search for: sk_alloc

Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "sk_alloc".

Did you mean: s_alloc
2010 Jan 27
9
[Bridge] [PATCH 0/3 v3] macvtap driver
This is the third version of the macvtap device driver, following another major restructuring and a lot of bug fixes: * Change macvtap to be based around a struct sock * macvtap: fix initialization * return 0 to netlink * don't use rcu for q->file and q->vlan pointers * macvtap: checkpatch.pl fixes * macvtap: fix tun IFF flags * Use a struct socket to make tx flow control work * disable
2010 Jan 27
9
[Bridge] [PATCH 0/3 v3] macvtap driver
This is the third version of the macvtap device driver, following another major restructuring and a lot of bug fixes: * Change macvtap to be based around a struct sock * macvtap: fix initialization * return 0 to netlink * don't use rcu for q->file and q->vlan pointers * macvtap: checkpatch.pl fixes * macvtap: fix tun IFF flags * Use a struct socket to make tx flow control work * disable
2010 Jan 27
9
[Bridge] [PATCH 0/3 v3] macvtap driver
This is the third version of the macvtap device driver, following another major restructuring and a lot of bug fixes: * Change macvtap to be based around a struct sock * macvtap: fix initialization * return 0 to netlink * don't use rcu for q->file and q->vlan pointers * macvtap: checkpatch.pl fixes * macvtap: fix tun IFF flags * Use a struct socket to make tx flow control work * disable
2009 Dec 03
3
[RFC 0/2] macvtap, second try
I did not get this ready for the merge window, but people asked what the status of this is so I'm posting it now to solicit feedback. The first patch just adds some hooks into macvlan.c and is less invasive than the previous version. That part should be fine and I'd like this to get merged into macvlan for 2.6.33 if people agree that the approach is right. The second patch adds the
2009 Dec 03
3
[RFC 0/2] macvtap, second try
I did not get this ready for the merge window, but people asked what the status of this is so I'm posting it now to solicit feedback. The first patch just adds some hooks into macvlan.c and is less invasive than the previous version. That part should be fine and I'd like this to get merged into macvlan for 2.6.33 if people agree that the approach is right. The second patch adds the
2009 Dec 03
3
[RFC 0/2] macvtap, second try
I did not get this ready for the merge window, but people asked what the status of this is so I'm posting it now to solicit feedback. The first patch just adds some hooks into macvlan.c and is less invasive than the previous version. That part should be fine and I'd like this to get merged into macvlan for 2.6.33 if people agree that the approach is right. The second patch adds the
2008 Dec 14
5
[PATCH] AF_VMCHANNEL address family for guest<->host communication.
...); + return ret; +} + +static void vmchannel_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk) +{ + skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue); + skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_write_queue); +} + +static struct sock *vmchannel_sock_alloc(struct socket *sock, int proto, + gfp_t prio) +{ + struct sock *sk; + + sk = sk_alloc(&init_net, PF_VMCHANNEL, prio, &vmchannel_proto); + + if (!sk) + return NULL; + + sock_init_data(sock, sk); + skb_queue_head_init(&vmchannel_sk(sk)->backlog_skb_q); + sk->sk_destruct = vmchannel_sock_destruct; + sk->sk_protocol = proto; + + vmchannel_sock_link(&vmchannel_s...
2008 Dec 14
5
[PATCH] AF_VMCHANNEL address family for guest<->host communication.
...); + return ret; +} + +static void vmchannel_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk) +{ + skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue); + skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_write_queue); +} + +static struct sock *vmchannel_sock_alloc(struct socket *sock, int proto, + gfp_t prio) +{ + struct sock *sk; + + sk = sk_alloc(&init_net, PF_VMCHANNEL, prio, &vmchannel_proto); + + if (!sk) + return NULL; + + sock_init_data(sock, sk); + skb_queue_head_init(&vmchannel_sk(sk)->backlog_skb_q); + sk->sk_destruct = vmchannel_sock_destruct; + sk->sk_protocol = proto; + + vmchannel_sock_link(&vmchannel_s...
