search for: slimy

...very hard-nosed individuals on this list can be, or have become. > > Regards, Mark. > > still to wait. > > Duncan Murdoch-2 wrote: > > > > On 2/4/2009 3:53 PM, Mark Difford wrote: > >>>> >>> Indeed. The postings exuded a tabloid-esque level of slimy > >>>>>> nastiness. > >> > >> Hi Rolf, > >> > >> It is good to have clarification, for you wrote "..,the postings...," > >> tarring everyone with the same brush. And it was quite a nasty brush. It > >> also is con...

...rove it. "simple logic" my foot. Go peddle your lies elsewhere please. The *only* vendor that dropped Samba over GPLv3 was Apple, who have religious objections to *any* GPL software, and are busily re-writing anything containing it. As is their right of course. I'm not letting these slimy insinuations go unchallenged.

In another thread on this list, various wild allegations have been made, relating to the New York Times article on R. I object both to the subject line and to the content of several of the messages, and will not repeat or quote any of that content. It smacks to me of mischief making. Discussion has centered around the following quote from the NY Times article: ?According to them, the

Dan Gohman wrote: > On Sep 11, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > >> Devang's work on debug info prompted this, thoughts welcome: >> http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/ExtensibleMetadata.txt > > The document mentions "instructions" a lot. We'll want to be able to > apply metadata to ConstantExprs as well at least, if not also Arguments >

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 06:15:30PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 12.03.2016 um 18:08 schrieb Sketch: > >On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > >>GPLv3 should guarentee that you can replace the Samba > >>on *any* device. That's the whole point of GPLv3 - no > >>DRM. > >> > >>If you find a Samba device using any

Hi, I''m completely new to all of this. Not even certain this is an appropriate forum for an installation question. I''m just about to plunk down some money to get a virtual server. In looking over the list of isp''s elsewhere on this site, goDaddy isn''t mentioned - probably because they don''t offer rails as a standard distribution. There are some

I got some weird mail back, claiming that my e-mail was blocked, w/o indicating what server was blocked, after the mail appeared in the mailing list. Is this some BS shakedown? I use postfix on a DSL line forwarding to earthlink, this is hardly something that should be rare in the BSD world... the mail appeared to come from a web mail server and the first link has the following lovely text:

...ss::Base instead of just Class, you can pretty much usually find what you want if you know what you''re looking for. But this is a terrible way to learn the framework. Which brings us to the section "Books." Ah, the REAL manual. Let''s set aside that it feels a little slimy to start in on a "free" application framework and a very slick "free" video demo and read a bunch of free O''Reilly tutorials only to find out, when it gets down to brass tacks, you''re going to have to shell out $35 for a linear, rational, comprehensive over...

hi all... again... i sent this message to general questions but nobody got excited about it. i just installed 6 on my t30 laptop. brand new. when trying dhclient i get: DHCPDISCOVER on fxp0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 5 this trys 6 times then this shows up: No DHCPOFFERS received. No working leases in present database - sleeping. i run a tcpdump while requesting a lease and for