Displaying 20 results from an estimated 36 matches for "slabinfo".
2004 Apr 19
16
Firewall sizing guidelines?
I have just completed the installation of a new firewall running
Shorewall 1.4 on Mandrake 9.2 for our campus network. It appears to
be running fairly well so far, but is generating significantly more log
entries than our previous linux 2.0.x firewall...
Our previous firewall enjoyed more than 6 years of 24/7 operation with
no downtime before we finally decided it needed more horsepower, and
2004 Oct 07
1
kmem_cache_destroy: Can't free all objects
...reate my own inode functions alloc_inode() &
destroy_inode().
The problem causes when destroying slab cache at removing my module (rmmod).
kmem_cache_destroy: Can't free all objects
What I do:
- install my module (insmod)
- Mount filesystem
- list the mountpoint with ls -i
- cat /proc/slabinfo shows:
my_ii_cache 1 7 512 1 1 1
- I make umnount
- cat /proc/slabinfo shows:
my_ii_cache 4 14 512 1 2 1
Where did 4 came from?
I believe it should be 0.
- Then I remove module (rmmod):
when callong function kmem_cache_destroy() I...
2004 Dec 24
0
dst cache overflow in 2.6.8
...this error means that the routing cache filled up. The
maximum size of the routing cache can be set by changing
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/max_size. The default on my mandrake install is
32768.
The current size of the routing cache can apparently be determined by "grep
ip_dst_cache /proc/slabinfo". On my router this value is slowly, but
constantly, trending upwards at all times. However, if I list the cache
with "route -Cn", or "cat /proc/net/rt_cache", I see significantly fewer
entries than what slabinfo reports.
Two things have changed since the time when my...
2018 Jul 27
7
Finding memory usage
I have a CentOS 7 server that is running out of memory and I can't
figure out why.
Running "free -h" gives me this:
????????????? total??????? used??????? free????? shared? buff/cache??
available
Mem:?????????? 3.4G??????? 2.4G??????? 123M??????? 5.9M???????
928M??????? 626M
Swap:????????? 1.9G??????? 294M??????? 1.6G
The problem is that I can't find 2.4G of usage.? If I look
2002 Feb 14
1
[BUG] [PATCH]: handling bad inodes in 2.4.x kernels
...ls are affected)
and causes the names_cache to get confused.
however, it is actually not a bug in ext[23] but in vfs layer.
you can easily reproduce this effect by making an inode bad using debugfs
(or using a bad one if you have, of course) and open() it with the flag
O_CREAT set. watching /proc/slabinfo will show you the weirdness.
consider /tmp/bad is a bad inode:
# cd /tmp
# ls | grep bad
bad
# cat bad
cat: bad: Input/output error
# cat /proc/slabinfo | grep names
names_cache 0 2 4096 0 2 1 : 2 333 2 0 0
# echo foo >bad
sh: bad: Input/output error
# cat /proc/slabinfo | grep names
names_cach...
2005 Oct 18
4
dom0 oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x1d
I had the dom0 which unfortunately didn''t have a console on it hit a
race condition and saw oom errors on it also. This happened after it was
running for over 36 hours with a domU whose load average was avg was
around 3 most of the time.
changeset: 7396:9b51e7637676
Dom0 - UP i686, Centos 4.1, 768 megs
domU-1 92 megs snmpd
domU-2 92 megs snmpdd
domU-3 410 megs postgres, tomcat 5.5,
2007 Feb 15
2
Re: [Linux-HA] OCFS2 - Memory hog?
...what version of ocfs2 has the fix?
If it was a leak would the process not be more gradual and continuous?
It would continue to eat into swap no? And if it was a leak would the
ram be freed when ocfs was unmounted?
Is there a command that shows what is using the kernel memory?
Here is what /proc/slabinfo shows (cut down for formatting). I don't
understand how to read this so maybe someone can indicate if something
looks wrong?
=======
# cat /proc/slabinfo
# name <active_objs> <num_objs> <objsize> <objperslab> <pagesperslab>
nfsd4_delegations 0...
2011 Nov 10
13
dom0 - oom-killer - memory leak somewhere ?
...ch log as i thought could be helpful in attachments.
Host bk - about to get a reboot, as xend already got killed
Host sw - 800MB/2GB used for nothing,
Attachments contains :
- memory graph (by munin) - it might help to see the pattern of memory usage
cat from :
- grub.cfg
- /proc/meminfo
- /proc/slabinfo
- /proc/vmstat
- /var/log/kern.log
- /var/log/xen/xend.log
Result from :
- dmesg
- dpkg -l
- free
- lsmod
- top
- vmstat
- xm info
- xm info -c
I''d appreciate any feedback about such behaviour, and would be happy to
provide additional information.
Those are productions servers, the onl...
2010 Apr 19
20
Lustre Client - Memory Issue
Hi Guys,
My users are reporting some issues with memory on our lustre 1.8.1 clients.
It looks like when they submit a single job at a time the run time was about
4.5 minutes. However, when they ran multiple jobs (10 or less) on a client
with 192GB of memory on a single node the run time for each job was
exceeding 3-4X the run time for the single process. They also noticed that
the swap space
2012 Nov 15
3
Likely mem leak in 3.7
...s into
its own directory under /sys/fs/cgroup/openrc. But top(1) shows all
of the processes, and its idea of free mem does change with pg''s use
of its shared segment. So it doesn''t *look* like the ram is hiding
in some cgroup.
The kernel does not log anything relevant to this.
