search for: smarter

...OLD\DENTON\ directory \Tomh\Software\COLD\DENTON\AAAA\ Error writing to tar file - No such device or address Didn't get entire file. size=499212, nread=0 Error writing tar file - No such device or address .. .. Errors Writing Tar to Disk: 195732 ( 3185.7 kb/s) \Program Files\Smarter Software\Datasets\msabyzip.txt 294912 ( 2571.4 kb/s) \Program Files\Smarter Software\Datasets\msac.dir 148407 ( 2841.7 kb/s) \Program Files\Smarter Software\Datasets\parse.dir 270848 ( 3778.6 kb/s) \Program Files\Smarter Software\Datasets\UNWISE.EXE 388833280 ( 4292.9 kb/s) \Program Fi...

...3])) Here's what x looks like: head(x) Date Open Close 1 03/30/1983 29.96 30.35 2 03/31/1983 30.35 30.24 3 04/04/1983 30.25 30.39 4 04/05/1983 30.45 30.66 5 04/06/1983 30.85 30.85 6 04/07/1983 30.85 31.12 -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/There-must-be-a-smarter-way-tp3243651p3243651.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi There, There are 300 boy students and 100 girl students in a class. One interesting question is whether boy is smarter than girl or not. first given the exam with a difficulty level 1, the number of the student who got A is below 31 for boy, 10 for girl. Then we increase the difficulty level of the exam to level 2, the number of the student who got A is below 32 for boy, 10 for girl. We did this 10 times, we got...

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > IMHO, This doesn't make a lot of sense to turn off this part on it's own. > I would just use the enable-pre flag to turn off scalar PRE, as it > will cause the same issue in other cases as well. > Is there some reason you aren't just doing that? > I suspect if this is a performance

...gt; > Lawrence Hu > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lawrence [mailto:lawrence at codeaurora.org] > Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 9:36 PM > To: 'Daniel Berlin' > Cc: 'LLVM Developers Mailing List' > Subject: RE: Register pressure mechanism in PRE or Smarter rematerialization/split/spiller/coalescing ? > > Hi, Daniel: > > Thanks, I tried that patch you provided, it is better than just disabling your previous patch, it has more improvements than degradations. > > Do you want to post that patch or you want me to do that? > > Regar...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11800 Bug ID: 11800 Summary: smarter "safe" symlink detection Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:...

Hi, This patch make libogg detection a bit smarter if you're trying to cross-compile. What I want is to be able cross-compile Speex without OGG - right now it is not possible without som hacking of Speex build scripts, because if cross-compiling enabled speex silently assume that you have libogg compiled and installed. Such behaviour was used (...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7870 Summary: --link-dest=${SRC} ${SRC} ${DST} can be smarter Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: weerd+rsync at weirdnet.nl...

...2016, at 11:30 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > Hi Wei, > > I've not seen GCC's SCEV so I cannot make a comparative comment here > (maybe Chris, Andy or Dan can chime in here), but I personally am in > the "make the cleanup passes smarter" camp. We can also try to make > SCEV expansion smarter -- not by putting more things in SCEVExpander > (it is already complex enough!), but by splitting out a dedicated > SCEVSimplifier that you invoke on code generated from SCEVExpander to > strength reduce it. SCEVSimplifier c...

...ithpointers.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Wei, >>> >>> I've not seen GCC's SCEV so I cannot make a comparative comment here >>> (maybe Chris, Andy or Dan can chime in here), but I personally am in >>> the "make the cleanup passes smarter" camp. We can also try to make >>> SCEV expansion smarter -- not by putting more things in SCEVExpander >>> (it is already complex enough!), but by splitting out a dedicated >>> SCEVSimplifier that you invoke on code generated from SCEVExpander to >>> s...

Hi, i have one centos 4.3 box, exposed to the internet. since several weeks ago, i found numerous attemps to connect through SSH, but failed. they tried with many username, including root. it's comes from different IP. some of them are foreign website. How do i make my centos become smarter in handling this kind of attacks. eventhough i've disable all the user accounts, left only the admin accounts. making the password so hard, longer and combining alphabet, numbers and characters... yet i dont want the attackers keep on trying. any suggestions? thanks in advance.

...to turn off scalar PRE, as it > will cause the same issue in other cases as well. > Is there some reason you aren't just doing that? > I suspect if this is a performance win, that would be as well. > > Also note that you will have the same problem as GVN/EarlyCSE/etc > becomes smarter, as these are full redundancies being eliminated (IE > there is no insertion happening). It just happens that PRE notices > them and GVN doesn't, because GVN is dominator based and PRE is not. > A slightly smarter GVN/EarlyCSE would do the same thing. > > > Given what you are...

I'm not sure Bery (the author) is subscribed here; he's probably the best one to ask first. Josh --- Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net> wrote: > Hi all - > > Hope this isn't too OT - I've been playing with the file extention > mapper VFS module for samba (http://file-ext-map.sourceforge.net/) to > play flac files on my Audiotron. The above module takes any

I'm having a problem with Asterisk picking up the Zap/1 and thinking its a new call when instead I've already been on the phone talking to a person. This is not my ideal setup and currently I have just an FXO card and Asterisk is in parallel with my phone system instead of being in the front. I'm not sure if the problem would be fixed by adding an FXS card and putting my phones on

A last week there was a message about using Samba with HP Jetdirect cards. The Jetdirect cards don't multithread, so when samba does an lpq- there is a "hang time" for the client. I understand that. But, why is NT smart enough to put a message in the event log saying that the printer is busy as where *unix/samba causes the client to page me or come to my desk and wine "How

Friends, To update you on recent changes in svn trunk, I can inform you that we now have ever smarter ways to handle media streams in Asterisk than we do in 1.2 for the IAX2 and SIP protocols. * IAX2: Splitting signalling and media apart Starting with the IAX2 protocol, we now have the ability to transfer media streams to go directly between IAX2 servers and keep the signalling path. Before,...

Hi all - Hope this isn't too OT - I've been playing with the file extention mapper VFS module for samba (http://file-ext-map.sourceforge.net/) to play flac files on my Audiotron. The above module takes any *.flac file and presents it as a *.wav to the client, and decodes on the fly when the file is read. It seems to work pretty well, but I often get the first second or so of a song

...ht yet, will ask soon. http://reviews.llvm.org/D11234 Thanks again. Lawrence Hu -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Berlin [mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 7:48 AM To: Lawrence Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: Register pressure mechanism in PRE or Smarter rematerialization/split/spiller/coalescing ? On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Lawrence <lawrence at codeaurora.org> wrote: > I thought about a little bit more, I think adding Register pressure control in your patch or PRE may be the only choice. > > Because at least for this case I...

On 1 July 2015 at 11:34, Russell Wallace <russell.wallace at gmail.com> wrote: > Why do you say spin? You're dismissing all use-cases other than this very narrow one I'd (with my own spin) characterise as "Do What I Mean, I Can't Be Bothered To Get My Code Right". Fair enough, you're arguing in favour of a point; but it's not one I agree with. Tim.

...s wahrscheinlich sicherer, sie zuerst in einer Datei zu speichern und diese Datei danach mit einem Texteditor zu ?ffnen. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Chris Blunt" <chris.blunt@entropy-it.com> Subject: [asterisk-users] Is there a smarter way to ban expensive calls in dial plan? Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 15:16:04 +0100 Size: 13329 Url: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060801/c141f780/attachment.eml