search for: ska124

...d approach matches up instrumentation based method in detecting hot paths. Independent of the method used in generating path profile data, your proposed work on the path profile info representation and query APIs can be shared. thanks, David On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Snehasish Kumar <ska124 at sfu.ca> wrote: > Hi > > I am pinging to find out if there is any interest to mentor this > proposal for GSoC this year? I've submitted a draft via the GSoC > website. > > David, Vedant it would be great if I could get some advice on refining > the goals and partic...

...etails if there is interest. > > Independent of the method used in generating path profile data, your > proposed work on the path profile info representation and query APIs can be > shared. > > thanks, > > David > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Snehasish Kumar <ska124 at sfu.ca> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> I am pinging to find out if there is any interest to mentor this >> proposal for GSoC this year? I've submitted a draft via the GSoC >> website. >> >> David, Vedant it would be great if I could get some advice o...

...code that uses DependenceAnalysis. Which is > appropriate; it's not ready for use (that is, it's incorrect). I > misunderstood how GEPs work, so it will sometimes miss existing dependences. > > Preston > > > > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Snehasish Kumar <ska124 at sfu.ca> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I want to analyse the memory dependencies which exist in a loop at an >> intra iteration as well as inter iteration (loop carried dependencies). I >> looked at the DependenceAnalysis implementation which returns a lot of the >&g...

Hi I want to analyse the memory dependencies which exist in a loop at an intra iteration as well as inter iteration (loop carried dependencies). I looked at the DependenceAnalysis implementation which returns a lot of the information I require (based on a prior AliasAnalysis pass), however I need to pass the Src and Dst instructions in program order. I was wondering how I can collect all the

...sion we use internally is not performance oriented and will require refactoring. Here is a link to the draft document [1]. Thanks, Snehasish [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/18i9FvD7FSqX6tNEXb83gzc0EC_STeS3bWOVf167sFWk/edit?usp=sharing On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Snehasish Kumar <ska124 at sfu.ca> wrote: > Hi David, > >> Are the data below all collected when only one function is picked for >> instrumentation? > > Yes, here is a list of the benchmarks and selected functions. > > +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------...

Hi David, > Are the data below all collected when only one function is picked for > instrumentation? Yes, here is a list of the benchmarks and selected functions. +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | blks | _Z19BlkSchlsEqEuroNoDivfffffif |

Hi I was wondering if someone knows about any effort within the LLVM community to perform stack usage analysis per function similar to GCC's "-fstack-usage<http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gnat_ugn_unw/Static-Stack-Usage-Analysis.html>" option? In short, with fstack-usage, gcc prints out the maximum stack usage per function (in bytes) which it can determine as a) static (no