search for: skimmers

...ioned there that ought to also be mentioned in the >>body of the bytecode document. I admit I'm lazy, so I usually only read >>upgrade sections of a doc when I'm busy upgrading to the next >>version. Here's a vote for making the docs more friendly to lazy >>skimmers like myself. > >Could you provide a list of the "several things mentioned there that ought >to be mentioned in the body of the bytecode document"? I'm unclear on the >specifics you're referring to. I'm happy to make this "skimmer friendly" >but just...

...at there are several things mentioned there that ought to also be mentioned in the body of the bytecode document. I admit I'm lazy, so I usually only read upgrade sections of a doc when I'm busy upgrading to the next version. Here's a vote for making the docs more friendly to lazy skimmers like myself. More comments below: At 08:56 PM 8/16/2004, you wrote: >From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> >Precedence: list >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Bytecode file bugs / doc bugs >Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:56:22 -0700 >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc...

...things mentioned there that ought to also be mentioned in > the body of the bytecode document. I admit I'm lazy, so I usually only > read upgrade sections of a doc when I'm busy upgrading to the next > version. Here's a vote for making the docs more friendly to lazy > skimmers like myself. Could you provide a list of the "several things mentioned there that ought to be mentioned in the body of the bytecode document"? I'm unclear on the specifics you're referring to. I'm happy to make this "skimmer friendly" but just not sure what you...