Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "slcc".
Did you mean:
scc
2009 Oct 21
4
Security updates for Centos 5.3
Hello,
Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with Centos
5.3 x_64.
Thank you in advance and greetings
SLCC
-----------------------------------------
Este mensaje y cualquier archivo que se adjunte al mismo es
propiedad de Grupo Iusacell y contiene informacion privada y
privilegiada para uso exclusivo del destinatario. Si usted recibe
esta comunicacion por error, no esta autorizado para copiar,
retrans...
2002 May 02
2
Rversion.h
Our current intention is to no longer include Rversion.h from R.h as from
R 1.6.0 (which is months away).
Package maintainers when revising code might like to check if they
actually use Rversion.h, and if so include it explicitly.
I did a quick grep through the CRAN packages, and in all but one case
(mda) the test is for R < 1.2.0, so it may be simplest just to tidy up
and add `Depends: R
2001 Sep 01
1
RE: [R] GUI support from R
...such as threads, etc. may get in the way in thinking about how Gtk
bindings relate to, Tcl/Tk, Java, and other GUI toolkits. It would be
nice to have a level of abstraction above these toolkits with the
ability to select one and use the same code for all.
My "hope" is to be able to use Slcc to programmatically generate
bindings for Gtk. This will be easier given that I know
my way around some of the Gtk code. However, if it works,
applying the same programmatic approach to wxWindows
should give us 80% of the grunt work for free and then
require some tinkering later.
Importantly, the...
2003 Oct 10
1
number of arguments in .Call function registration
I initially sent this to the biocore mailing list - but it was
suggested that r-devel would also find it interesting.
Many of us use a macro like
#define CALL_DEF(fname, nargs) { #fname, (DL_FUNC)&fname, nargs}
for use in function registration for use with .Call.
For example, using the example from R Extension manual,
if we want to register a C function myCall with three arguments, we