Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "sk_mark_napi_id".
Did you mean:
skb_mark_napi_id
2015 Dec 02
2
[PATCH net-next 3/3] vhost_net: basic polling support
...;> Yes, it is. I have some patches to do this by replacing
>> skb_queue_empty() with sk_busy_loop() but for tap.
> We probably don't want to do this unconditionally, though.
>
>> Tests does not show
>> any improvement but some regression.
> Did you add code to call sk_mark_napi_id on tap then?
> sk_busy_loop won't do anything useful without.
Yes I did. Probably something wrong elsewhere.
>
>> Maybe it's better to test macvtap.
> Same thing ...
>
2015 Dec 02
2
[PATCH net-next 3/3] vhost_net: basic polling support
...;> Yes, it is. I have some patches to do this by replacing
>> skb_queue_empty() with sk_busy_loop() but for tap.
> We probably don't want to do this unconditionally, though.
>
>> Tests does not show
>> any improvement but some regression.
> Did you add code to call sk_mark_napi_id on tap then?
> sk_busy_loop won't do anything useful without.
Yes I did. Probably something wrong elsewhere.
>
>> Maybe it's better to test macvtap.
> Same thing ...
>
2015 Dec 01
2
[PATCH net-next 3/3] vhost_net: basic polling support
On 11/30/2015 06:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:11:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> > This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive
>> > queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The maximum time
>> > spent on polling were specified through a new kind of vring ioctl.
>> >
>> >
2015 Dec 01
2
[PATCH net-next 3/3] vhost_net: basic polling support
On 11/30/2015 06:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:11:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> > This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive
>> > queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The maximum time
>> > spent on polling were specified through a new kind of vring ioctl.
>> >
>> >
2015 Dec 01
0
[PATCH net-next 3/3] vhost_net: basic polling support
...gt; >
> >
>
> Yes, it is. I have some patches to do this by replacing
> skb_queue_empty() with sk_busy_loop() but for tap.
We probably don't want to do this unconditionally, though.
> Tests does not show
> any improvement but some regression.
Did you add code to call sk_mark_napi_id on tap then?
sk_busy_loop won't do anything useful without.
> Maybe it's better to test macvtap.
Same thing ...
--
MST
2015 Dec 02
0
[PATCH net-next 3/3] vhost_net: basic polling support
...patches to do this by replacing
> >> skb_queue_empty() with sk_busy_loop() but for tap.
> > We probably don't want to do this unconditionally, though.
> >
> >> Tests does not show
> >> any improvement but some regression.
> > Did you add code to call sk_mark_napi_id on tap then?
> > sk_busy_loop won't do anything useful without.
>
> Yes I did. Probably something wrong elsewhere.
Is this for guest-to-guest? the patch to do napi
for tap is still not upstream due to minor performance
regression. Want me to repost it?
> >
> >> M...