search for: sldt

Stop using extra underscores on asm and volatiles, that is just silly. Also, make lgdt/lidt/sgdt/sldt explicitly "l". Patch-base: 2.6.13-rc5-mm1 Patch-keys: i386 desc cleanup Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Index: linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/mach-default/mach_desc.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.13.orig/include/a...

Stop using extra underscores on asm and volatiles, that is just silly. Also, make lgdt/lidt/sgdt/sldt explicitly "l". Patch-base: 2.6.13-rc5-mm1 Patch-keys: i386 desc cleanup Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Index: linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/mach-default/mach_desc.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.13.orig/include/a...

Stop using extra underscores on asm and volatiles, that is just silly. Also, make lgdt/lidt/sgdt/sldt explicitly "l". Index: linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/desc.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.13.orig/include/asm-i386/desc.h 2005-08-08 17:10:49.000000000 -0700 +++ linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/desc.h 2005-08-08 17:15:46.000000000 -0700 @@...

Stop using extra underscores on asm and volatiles, that is just silly. Also, make lgdt/lidt/sgdt/sldt explicitly "l". Index: linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/desc.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.13.orig/include/asm-i386/desc.h 2005-08-08 17:10:49.000000000 -0700 +++ linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/desc.h 2005-08-08 17:15:46.000000000 -0700 @@...

...atile("lldt %0"::"mr" (ldt)) - -#define store_gdt(dtr) asm ("sgdtl %0":"=m" (*dtr)) -#define store_idt(dtr) asm ("sidtl %0":"=m" (*dtr)) -#define store_tr(tr) asm ("str %0":"=mr" (tr)) -#define store_ldt(ldt) asm ("sldt %0":"=mr" (ldt)) - /* * This is the ldt that every process will get unless we need * something other than this. @@ -99,22 +86,10 @@ "1" (limit)); \ } while(0) -#define set_base(desc,base) _set_base((desc), (base)) -#define set_limit(desc,limit) _set_lim...

...atile("lldt %0"::"mr" (ldt)) - -#define store_gdt(dtr) asm ("sgdtl %0":"=m" (*dtr)) -#define store_idt(dtr) asm ("sidtl %0":"=m" (*dtr)) -#define store_tr(tr) asm ("str %0":"=mr" (tr)) -#define store_ldt(ldt) asm ("sldt %0":"=mr" (ldt)) - /* * This is the ldt that every process will get unless we need * something other than this. @@ -99,22 +86,10 @@ "1" (limit)); \ } while(0) -#define set_base(desc,base) _set_base((desc), (base)) -#define set_limit(desc,limit) _set_lim...

...dt %0"::"mr" (ldt)) - -#define store_gdt(dtr) __asm__ ("sgdt %0":"=m" (*dtr)) -#define store_idt(dtr) __asm__ ("sidt %0":"=m" (*dtr)) -#define store_tr(tr) __asm__ ("str %0":"=mr" (tr)) -#define store_ldt(ldt) __asm__ ("sldt %0":"=mr" (ldt)) - /* * This is the ldt that every process will get unless we need * something other than this. */ extern struct desc_struct default_ldt[]; +extern struct desc_struct idt_table[]; extern void set_intr_gate(unsigned int irq, void * addr); -#define _set_tssld...

...dt %0"::"mr" (ldt)) - -#define store_gdt(dtr) __asm__ ("sgdt %0":"=m" (*dtr)) -#define store_idt(dtr) __asm__ ("sidt %0":"=m" (*dtr)) -#define store_tr(tr) __asm__ ("str %0":"=mr" (tr)) -#define store_ldt(ldt) __asm__ ("sldt %0":"=mr" (ldt)) - /* * This is the ldt that every process will get unless we need * something other than this. */ extern struct desc_struct default_ldt[]; +extern struct desc_struct idt_table[]; extern void set_intr_gate(unsigned int irq, void * addr); -#define _set_tssld...

...add $0x14,%esp Code; 8015b72c <journal_revoke+bc/15c> a: 8d 74 26 00 lea 0x0(%esi,1),%esi Code; 8015b730 <journal_revoke+c0/15c> e: b8 0f 00 00 00 mov $0xf,%eax Code; 8015b735 <journal_revoke+c5/15c> 13: 0f 00 00 sldt (%eax) 1 warning issued. Results may not be reliable.

