search for: skcc

One is an integer and the other is not. Try for (i in 1:5) print( identical( i, as.integer(1) ) ) --- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:47:07 -0800 From: John Welsh <jwelsh at skcc.org> To: 'R-help at lists.R-project.org' <R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch> Subject: [R] Basic question on function "identical" > for(i in c(1:5)) + { + print(identical(i,1)) + } [1] FALSE [1] FALSE [1] FALSE [1] FALSE [1] FALSE Why don't I get: [1] TRUE [1]...

...gured: nfs.rpc-auth-allow: 150.2.223.249 nfs.rpc-auth-unix: on Cloud Computing Business Team Andrew Kong Assistant Manager | andrew.kong at sk.com| T:+82-2-6400-4328 | M:+82-10-8776-5025 SK u-Tower, 25-1, Jeongja-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 463-844, Korea SK C&C<http://www.skcc.co.kr/> : About<http://www.skcc.co.kr/user/common/userContentViewer.vw?menuID=KRCA03000000> >>

...r(i in c(1:5)) + { + print(identical(i,1)) + } [1] FALSE [1] FALSE [1] FALSE [1] FALSE [1] FALSE Why don't I get: [1] TRUE [1] FALSE [1] FALSE [1] FALSE [1] FALSE John Welsh Associate Professor Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center 10835 Altman Row San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 450-5990 ex.282 jwelsh at skcc.org

Hi- I'm new to Gluster, but am trying to get it set up on a new compute cluster we're building. We picked Gluster for one of our cluster file systems (we're also using Lustre for fast scratch space), but the Gluster performance has been so bad that I think maybe we have a configuration problem -- perhaps we're missing a tuning parameter that would help, but I can't find

Hi, all, i try to check the performance of Map/Reduce of Gluster File system. Mapper side speed is quite good and it is sometimes faster than hadoop's map job. But in the Reduce Side job is much slower than hadoop. i analyze the result and i found the primary reason of slow speed is bad performance in Merging stage. Would you have any suggestion for this issue FYI check the blog