2011 Aug 12
11
[net-next RFC PATCH 0/7] multiqueue support for tun/tap
As multi-queue nics were commonly used for high-end servers, current single queue based tap can not satisfy the requirement of scaling guest network performance as the numbers of vcpus increase. So the following series implements multiple queue support in tun/tap. In order to take advantages of this, a multi-queue capable driver and qemu were also needed. I just rebase the latest version of
2011 Aug 12
11
[net-next RFC PATCH 0/7] multiqueue support for tun/tap
As multi-queue nics were commonly used for high-end servers, current single queue based tap can not satisfy the requirement of scaling guest network performance as the numbers of vcpus increase. So the following series implements multiple queue support in tun/tap. In order to take advantages of this, a multi-queue capable driver and qemu were also needed. I just rebase the latest version of
2012 Oct 16
11
[PATCH 0/6] VSOCK for Linux upstreaming
* * * In an effort to improve the out-of-the-box experience with Linux kernels for VMware users, VMware is working on readying the Virtual Machine Communication Interface (vmw_vmci) and VMCI Sockets (VSOCK) (vmw_vsock) kernel modules for inclusion in the Linux kernel. The purpose of this post is to acquire feedback on the vmw_vsock kernel module. The vmw_vmci kernel module has been presented in
2012 Oct 16
11
[PATCH 0/6] VSOCK for Linux upstreaming
* * * In an effort to improve the out-of-the-box experience with Linux kernels for VMware users, VMware is working on readying the Virtual Machine Communication Interface (vmw_vmci) and VMCI Sockets (VSOCK) (vmw_vsock) kernel modules for inclusion in the Linux kernel. The purpose of this post is to acquire feedback on the vmw_vsock kernel module. The vmw_vmci kernel module has been presented in
2013 Jan 25
4
[PATCH 0/1] VM Sockets for Linux upstreaming
From: Andy King <acking at vmware.com> ** Introduce VM Sockets *** In an effort to improve the out-of-the-box experience with Linux kernels for VMware users, VMware is working on readying the VM Sockets (VSOCK, formerly VMCI Sockets) (vmw_vsock) kernel module for inclusion in the Linux kernel. The purpose of this post is to acquire feedback on the vmw_vsock kernel module. Unlike previous
2013 Jan 25
4
[PATCH 0/1] VM Sockets for Linux upstreaming
From: Andy King <acking at vmware.com> ** Introduce VM Sockets *** In an effort to improve the out-of-the-box experience with Linux kernels for VMware users, VMware is working on readying the VM Sockets (VSOCK, formerly VMCI Sockets) (vmw_vsock) kernel module for inclusion in the Linux kernel. The purpose of this post is to acquire feedback on the vmw_vsock kernel module. Unlike previous
2013 Jan 08
7
[PATCH 0/6] VSOCK for Linux upstreaming
* * * This series of VSOCK linux upstreaming patches include latest udpate from VMware to address Greg's and all other's code review comments. Summary of changes: - Rebase our linux kernel tree from v3.5 to v3.7. - Fix all checkpatch warnings and errors. Fix some checkpatch with -strict errors. This addresses Greg's comment: On 15 Nov 2012
2013 Jan 08
7
[PATCH 0/6] VSOCK for Linux upstreaming
* * * This series of VSOCK linux upstreaming patches include latest udpate from VMware to address Greg's and all other's code review comments. Summary of changes: - Rebase our linux kernel tree from v3.5 to v3.7. - Fix all checkpatch warnings and errors. Fix some checkpatch with -strict errors. This addresses Greg's comment: On 15 Nov 2012
2012 Nov 21
6
[PATCH 0/6] VSOCK for Linux upstreaming
* * * This series of VSOCK linux upstreaming patches include latest udpate from VMware. Summary of changes: - Sparse clean. - Checkpatch clean with one exception, a "complex macro" in which we can't add parentheses. - Remove all runtime assertions. - Fix device name, so that existing user clients work. - Fix VMCI handle lookup. * *
2012 Nov 21
6
[PATCH 0/6] VSOCK for Linux upstreaming
* * * This series of VSOCK linux upstreaming patches include latest udpate from VMware. Summary of changes: - Sparse clean. - Checkpatch clean with one exception, a "complex macro" in which we can't add parentheses. - Remove all runtime assertions. - Fix device name, so that existing user clients work. - Fix VMCI handle lookup. * *