Slabinfo gives some odd output. It seems to think there are negative
quantities of some slabs:
Name Objects Objsize Space Slabs/Part/Cpu O/S O %Fr %Ef Flg
:at-0000016 5632 16 90.1K 18446744073709551363/0/275 256 0 0 100 *a
:t-0000048 3386...
2018 Jul 27
0
Finding memory usage
On 07/27/2018 08:10 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> The problem is that I can't find 2.4G of usage.
Are your results from "top" similar to:
? ps axu | sort -nr -k +6
If you don't see 2.4G of use from applications, maybe the kernel is
using a lot of memory.? Check /proc/slabinfo.? You can simplify its
content to bytes per object type and a total:
? grep -v ^# /proc/slabinfo | awk 'BEGIN {t=0;} {print $1 " " ($3 *
$4); t=t+($3 * $4)} END {print "total " t/(1024 * 1024) " MB";}' | column -t
2018 Jul 27
1
Finding memory usage
...The problem is that I can't find 2.4G of usage.
>
>
> Are your results from "top" similar to:
>
> ? ps axu | sort -nr -k +6
That looks the same.
>
> If you don't see 2.4G of use from applications, maybe the kernel is
> using a lot of memory.? Check /proc/slabinfo.? You can simplify its
> content to bytes per object type and a total:
>
> ? grep -v ^# /proc/slabinfo | awk 'BEGIN {t=0;} {print $1 " " ($3 *
> $4); t=t+($3 * $4)} END {print "total " t/(1024 * 1024) " MB";}' |
> column -t
The total number from...
2004 Jan 30
1
rsync 2.5.6, No buffer space available error...
...er_head, trying again.
>>
>> anyone seen this?
>
> Not an rsync problem. This is a kernel issue.
>
> You seem to be out of ZONE_DMA memory. I don't know whether
> you should be reporting this to RH or Veritas or IBM but
> when you do be sure to send them /proc/slabinfo from the
> moment of error.
>
> One thing you might try is booting with mem=900M Running
> with more than 900M < n < 1G memory on 2.4 kernels is
> problematic.
>
>
I am experiencing this same problem with rsync 2.5.6 and 2.5.7. The
difference for me is I am running...
2009 Apr 09
1
[Bridge] Out of memory problem
Hi, I'm using linux 2.6.21.5 and our kernel is freeze.
The problem is, if I create a Software bridge using $brctl command. and
add two interfaces say, eth0.0 and eth0.1 using
$brctl addbr br-lan
$brctl addif br-lan eth0.0
$brctl addif br-lan eth0.1
and when i send traffic from a host connected to one port to host
connected at other end, soon all the memory is dried up and and kernel
2004 Aug 24
14
Shorewall response time slowing
Ok here are all the information the website said I should include first:
[root@residents root]# shorewall version
1.4.8
[root@residents root]# ip addr show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
2011 Sep 01
1
No buffer space available - loses network connectivity
...e
ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available
ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available
=========================================
All my investigation so far led me to believe that it is because
skbuff cache getting full.
=========================================================================
PROC-SLABINFO
skbuff_fclone_cache 227 308 512 7 1 : tunables 54
27 8 : slabdata 44 44 0
skbuff_head_cache 1574 1650 256 15 1 : tunables 120 60
8 : slabdata 110 110 0
SLAB-TOP
Active / Total Objects (% used) : 2140910 / 2200115 (97.3%)
Active / To...
2007 Mar 10
0
Questions about pass through block devices
...to me that perhaps we''re crashing less often
because the block request delivery times have improved dramatically,
and the queues are likely growing shorter.
The only direct evidence that I and one other list member have seen
that could be related to this issue is that accessing /dev/slabinfo
on a regular basis in the Dom0 appears to greatly increase the
frequency of crashes, which leads me to believe that the issue, at
its core, is somehow related to SLAB corruption in Dom0.
Another list member has also recently reported that this issue
appears to be fixed in the unstable line...
2006 Apr 09
0
Slab memory usage on dom0 increases by 128MB/day
...6008 kB
SwapFree: 506008 kB
Dirty: 88 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
Mapped: 22724 kB
Slab: 83672 kB
CommitLimit: 622232 kB
Committed_AS: 43236 kB
PageTables: 468 kB
VmallocTotal: 696312 kB
VmallocUsed: 856 kB
VmallocChunk: 695416 kB
/dev/slabinfo
slabinfo - version: 2.1
# name <active_objs> <num_objs> <objsize> <objperslab>
<pagesperslab> : tunables <limit> <batchcount> <sharedfactor> : slabdata
<active>
rpc_buffers 8 8 2048 2 1 : tunables 24 12...
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Re: 2.6.0-test9 : bridge freezes
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 20:57:44 +0530 (GMT+05:30)
anand@eis.iisc.ernet.in (SVR Anand) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am one of the system administrators who manage a campus network of 5000 users
> that is connected to Internet. We have placed a Linux bridge to isolate the
> Internet from the campus. To nullify network flooding effect, we have used
> iptables. The kernel is 2.6.0-test9, the
2004 Nov 27
1
Performance problems on Intel E100 (Shawn Wright)
>From: "Shawn Wright" <swright@sls.bc.ca>
>Subject: [Shorewall-users] Finally making some progress
>I *think* we are finally making some progress in tracking our elusive
>performance problems. After employing a second 10Mb link from our ISP,
>along with another firewall box and proxy, we were able to determine the
>problem *is* our firewall. We don''t