search for: slw

Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw at zxy.spb.ru> writes: > IMHO, ntp.conf need to include some numeric IP of public ntp servers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTP_server_misuse_and_abuse https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poul-Henning_Kamp#Dispute_with_D-Link DES -- Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav - des at des.no

Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw at zxy.spb.ru> writes: > IMHO, ntp.conf need to include some numeric IP of public ntp servers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTP_server_misuse_and_abuse https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poul-Henning_Kamp#Dispute_with_D-Link DES -- Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav - des at des.no

Default install with local_unbound and ntpd can't be functional with incorrect date/time in BIOS: Unbound requred correct time for DNSSEC check and refuseing queries ("Jul 1 20:17:29 yellowrat unbound: [3444:0] info: failed to prime trust anchor -- DNSKEY rrset is not secure . DNSKEY IN") ntpd don't have any numeric IP of ntp servers in ntp.conf -- only symbolic names like

Default install with local_unbound and ntpd can't be functional with incorrect date/time in BIOS: Unbound requred correct time for DNSSEC check and refuseing queries ("Jul 1 20:17:29 yellowrat unbound: [3444:0] info: failed to prime trust anchor -- DNSKEY rrset is not secure . DNSKEY IN") ntpd don't have any numeric IP of ntp servers in ntp.conf -- only symbolic names like

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Francois Pichet" <pichet2000 at gmail.com> > > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > > Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 5:34:11 PM > > Subject: [LLVMdev] Question about shouldMergeGEPs in

On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC). > Under high network load and may be addtional conditional system go to > unresponsible state -- no reaction to network and console (USB IPMI > emulation). INVARIANTS give to high overhad. Is this exist some way to > debug this? Can you panic it from console to get to db> to get

...better job now, but for an > irrelevant reason, so to stick with the code you generated, we have: > > .LBB0_1: # %for.body > # =>This Inner Loop Header: > Depth=1 > slw 8, 5, 4 > ld 9, .LC1 at toc@l(7) > addi 5, 5, 4 > add 8, 8, 6 > extsw 8, 8 > sldi 8, 8, 2 > lwzx 8, 9, 8 > addi 9, 3, 16 > stw 8, 0(3) > mr 3, 9 > bdnz .LBB0_1 > > there are two things wrong here, first: > > ld 9, .LC1 at toc@l(7) > > th...

...Tx&4h0f)46;*<zK zKoC;J?<eHfR{0vJMZ!`{{!LW#_)CN?#a%<e;bE}_OUfk)nTdH~dYUB`?j~J4D?j1o zSeJw>Q8cODp3o5-IvZ^_F|Uz!6JAv%{EVi{Z)6qAN19evi-fHB9MN84ZgHvkp50c( z#NH-miqh_G-deBR=)})JgpKrtO0hC|cVBoYY+%#G+PjCmLmGR?+NF<I*xtD8i{+S< znIBuQ$xqm#&*Cn6+{UW?BXC at zLSLJeH+pF)-9u(tOxuD>&sLW-U3hd6%Seg?kcJ(M zb?u7-QEw_YvXbIkdX}oaN)55K$%M<ymiwIBipvZJ(~GT at _Vz}qv}*4NU3l~LM)Vo5 zQC%-q>lJPPn1)kyDAv`m3$CoVyceH(oaOee7M4G_3IzjUDt~}!{*G8281?W_jGLJj zz!~tD`OI$)IaR at s{~w}!puhYLPd{mDwP0msR@`%BagG-~xzrQ#msbg?7FGBo=Hs+N z_&w5mNtENkh8?m#t;Wddo^EE(x?0~TT6iK>**naJ?F@;sJykw=*0SC(njaB8-Q...

I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC). Under high network load and may be addtional conditional system go to unresponsible state -- no reaction to network and console (USB IPMI emulation). INVARIANTS give to high overhad. Is this exist some way to debug this?