search for: slv1

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "slv1".

Did you mean: lv1
2011 Sep 17
0
Warning in 'probtrans'-function ('mstate'-package)
...v3.2 + (v1.3 + v2.3) * v3.3 + strata(trans), SLV, method = "breslow") summary(cox1) # 'cloned' data for making predictions: specific covariate 'v3' fixed at 0 (& 1): SLV0 <- SLV[1:3,] SLV0$v3.1 <- 0 SLV0$v3.2 <- 0 SLV0$v3.3 <- 0 SLV0$strata <- 1:3 SLV1 <- SLV0 SLV1$v3.1 <- 1 SLV1$v3.2 <- 1 SLV1$v3.3 <- 1 # estimate... msf.0 <- msfit(cox1, SLV0, trans=tmat) pt.0 <- probtrans(msf.0, predt=0) # [..output:] # Warning message: # In probtrans(msf.0, predt = 0) : # Warning! Negative diagonal elements of (I+dA); the...
2012 Mar 24
1
Solving the equation using uniroot
Hello all, I was going to solve (n-m)! * (n-k)! = 0.5 *n! * (n-m-k)! for m when values of n and k are provided n1<-c(10,13,18,30,60,100,500)         # values of n kx<-seq(1,7,1);                               # values of k slv2<-lapply(n1,function(n){    slv1<-lapply(kx,function(k){              lhs<-function(m)              {                 fnk<-factorial(n-m)*factorial(n-k)-                       0.5*factorial(n-m-k)*factorial(n);                 return(fnk);              }              un2<-uniroot(lhs,c(0,n))              un1<-un2$ro...
2019 Jan 31
2
[RFC] migrating past C++11
...e buildbots. I audited *all* bots in http://lab.llvm.org:8011/buildslaves (there's so many!). Some of them are down, I therefore have no idea what they run. Here are the bots that will definitely break, with their maintainers: > > Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> > am1i-slv1 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 > as-bldslv4 -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > ps4-buildslave2 -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > > Hexagon QA <llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com> > hexagon-build-02 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 &...
2019 Feb 02
2
[RFC] migrating past C++11
...laves> (there's so many!). Some of them are down, I therefore have no idea what they run. Here are the bots that will definitely break, with their maintainers: >>> >>> Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com <mailto:gkistanova at gmail.com>> >>> am1i-slv1 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 >>> as-bldslv4 -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) >>> ps4-buildslave2 -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) >>> >>> Hexagon QA <llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com <mailto:llvm.buildmaster at qu...
2019 Feb 07
5
[RFC] migrating past C++11
...lab.llvm.org:8011/buildslaves> (there's so many!). Some of them are down, I therefore have no idea what they run. Here are the bots that will definitely break, with their maintainers: > > Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com <mailto:gkistanova at gmail.com>> > am1i-slv1 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 > as-bldslv4 -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > ps4-buildslave2 -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > > Hexagon QA <llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com <mailto:llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com>> > hexagon-b...
2019 Jan 26
4
[RFC] migrating past C++11
+1, thanks again for driving this. On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 3:57 PM JF Bastien via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > The discussion seems to have died down and gotten good consensus. I’ve > therefore create a patch which applies the proposed soft-errors: > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D57264 > > > We’ll only migrate to hard-error (and start using new