search for: situt

hi, i have a strange situtation. i try to connect to my machine with ssh and the packets are dropped but i have at the top of my rules an accept. the configuration looks like: rules-file: ----------- ACCEPT net fw tcp 22 - TCPDUMP-log: ------------ 12:16:08.153934 84.153.98.30.1322 > [my-destination-...

...r answering all of my emails to the mailing list with the many questions that I have had. Your answers have been a great help. Just a few more questions, ok. I have been reading over the documentation and need to find out how Tinc behaves regarding the VPN and hosts as I will have to distinct situtations to address in our system. 1. Which is a web server for example that will service both the VPN connections and also standard Internet connections. 2. Servers that will only service VPN connections. What I mean is this. In a few other solutions that I have been investigating, you can handle...

Hi all! I have a situtation that I want to get happening: We have just installed a colour photocopier with duplexing at a client's office. We're looking to have four printers pointing at this one device, with the following settings (one for each printer): * Black and White * Black and White, Duplexed * Col...

i''ve got a situtation where i''m trying to pass arguments from a method to find and AR is telling me that it can''t find the record where id=all here''s what i am attempting to do class Thing < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :x end class FlyingThing < Thing end class x < Active...

...ic on the server. It will be used possibly as a file server, it will most definitely be used also as a mail server and webserver. i would be ok to me to not mirror the drives but this is for my place of employment and im looking to implement a linux server. im not new to linux, just the whole raid situtation. i would like to show my employer how well linux runs in a business environment. Thanks

...share a name with, for example, one of the Windows commands. What should I do when I'd really like (the equivalent of) a call passed to system() that would be executed using the same Path that you'd get if working directly at the Windows command line? Is there a recommended workaround for situtations like this? (It _seems_ like it would be handy if system() et al. included an additional argument that optionally disabled the prepending of those extra directories, to give Windows users full control of the path seen by system(). Would adding such an argument have undesirable ramifications?)...

...installation on a Compaq Proliant 6500 with dual pentium 266Mhz processors, approx. 630MB ram and a hardware SMART-2DH RAID controller and array. All file systems are ext3. The server has been in service for a couple of years now. From time to time we will lose power in our office or have another situtation that causes the server to lose power without a proper shutdown. We had such a situation today. Usually the server reboots to runlevel 5 without a problem. However, today the server rebooted to the point in the boot process just after mounting the root filesystem. It then stalls indefinitely...

...ry() but I am not quite sure if that is what I am looking for. I essentially look for a command that, in plain English, allows me to specify that if the integral goes to infinity, skip these parameters, and simply continue optimizing into another direction. Is this possible? How do you guys handle situtations like this? Regards Tobias -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problems-with-Optimization-tf2863893.html#a8003228 Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...dn't "./net groupmap list" show these groups with LDAP as well? Do we have to create these groups manually? How? Logs from the LDAP server show that Samba is desperately looking for a group with gid=-1. Manually creating a Samba groups in the LDAP directory does *not* improve the situtation. Can anyone help, please? Best regards, Alex Meier

Ok, a refinement of the question I asked yesterday (If there were any replies from yesterday I don''t have access to them here .. sorry if I''m duplicating anybody''s words here). How can one host multiple domains with mongrel? Assuming you are mass vhosting and you also want the performance benefits of using mongrel ... As far as I can tell, one could set up a

...quot; or something. > I believe that if you explicitly use mmx intrinsics you have to insert > emms yourself, and that the only other way to get mmx badness is > through use of the gcc generic vector extension. If this is true, I > think we should be ok. I think that is true, but, the situtation with llvm is rather worse than with gcc: llvm uses MMX registers for mem-to-mem copies of 64- bit vectors, while gcc does not. gcc attempts to restrict its use of MMX to the MMX builtins, and the loads and stores connected to them; we think it is possible for RA spilling to use MMX re...

