search for: slot2

Hi, The man page for new() suggests that if 'a' is an object with slots "slot1" and "slot2" and C is a class that extends the class of 'a', then the 2 following calls should be equivalent: new("C", a, ...) new("C", slot1=a at slot1, slot2=a at slot2, ...) This is generally the case but I just ran into a situation where it's not. In the followi...

...chler wrote: >>>>>> Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> >>>>>> on Tue, 12 May 2015 15:18:42 -0700 writes: > >> Hi, > >> The man page for new() suggests that if 'a' is an object with slots >> "slot1" and "slot2" and C is a class that extends the class of 'a', >> then the 2 following calls should be equivalent: > >> new("C", a, ...) >> new("C", slot1=a at slot1, slot2=a at slot2, ...) > >> This is generally the case but I just ran into...

...writes: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>> >>> The man page for new() suggests that if 'a' is an object >>> with slots >>>> "slot1" and "slot2" and C is a class that extends the >>>> class of 'a', then the 2 following calls should be >>>> equivalent: >>>> >>> >>> new("C", a, ...) >>>> new("C", slot1=a at slot1, slot...

>>>>> Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> >>>>> on Tue, 12 May 2015 15:18:42 -0700 writes: > Hi, > The man page for new() suggests that if 'a' is an object with slots > "slot1" and "slot2" and C is a class that extends the class of 'a', > then the 2 following calls should be equivalent: > new("C", a, ...) > new("C", slot1=a at slot1, slot2=a at slot2, ...) > This is generally the case but I just ran into a situation where it's...

...version. press # to reset. google more info, bam ch33s3d ; Bell Canada Vista 350 450 390 480 FDN 0x0000000F ; Descriptor number -bc350-d SECURITY 0xB288072A ; Security code -bc350-d ;FDN 0x01000002 ; Descriptor number -bc350-SL (slot2) ;SECURITY 0xD886020C ; Security code -bc350-SL (slot2) ;FDN 0x01000003 ; Descriptor number -bc350-s1 (slot3) ;SECURITY 0xF299022E ; Security code -bc350-s1 (slot3) ;FDN 0x01000004 ; Descriptor number -bc350-s2...

...org> >>>>>>> on Tue, 12 May 2015 15:18:42 -0700 writes: >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> Hi, >>> >> >> The man page for new() suggests that if 'a' is an object with slots >>> "slot1" and "slot2" and C is a class that extends the class of 'a', >>> then the 2 following calls should be equivalent: >>> >> >> new("C", a, ...) >>> new("C", slot1=a at slot1, slot2=a at slot2, ...) >>> >> >> This...

...f this class some values will be displayed. Then R will ask for **press Enter**. Once user presses enter then, remaining values will be displayed. In the following example, I try to explain this concept. > setClass("MyClass", sealed = FALSE, representation(Slot1 = "vector", Slot2 = "vector")) [1] "MyClass" > > setMethod("show", "MyClass", definition = function(x) { + cat("These are the values. Please press enter to see the values.\n") + ####### User will presss the Enter ########## + ####...

I need some help in defining a "print" method for my new S4 class definition. So fer I have worked like this: setClass("MyClass", sealed=F, representation(slot1 = "list", #create a new class slot2 = "vector", slot3 = "vector", slot4 = "vector")) setMethod("print", "MyClass", function(x) { #set up print method for that cat("My Method definition.\n") }) newObject <- new(&quot...

Dear all, I am having problem to create a package when this package is supposed to have some newly created s4 class. Here is my workout: > #rm(list = ls()) > setClass("aClass", sealed=T, representation(slot1 = "vector", slot2 = "character")) [1] "aClass" > fn1 <- function(x, y, z) { + x <- x[1] + y <- y[1] + z <- as.character(z[1]) + new("aClass", slot1 = x+y, slot2 = z) + } > #fn1(1,2,3) > package.skeleton("trial11") Creating directories ... Creating DESCRIPT...

I'm curious how does hexagon hardware decide which slot to use for a given instruction? Is there special hardware to make that decision? I'm asking because I didn't see any information about which slot to use for a given packet. Is it even possible to pass this kind of information through assembly? Say hardware sees a packet and the packet tells it which slot to use. I would greatly

...ven slot, which currently requires me to handle the fragmentation explicitly. For example: ...==|== slot 1 ==|=== slot 2 ===|==... Now assume that contents of slot 1 is replaced with a larger chunk of data. I must either append additional data e.g. at the end of the file ...==|== slot 1a =|=== slot2 ===|==...==|=== slot1b ==| (and add my own data structures and code infrastructure to read fragmented slots) or leave the old (defunct) slot 1 data in place and garbage collect it later: ...==|= deadbeef =|=== slot2 ===|==...==|====== slot1' =====| It's my impression that mechanisms fo...

I get this error no matter what I do. I've tried switching to different locations on the TDM400p to no avail. I've got the card setup with the green module in slot1 and red in slot2. My config files are exactly like the "Configure Dev-Kit PCI (TDM11B)" example. http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=configuration#TDM11B When I run ztcfg -v, I get: 2 channels configured. ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6) Please advise. jeff##at##...

...in the packet are encoded "in reverse", > i.e. the instruction that will go to the highest slot will be encoded > first, then the instruction that will go to the second highest slot, etc. > In case of a packet with 4 instructions, it will be > addr: slot3 > addr+4: slot2 > addr+8: slot1 > addr+12: slot0 > Not all slots have to be occupied. If they are not, the hardware will > assign the slots based on the instruction, but within a packet the slots > must be in a decreasing order. For example: > addr: slot2 > addr+4: slot0 > is...

'methods' package feature request / discussion starter: perhaps a call to 'validObject' should occur at part of any slot replacement operation (and the operation not be carried out if it would invalidate the object)? this may prevent the need for prophylactic 'validObject' calls in other user-defined functions. in the example below, the slot assignment occurs

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on

This patch set is for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on native

This patch set is for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on native