search for: skb_array_resize

...lude/linux/skb_array.h @@ -151,16 +151,24 @@ static inline int skb_array_init(struct skb_array *a, int size, gfp_t gfp) return ptr_ring_init(&a->ring, size, 0, gfp); } -void __skb_array_destroy_skb(void *ptr) +static void __skb_array_destroy_skb(void *ptr) { kfree_skb(ptr); } -int skb_array_resize(struct skb_array *a, int size, gfp_t gfp) +static inline int skb_array_resize(struct skb_array *a, int size, gfp_t gfp) { return ptr_ring_resize(&a->ring, size, gfp, __skb_array_destroy_skb); } +static inline int skb_raay_resize_multiple(struct skb_array **rings, int nrings, + i...

...lude/linux/skb_array.h @@ -151,16 +151,24 @@ static inline int skb_array_init(struct skb_array *a, int size, gfp_t gfp) return ptr_ring_init(&a->ring, size, 0, gfp); } -void __skb_array_destroy_skb(void *ptr) +static void __skb_array_destroy_skb(void *ptr) { kfree_skb(ptr); } -int skb_array_resize(struct skb_array *a, int size, gfp_t gfp) +static inline int skb_array_resize(struct skb_array *a, int size, gfp_t gfp) { return ptr_ring_resize(&a->ring, size, gfp, __skb_array_destroy_skb); } +static inline int skb_raay_resize_multiple(struct skb_array **rings, int nrings, + i...

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:41:20AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Would it help to have ptr_ring_resize that gets an array of > rings and resizes them both to same length? OK, here it is. Untested so far, and no skb wrapper. Pls let me know whether this is what you had in mind. --> ptr_ring: support resizing multiple queues Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:41:20AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Would it help to have ptr_ring_resize that gets an array of > rings and resizes them both to same length? OK, here it is. Untested so far, and no skb wrapper. Pls let me know whether this is what you had in mind. --> ptr_ring: support resizing multiple queues Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at

Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the

Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the

Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the

Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the