search for: sleep_for_bwlimit

...t we actually wait at least + * the requested number of microseconds, this can become grossly + * inaccurate. We therefore keep a cumulating number of microseconds + * to wait, and only actually perform the sleep when the rouding + * becomes insignificant. (less than 10%) -- REW. **/ static void sleep_for_bwlimit(int bytes_written) { struct timeval tv; + static int time_to_sleep = 0; if (!bwlimit) return; @@ -427,9 +436,13 @@ assert(bytes_written > 0); assert(bwlimit > 0); - tv.tv_usec = bytes_written * 1000 / bwlimit; - tv.tv_sec = tv.tv_usec / 1000000; - tv.tv_usec = tv.tv_usec %...

...t we actually wait at least + * the requested number of microseconds, this can become grossly + * inaccurate. We therefore keep a cumulating number of microseconds + * to wait, and only actually perform the sleep when the rouding + * becomes insignificant. (less than 10%) -- REW. **/ static void sleep_for_bwlimit(int bytes_written) { struct timeval tv; + static int time_to_sleep = 0; if (!bwlimit) return; @@ -427,9 +436,12 @@ assert(bytes_written > 0); assert(bwlimit > 0); - tv.tv_usec = bytes_written * 1000 / bwlimit; - tv.tv_sec = tv.tv_usec / 1000000; - tv.tv_usec = tv.tv_usec %...

...OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: rlaager at wiktel.com QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org The --bwlimit option seems to use KiB/s, as io.c's sleep_for_bwlimit() function divides by 1024. It's documented as "KBPS", "KBytes per second", and "kilobytes per second". I'm going to attach a patch which standardizes all of this as KiB/s and "kibibytes per second", to match the actual usage. Given that this is a n...

We've been using rsync to send updates to our webservers from a central location for years. All the webservers used to be Windows 2000 Server running rsync 2.6.3. Recently I've been trying to replace them with Debian servers with rsync 2.6.9. The central file server is a Windows 2000 Server using the cwRsync binary. It was also 2.6.3 until I upgraded it to use 2.6.9 also. The initial

...60); + + return ( tv.tv_sec > expiration_time ) ? 1 : 0; +} /** * Write len bytes to the file descriptor @p fd. @@ -772,6 +793,7 @@ fd_set w_fds, r_fds; int fd_count, count; struct timeval tv; + int time_expired = 0; msg_list_push(NORMAL_FLUSH); @@ -837,6 +859,14 @@ } sleep_for_bwlimit(ret); + if( timelimit ) { + time_expired = has_timelimit_expired(); + if( 1 == time_expired ) { + rprintf(FERROR, RSYNC_NAME ": \n%d minute time limit exceeded.\n", timelimit); + exit_cleanup(RERR_PARTIAL); + } + } + total += ret; diff -urN rsync-2.6.1pre...

...time(NULL); + + return ( now > stop_time_secs ) ? 1 : 0; +} /** * Write len bytes to the file descriptor @p fd. @@ -772,6 +825,7 @@ fd_set w_fds, r_fds; int fd_count, count; struct timeval tv; + int time_expired = 0; msg_list_push(NORMAL_FLUSH); @@ -837,6 +891,19 @@ } sleep_for_bwlimit(ret); + + if( timelimit ) { + time_expired = has_timelimit_expired(); + if( 1 == time_expired ) { + rprintf(FERROR, RSYNC_NAME ": \n%d minute time limit exceeded.\n", timelimit); + exit_cleanup(RERR_PARTIAL); + } + } + + if( stopat && has_stopat_expired() )...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2654 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-04-27 02:21 ------- The generator's setting of the ignore_timeout