search for: smb2.1

Hi Everyone, My doubts are for Samba4.1 performance related enhancements (SMB2.1 / SMB3.0). My experimental samba server hardware is running 4.1 version. Want to improve robocopy WRITE throughput from a two samba client machines (win7 or win8 or server2012 x86 servers). Someone please advice me how can I use SMB2.1 or SMB3.0 capabilities to improve WRITE throughput. I tried samba4.1

hi Michael, Sorry for taking so long to reply, I just get back on vacation. Your advice is very helpful. Our purpose is no IO interrupted with Window 7 cifs client accessing the shared folder when virtual IP taken over by another node. SMB3.0 or newer protocol do meet that demand, but Window 7 cifs client only supports SMB2.1 protocol and previous versions. So we need implement a

hi Michael： We want to implement the ‘persistent handle’ function under Windows 7(SMB 2.1), which has only local ‘durable handle’. For now my plan is just to synchronize the following files between cluster nodes: smbXsrv_open_global.tdb.0 smbXsrv_session_global.tdb.0 smbXsrv_tcon_global.tdb.0 locking.tdb.0 It probably won’t be completed, so I’m writing to ask for your advice. Any help would be

On 2016-09-28 at 12:50 +0000, Weidong wrote: > hi Michael： Hi Weidong, Thank you for your message! > We want to implement the ‘persistent handle’ function under > Windows 7(SMB 2.1), which has only local ‘durable handle’. Hmm. As you say: Windows 7 / SMB 2.1 does _not_ support presistent handles. This requires SMB 3.0 or newer. Windows 7 supports durable handles, which is already

Trying to get a linux samba file server using samba 4.0.3 (compiled on the machine) running on ubuntu 3.8rc6 kernel to share out and negotiate with a linux client running the same kernel and smbd compiled from 4.0.3 samba source. Using wireshark to view the negotiations, I only see NT LM 0.12 (SMB v. 1). Tried forcing the file server via "min protocol = SMB2" in the

Hi all, Behavior described in this email is identical whether I try to mount at 192.168.100.2, my desktop and location of my Samba server, or 192.168.100.239, my laptop that is remote from my desktop with Samba server... I want to mount a share defined on my Linux desktop, on my Linux laptop, as a better alternative than sshfs or NFS. I want this mount to happen as version 2.x or 3.x, not as

On 13/05/2019 17:05, Steve Litt via samba wrote: > Hi all, > > Behavior described in this email is identical whether I try to mount at > 192.168.100.2, my desktop and location of my Samba server, or > 192.168.100.239, my laptop that is remote from my desktop with Samba > server... > > I want to mount a share defined on my Linux desktop, on my Linux > laptop, as a better

Sorry for a rather 'unifornative' subject, but i've little o no clue on this. I'm using at work 'pam_mount' with a rather standard configuration to mount via CIFS/SMB user's home directory, from a samba AD member server. This configuration is a bit 'old' (mint sonya, AKA Ubuntu 16.04 as a client, so samba 4.3; debian and samba 4.8 as a server), but work

Hello I try to implement pam_mount and I have errors. When I login to ubuntu desktop client I have an error with "mounting read-only" but if later to logon on domain I go to the files application and map the resource shares manually, work fine. Attach the syslog trace: Sep 24 10:22:13 ubuntucliente lightdm[708]: (pam_mount.c:365): pam_mount 2.14: entering auth stage Sep 24 10:22:20

> > Unless you upload a network capture of you mounting and doing the ls -lR > on the client it's hard to say what really goes on. I understand you > might not want to make it public.. but if you do > This is the last thing I'll try after I've exhausted all the other options. How are you mounting your share (which mount options)? > Something weird is going on with

Hi, I am trying to figure out what features in terms of protocols (SMB/CIFS, SMB2, SMB2.1, SMB3) a client uses when being connected to a Samba server (v4.1.17). Is there any tool like smbstatus that shows which protocol version (and possibly which features) a client is using in a connection? (Feature in the sense of 'using encryption' for example). Thanks, Adi

Hi, I am running samba-4.1.4 on my Fedora OS. I have provided the "client max protocol = SMB3" and "server max protocol = SMB3" parameters in smb.conf file I'm able to get only SMB2.1 packets using wireshark after fileshare access from my windows 7 machine. And not SMB3 packets. SMB2->NegotiateProtocol Response 0x0202 0x0210 Samba-4.1.4 is supporting SMB3 also. So

Samba Team Releases Samba 4.0 ============================= December 11th 2012. The Samba Team is proud to announce the release of Samba 4.0, a major new release of the award-winning Free Software file, print and authentication server suite for Microsoft Windows clients. The First Free Software Active Directory Compatible Server

Samba Team Releases Samba 4.0 ============================= December 11th 2012. The Samba Team is proud to announce the release of Samba 4.0, a major new release of the award-winning Free Software file, print and authentication server suite for Microsoft Windows clients. The First Free Software Active Directory Compatible Server

Hai Marco, Is the UPN set for this server. CIFS/hostnam.fqdn ? Does its A and PTR match with the "real" hostname? But i see : smb2_get_dfs_refer rc Not commenting on this expect... upgrade the servers.. ;-) Try : apt install keyutils this might be missing and is needed for CIFS kerberos mounts mount -t cifs -o user=USER,domain=DOMAIN,cruid=USER,sec=krb5,vers=3.0

## QUESTION I am sharing a 120GB folder with lots of files via Samba on a LAN (1Gbps connection). 1) Doing an `ls -lR` on the server (on this folder) takes ~32 seconds, compared with **72 minutes** on the client. Is this difference in performance expected (due to network and protocol overhead)? 2) While the client is executing an `ls -lR`, one smbd process on the server uses about 30-40% of a

Hi @all, I have some problems when using pam_mount.conf.xml to mount shares via kerberos (and also for ntlm) regarding reliability of the mount. I have tested the issue with 2 different environments. My environments are: 2 Microsoft Domain Controllers + a separate fileserver and Ubuntu 18.04 or 22.04 as clients. My other tested environment is one Microsoft Server 2019 (as domain controller and

Given this recent announcement https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/current-activity/2017/01/16/SMB-Security-Best-Practices How does one turn off and verify the SMB protocol setting? I'm a bit confused by looking at the man page for smb.conf. I have the following set which I believe to be the default settings. samba-tool testparm -v | grep "max protocol" client ipc max

Hi guys, We are currently running a clustered samba setup with 3 nodes very successfully. The only thing that bothers me is that whenever we change permissions on a shared directory, we have to restart ctdb on the nodes where affected users are still connected to push the changed permissions to the hosts by basically killing their connections and thus forcing them to reconnect. However,

Hello, I have a little problem which I can't solve with Samba used under Debian Squeeze. (version of Samba : 3.5.6) I made a transfer speed between Samba server and a samba mount on the same PC copy to RAM and the same file directly to RAM. 1. HDD to RAM => 105-115Mo/s 2. Shared the same HDD directory with samba and mount to "/media" locally with (mount -t smbfs) : Samba to RAM