search for: sizeof_ptregs

...nel/head_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S index 4bbc770af632..5a3cde971cb7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S @@ -72,6 +72,20 @@ SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(startup_64) /* Set up the stack for verify_cpu(), similar to initial_stack below */ leaq (__end_init_task - SIZEOF_PTREGS)(%rip), %rsp + /* Setup boot GDT descriptor and load boot GDT */ + leaq boot_gdt(%rip), %rax + movq %rax, boot_gdt_base(%rip) + lgdt boot_gdt_descr(%rip) + + /* GDT loaded - switch to __KERNEL_CS so IRET works reliably */ + pushq $__KERNEL_CS + leaq .Lon_kernel_cs(%rip), %rax + pushq %rax + lretq...

...; index 4bbc770af632..5a3cde971cb7 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S > @@ -72,6 +72,20 @@ SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(startup_64) > /* Set up the stack for verify_cpu(), similar to initial_stack below */ > leaq (__end_init_task - SIZEOF_PTREGS)(%rip), %rsp > > + /* Setup boot GDT descriptor and load boot GDT */ > + leaq boot_gdt(%rip), %rax > + movq %rax, boot_gdt_base(%rip) > + lgdt boot_gdt_descr(%rip) > + > + /* GDT loaded - switch to __KERNEL_CS so IRET works reliably */ &gt...

...nel/head_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S index 4bbc770af632..11a28c1fb51f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S @@ -72,6 +72,26 @@ SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(startup_64) /* Set up the stack for verify_cpu(), similar to initial_stack below */ leaq (__end_init_task - SIZEOF_PTREGS)(%rip), %rsp + /* Setup boot GDT descriptor and load boot GDT */ + leaq boot_gdt(%rip), %rax + movq %rax, boot_gdt_base(%rip) + lgdt boot_gdt_descr(%rip) + + /* New GDT is live - reload data segment registers */ + movl $__KERNEL_DS, %eax + movl %eax, %ds + movl %eax, %ss + movl %eax, %es + + /* N...

...nel/head_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S index 4bbc770af632..62513dd1e0e4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S @@ -72,6 +72,26 @@ SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(startup_64) /* Set up the stack for verify_cpu(), similar to initial_stack below */ leaq (__end_init_task - SIZEOF_PTREGS)(%rip), %rsp + /* Setup boot GDT descriptor and load boot GDT */ + leaq boot_gdt(%rip), %rax + movq %rax, boot_gdt_descr+2(%rip) + lgdt boot_gdt_descr(%rip) + + /* New GDT is live - reload data segment registers */ + movl $__KERNEL_DS, %eax + movl %eax, %ds + movl %eax, %ss + movl %eax, %es + + /...

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:16:41PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > @@ -480,6 +500,22 @@ SYM_DATA_LOCAL(early_gdt_descr_base, .quad INIT_PER_CPU_VAR(gdt_page)) > SYM_DATA(phys_base, .quad 0x0) > EXPORT_SYMBOL(phys_base) > > +/* Boot GDT used when kernel addresses are not mapped yet */ > +SYM_DATA_LOCAL(boot_gdt_descr, .word boot_gdt_end - boot_gdt) >

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:16:41PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > @@ -480,6 +500,22 @@ SYM_DATA_LOCAL(early_gdt_descr_base, .quad INIT_PER_CPU_VAR(gdt_page)) > SYM_DATA(phys_base, .quad 0x0) > EXPORT_SYMBOL(phys_base) > > +/* Boot GDT used when kernel addresses are not mapped yet */ > +SYM_DATA_LOCAL(boot_gdt_descr, .word boot_gdt_end - boot_gdt) >

...ese variables */ @@ -286,6 +317,9 @@ SYM_CODE_END(start_cpu0) .balign 8 SYM_DATA(initial_code, .quad x86_64_start_kernel) SYM_DATA(initial_gs, .quad INIT_PER_CPU_VAR(fixed_percpu_data)) +#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT +SYM_DATA(initial_vc_handler, .quad handle_vc_boot_ghcb) +#endif /* * The SIZEOF_PTREGS gap is a convention which helps the in-kernel unwinder diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es-shared.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es-shared.c index 18619279a46f..aa77f2eb8d88 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es-shared.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es-shared.c @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ * and is included directly into...

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a new version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches for x86. The previous versions can be found as a linked list starting here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824085511.7553-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ I updated the patch-set based on ther review comments I got and the discussions around it. Another important change is that the early IDT

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a new version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches for x86. The previous versions can be found as a linked list starting here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824085511.7553-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ I updated the patch-set based on ther review comments I got and the discussions around it. Another important change is that the early IDT

Hi, here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete, but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.

Hi, here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete, but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.

Changes: - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce

Changes: - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce

These patches make the changes necessary to build the kernel as Position Independent Executable (PIE) on x86_64. A PIE kernel can be relocated below the top 2G of the virtual address space. It allows to optionally extend the KASLR randomization range from 1G to 3G. Thanks a lot to Ard Biesheuvel & Kees Cook on their feedback on compiler changes, PIE support and KASLR in general. Thanks to

These patches make the changes necessary to build the kernel as Position Independent Executable (PIE) on x86_64. A PIE kernel can be relocated below the top 2G of the virtual address space. It allows to optionally extend the KASLR randomization range from 1G to 3G. Thanks a lot to Ard Biesheuvel & Kees Cook on their feedback on compiler changes, PIE support and KASLR in general. Thanks to

Changes: - patch v3: - Update on message to describe longer term PIE goal. - Minor change on ftrace if condition. - Changed code using xchgq. - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace

Changes: - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce dynamic relocation space on mapped memory. It also simplifies the relocation process. - Move the start the module section next to the kernel. Remove the need for -mcmodel=large on modules. Extends

Changes: - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce dynamic relocation space on mapped memory. It also simplifies the relocation process. - Move the start the module section next to the kernel. Remove the need for -mcmodel=large on modules. Extends

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a rebased version of the latest SEV-ES patches. They are now based on latest tip/master instead of upstream Linux and include the necessary changes. Changes to v4 are in particular: - Moved early IDT setup code to idt.c, because the idt_descr and the idt_table are now static - This required to make stack protector work early (or

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and rebased the code v5.8-rc5. The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the #VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big pile of entry code changes merged into