Chris Wright wrote: >* Zachary Amsden (zach@vmware.com) wrote: > > >>Does Xen assume page aligned descriptor tables? I assume from this >> >> > >Yes. > > > >>patch and snippets I have gathered from others, that is a yes, and other >>things here imply that DT pages are not shadowed. If so, Xen itself >>must have live segments

Chris Wright wrote: >* Zachary Amsden (zach@vmware.com) wrote: > > >>Does Xen assume page aligned descriptor tables? I assume from this >> >> > >Yes. > > > >>patch and snippets I have gathered from others, that is a yes, and other >>things here imply that DT pages are not shadowed. If so, Xen itself >>must have live segments

(Andrew, please sit these in the -mm tree for cooking) Create a paravirt.h header for (almost) all the critical operations which need to be replaced with hypervisor calls. For the moment, this simply includes no_paravirt.h, where all the native implementations now live. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>

(Andrew, please sit these in the -mm tree for cooking) Create a paravirt.h header for (almost) all the critical operations which need to be replaced with hypervisor calls. For the moment, this simply includes no_paravirt.h, where all the native implementations now live. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>

Hi there i am trying to run nokia pc suite on wine 20031212. this the only output i become. 0 19:44:45 sammy@uranos:~ $ wine --debugmsg fixme-all nokia.exe wine: Unhandled exception (thread 0040), starting debugger... WineDbg starting on pid 25 Loaded debug information from ELF 'wine' ((nil)) No debug information in 32bit DLL 'C:\Program Files\Common

Hi all, I've been looking at finding common ground between the VMI, Xen and other paravirtualization approaches, and after some discussion, we're getting somewhere. These first two patches are the fundamentals, stolen mainly from the VMI patches: removing assumptions about the kernel running in ring 0, and macro-izing all the obvious para-virtualize-needing insns. The third patch is

Hi all, I've been looking at finding common ground between the VMI, Xen and other paravirtualization approaches, and after some discussion, we're getting somewhere. These first two patches are the fundamentals, stolen mainly from the VMI patches: removing assumptions about the kernel running in ring 0, and macro-izing all the obvious para-virtualize-needing insns. The third patch is

...popl SAVED_GREG(flags) + +#endif + + mov %ds, REF(saved_ds) + mov %es, REF(saved_es) + mov %fs, REF(saved_fs) + mov %gs, REF(saved_gs) + mov %ss, REF(saved_ss) + + sgdt REF(saved_gdt) + sidt REF(saved_idt) + sldt REF(saved_ldt) + + mov %cr0, GREG(ax) + mov GREG(ax), REF(saved_cr0) + + mov %cr3, GREG(ax) + mov GREG(ax), REF(saved_cr3) + + call save_rest_processor_state + +#if defined(__x86_64__) + + mov $3, %rdi + xor %eax, %eax +...

Hi, this is a series of patches that unify the struct desc_struct and friends across x86_64 and i386. As usual, it provides paravirt capabilities as a side-effect for x86_64. I consider the main goal, namely, of unifying the desc_struct, an ongoing effort, being this the beginning. A lot of old code has to be touched to accomplish that. I don't consider this patch ready for inclusion.

Hi, this is a series of patches that unify the struct desc_struct and friends across x86_64 and i386. As usual, it provides paravirt capabilities as a side-effect for x86_64. I consider the main goal, namely, of unifying the desc_struct, an ongoing effort, being this the beginning. A lot of old code has to be touched to accomplish that. I don't consider this patch ready for inclusion.

...dt %0"::"mr" (ldt)) + +#define store_gdt(dtr) __asm__ ("sgdt %0":"=m" (*dtr)) +#define store_idt(dtr) __asm__ ("sidt %0":"=m" (*dtr)) +#define store_tr(tr) __asm__ ("str %0":"=mr" (tr)) +#define store_ldt(ldt) __asm__ ("sldt %0":"=mr" (ldt)) + +/* + * Load a segment. Fall back on loading the zero + * segment if something goes wrong.. + */ +#define loadsegment(seg,value) \ + asm volatile("\n" \ + "1:\t" \ + "mov %0,%%" #seg &qu...