli_req_writev_submit: called for dialect[SMB3_00] server[mac_svr2] >> Error returning browse list: NT_STATUS_REVISION_MISMATCH >> >> I think this is some sort of Mac problem(?) Thanks for everyone's time. >> Unless you have some hints with regards to the above. > > Can you log a bug on bugzilla.samba.org, attac...

...:1322(init_oplocks) init_oplocks: initializing messages. [2016/10/10 17:14:50.133858, 3] ../source3/smbd/process.c:1957(process_smb) Transaction 0 of length 110 (0 toread) [2016/10/10 17:14:50.134030, 3] ../source3/smbd/smb2_negprot.c:290(smbd_smb2_request_process_negprot) Selected protocol SMB3_00 [libdefaults] default_realm = HEBE.US dns_lookup_realm = true dns_lookup_kdc = true ticket_lifetime = 24h renew_lifetime = 7d forwardable = true default_keytab_name = FILE:/etc/krb5.keytab [realms] HEBE.US = { k...

...supported by Windows technical preview builds. They used to be useful in order to test against the latest Windows versions, but it's no longer useful to have them. If you have them explicitly specified in your smb.conf or an the command line, you need to replace them like this: - SMB2_22 => SMB3_00 - SMB2_24 => SMB3_00 - SMB3_10 => SMB3_11 Note that it's typically not useful to specify "client max protocol" or "server max protocol" explicitly to a specific dialect, just leave them unspecified or specify the value "default". New GPG key ----------- The...

...supported by Windows technical preview builds. They used to be useful in order to test against the latest Windows versions, but it's no longer useful to have them. If you have them explicitly specified in your smb.conf or an the command line, you need to replace them like this: - SMB2_22 => SMB3_00 - SMB2_24 => SMB3_00 - SMB3_10 => SMB3_11 Note that it's typically not useful to specify "client max protocol" or "server max protocol" explicitly to a specific dialect, just leave them unspecified or specify the value "default". New GPG key ----------- The...

...supported by Windows technical preview builds. They used to be useful in order to test against the latest Windows versions, but it's no longer useful to have them. If you have them explicitly specified in your smb.conf or an the command line, you need to replace them like this: - SMB2_22 => SMB3_00 - SMB2_24 => SMB3_00 - SMB3_10 => SMB3_11 Note that it's typically not useful to specify "client max protocol" or "server max protocol" explicitly to a specific dialect, just leave them unspecified or specify the value "default". New GPG key ----------- The...