search for: smartmutex

...Node::getTemporary(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Metadata*>) () from /opt/buildbot/lib/libLLVM-3.6svn.so > #7 0x00007ffff3426b3f in MapValueImpl(llvm::Metadata const*, llvm::ValueMap<llvm::Value const*, llvm::WeakVH, llvm::ValueMapConfig<llvm::Value const*, llvm::sys::SmartMutex<false> > >&, llvm::RemapFlags, llvm::ValueMapTypeRemapper*, llvm::ValueMaterializer*) () > from /opt/buildbot/lib/libLLVM-3.6svn.so > #8 0x00007ffff3426bd6 in MapValueImpl(llvm::Metadata const*, llvm::ValueMap<llvm::Value const*, llvm::WeakVH, llvm::ValueMapConfig<llv...

The `Metadata`/`Value` split (PR21532) landed in r223802 -- at least, the C++ side of it. This was a rocky day, but I suppose that's what I get for failing to stage the change in smaller pieces. As of r223916 (lldb), I'm not aware of any remaining (in-tree) breakage, so if I've missed some problem in the sea of buildbot errors, please flag me down. I'll follow up soon with

...tTemporary(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Metadata*>) () from /opt/buildbot/lib/libLLVM-3.6svn.so >>> #7 0x00007ffff3426b3f in MapValueImpl(llvm::Metadata const*, llvm::ValueMap<llvm::Value const*, llvm::WeakVH, llvm::ValueMapConfig<llvm::Value const*, llvm::sys::SmartMutex<false> > >&, llvm::RemapFlags, llvm::ValueMapTypeRemapper*, llvm::ValueMaterializer*) () >>> from /opt/buildbot/lib/libLLVM-3.6svn.so >>> #8 0x00007ffff3426bd6 in MapValueImpl(llvm::Metadata const*, llvm::ValueMap<llvm::Value const*, llvm::WeakVH, llvm::ValueM...

...tg/opencl/drivers/opencl/dist/linux/debug/lib/x86/libamdoclcl32.so) ==19966== ==19966== 12 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 2 of 12 ==19966== at 0x402569A: operator new(unsigned int) (vg_replace_malloc.c:255) ==19966== by 0x5660DA0: void* llvm::object_creator<llvm::sys::SmartMutex<true> >() (ManagedStatic.h:25) ==19966== by 0x5E05AB6: llvm::ManagedStaticBase::RegisterManagedStatic(void* (*)(), void (*)(void*)) const (ManagedStatic.cpp:47) ==19966== by 0x566056A: llvm::ManagedStatic<llvm::sys::SmartMutex<true> >::operator*() (ManagedStatic.h:67) ==1...

...y(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Metadata*>) () from /opt/buildbot/lib/libLLVM-3.6svn.so > >>>> #7 0x00007ffff3426b3f in MapValueImpl(llvm::Metadata const*, llvm::ValueMap<llvm::Value const*, llvm::WeakVH, llvm::ValueMapConfig<llvm::Value const*, llvm::sys::SmartMutex<false> > >&, llvm::RemapFlags, llvm::ValueMapTypeRemapper*, llvm::ValueMaterializer*) () > >>>> from /opt/buildbot/lib/libLLVM-3.6svn.so > >>>> #8 0x00007ffff3426bd6 in MapValueImpl(llvm::Metadata const*, llvm::ValueMap<llvm::Value const*, llvm::Wea...

...:LLVMContext&, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Metadata*>) () from /opt/buildbot/lib/libLLVM-3.6svn.so >>>>>>> #7 0x00007ffff3426b3f in MapValueImpl(llvm::Metadata const*, llvm::ValueMap<llvm::Value const*, llvm::WeakVH, llvm::ValueMapConfig<llvm::Value const*, llvm::sys::SmartMutex<false> > >&, llvm::RemapFlags, llvm::ValueMapTypeRemapper*, llvm::ValueMaterializer*) () >>>>>>> from /opt/buildbot/lib/libLLVM-3.6svn.so >>>>>>> #8 0x00007ffff3426bd6 in MapValueImpl(llvm::Metadata const*, llvm::ValueMap<llvm::Value con...

...s are like this: ==26332== 40 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 5 of 10 ==26332== at 0x4C2B3F8: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==26332== by 0x165CC6C: llvm::sys::MutexImpl::MutexImpl(bool) (Mutex.cpp:49) ==26332== by 0xD41D5A: llvm::sys::SmartMutex<true>::SmartMutex(bool) (Mutex.h:94) ==26332== by 0xD3E81F: void* llvm::object_creator<llvm::sys::SmartMutex<true> >() (ManagedStatic.h:26) ==26332== by 0x165AA95: llvm::ManagedStaticBase::RegisterManagedStatic(void* (*)(), void (*)(void*)) const (ManagedStatic.cpp:50) ==263...

...er (code: http://pastebin.com/6iuHNH3Q). I am using ubuntu 12.04 with llvm version 3.1. Each thread uses a seperate LLVMContext, however the interpreter continues to crash. $ clang -S -emit-llvm test.c && parallel_lli test.s Error msg: ..../include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h:116: bool llvm::sys::SmartMutex<true>::release(): Assertion `((recursive && acquired) || (acquired == 1)) && "Lock not acquired before release!"' failed.""))) What am I doing wrong? Thank you. Diff to original tools/lli/lli.cpp and test.c (simple hello world) attached. ------------...

Hi, I am trying to parallize the lli interpreter (code: http://pastebin.com/6iuHNH3Q). I am using ubuntu 12.04 with llvm version 3.1. Each thread uses a seperate LLVMContext, however the interpreter continues to crash. Error msg: ..../include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h:116: bool llvm::sys::SmartMutex<true>::release(): Assertion `((recursive && acquired) || (acquired == 1)) && "Lock not acquired before release!"' failed.""))) What am I doing wrong? Thank you. Diff to original tools/lli/lli.cpp attached. -------------- next part -------------- ---...

...PassRegistry* PassRegistryObj = NULL; PassRegistry *PassRegistry::getPassRegistry() { - return &*PassRegistryObj; + // TODO(nipun): Handle deletion. + if (NULL == PassRegistryObj) { + PassRegistryObj = new PassRegistry(); + } + return PassRegistryObj; } -static ManagedStatic<sys::SmartMutex<true> > Lock; //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // PassRegistryImpl @@ -72,26 +77,23 @@ void *PassRegistry::getImpl() const { // PassRegistry::~PassRegistry() { - sys::SmartScopedLock<true> Guard(*Lock); PassRegistryImpl *Imp...