Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "skipnoreturndef".
2016 Jun 26
2
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation
...for bug fix 28144 is updated after finding more
refinement in remarks calculation. As per suggestion from Matthias Braun
and Hal Finkel regmask calculation code is same as
MachineRegisterInfo::isPhysRegModified() except no check of isNoReturnDef()
is required. So we proposed to add a bool argument SkipNoReturnDef with
default value false to isPhysRegModified method so that with out breaking
current use of isPhysRegModified we can reuse that code for the purpose of
IPRA. The patch can be found here : http://reviews.llvm.org/D21395
With IPRA to improve code quality, call site with local functions are
forced...
2016 Jun 21
0
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 20, 2016, at 12:53 PM, Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Vivek,
> >
> > vivek pandya via llvm-dev wrote:
> > > int foo() {
> > > return 12;
> > > }
> > >
> > >
2016 Jun 20
2
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation
> On Jun 20, 2016, at 12:53 PM, Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Vivek,
>
> vivek pandya via llvm-dev wrote:
> > int foo() {
> > return 12;
> > }
> >
> > int bar(int a) {
> > return foo() + a;
> > }
> >
> > int (*fp)() = 0;
> > int (*fp1)(int) = 0;
2016 Jul 10
2
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation
...finding more
>> refinement in remarks calculation. As per suggestion from Matthias Braun
>> and Hal Finkel regmask calculation code is same as
>> MachineRegisterInfo::isPhysRegModified() except no check of isNoReturnDef()
>> is required. So we proposed to add a bool argument SkipNoReturnDef with
>> default value false to isPhysRegModified method so that with out breaking
>> current use of isPhysRegModified we can reuse that code for the purpose of
>> IPRA. The patch can be found here : http://reviews.llvm.org/D21395
>>
>> With IPRA to improve code quality...
2016 Jul 25
2
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation
...finement in remarks calculation. As per suggestion from Matthias Braun
>>>> and Hal Finkel regmask calculation code is same as
>>>> MachineRegisterInfo::isPhysRegModified() except no check of isNoReturnDef()
>>>> is required. So we proposed to add a bool argument SkipNoReturnDef with
>>>> default value false to isPhysRegModified method so that with out breaking
>>>> current use of isPhysRegModified we can reuse that code for the purpose of
>>>> IPRA. The patch can be found here : http://reviews.llvm.org/D21395
>>>>
>>&g...