...here are the various source tarballs (tar.gz format, tar.bz2 format). Also a directory called RPMS/. But that kernel.org RPMS/ directory is devoid of any content. Secondly, I realize mixing binaries/executables during a given boot session would be a problem. but I don't think that's the situtation here, not even getting to apscp TFTP request of ldlinux.e64. However, your answer got me further along. It's not clearly spelled out, but the PXE NBP (network bootstrap program -- i.e., what's in your dhcpd.conf file) for efi32 should be efi32/core/syslinux.efi and for efi64, it sho...

...boxes checked. I've poked around Microsoft Technet, and I haven't been able to figure out what "code 131" means. In searching the mailing lists, it looks as if other folks have run into similar problems, but I haven't seen any solutions that look as if they would apply to my situtation. To ward off some of the questions I've seen in response to this sort of problem report: > Did you create a machine account on the PDC for the Samba box? Yes. > Did you set the > workgroup = <DOMAINNAME> > security = domain > password serve...

...r > move) the function pointer to (right before the callee saved register > restore) but thinking a little further that's nonsense. Why don't define some special op for callee address and custom lower it? I really suggest you to look into eh_return. It's used in some pretty tricky situtation inside eh runtime: it it used to return from some eh runtime code. We already know, how much we should unwind the stack, and what is the handler (sounds similar, right?). Also %eax and %edx are used to return eh data and should be preserved in such function. So, in general, code for eh_return...

> This is a matter of presentation, but some of the "GCC extensions" are > standard C99 (now, at least). I noticed long long, C++-style comments > and designated initializers. > > I have plenty of complaints about the GCC documentation you're > pointing at, but this probably isn't the right forum for that. I do > think dropping "as fast as

...n), callee cleans the stack (stdcall calling convention). The call is not suitable for tail call, if b and c cleans the stack differently. For example, let b has C CC and c - stdcall CC. In this case making tail call results to double cleaning (on in a and one in c), which is incorrect. 2. The same situtation is for struct return functions: the caller pushes extra pointer to return value, but callee is required to clean this pointer out of the stack. So, call b->c is "suitable for tail call" iff both b and c are struct return. 3. Various tricky cases with FP. I don't remeber correc...

...L0000000000000003 [24r,24d:1)[104r,104d:2) which fails the verifier with "Multiple connected components in live interval". I'm able to hack this segment out in simple situations when the identity copy is removed, but so far have been unable to get it to work correctly in more complex situtations where there are other valid segments present. This requires a more complex analysis of the incoming value than should really be necessary when eliminating a trivial copy. In a similar situation where undef copies are eliminated, an IMPLICIT_DEF is inserted in place to give a corresponding ins...

...t attribute i have set in the ldap server. Regarding the manpage of sssd.conf the lines access_provider = ldap ldap_access_order = host ldap_user_authorized_host = host should be correct. login with the wrong password gives a denied login. login with the correct password always works. This is my sitution since the begin of my thread. When i login from a "wrong" host which is different than the one in the host attribute of the ldap, i expect a message like the one from my opensuse boxes where it works: opensuse: sshd[7926]: pam_sss(sshd:account): Access denied for user >username&g...

...an existing domain after I configure it as a BDC with the PDC's SID. It complains "Failed to setup BDC creds". It looks like the communication between samba and openldap is OK since I can managing user/group with USRMGR.EXE. However, a few questions puzzles me: 1. In what situtation do I need People group as the group for machines? 2. Should the PDC itself be in the ldap backend database? 3. In the /etc/ldap.conf, if I turn on the nss staff, I cannot log in to the dmain anymore. It said "User does not exist". Here are the specs of my setup:...

...e stack (stdcall calling convention). The call is not suitable for > tail call, if b and c cleans the stack differently. For example, let b > has C CC and c - stdcall CC. In this case making tail call results to > double cleaning (on in a and one in c), which is incorrect. > 2. The same situtation is for struct return functions: the caller > pushes > extra pointer to return value, but callee is required to clean this > pointer out of the stack. So, call b->c is "suitable for tail call" > iff > both b and c are struct return. > 3. Various tricky cases w...