search for: sitter

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "sitter".

Did you mean: jitter
2006 Apr 11
4
Bootstrap and Jackknife Bias using Survey Package
...n of analysis is Maputo City, the Capital of Mozambique. I just compute the sampling errors using Survey Package, but i have some droubles: 1. How to compute Bootstrap and Jackknife Bias of estimates, like mean? 2. How to see each replicate estimate of the parameter? 3. Is it possible to use the Sitter algoritm in Bootstrap for stratified and multi-stage sampling in Survey Package? Or is possible to use the pseudo-population (obtained by replication the sample) in estimation using Bootstrap? Thanks before hand to anyone how can help me!
2008 Dec 25
3
2 internet connections and one for backup
I've got 2 internet connections but unfortunately not the same - 6mbit and 1 mbit. My default is 6mbit and I want to create backup connection (1mbit). How can do it? Has anybody done it? My perfect scenario is that my network uses 1mbit if (only) 6mbit fails and it switches automatically. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be
2008 Mar 05
1
testing for significantly different slopes
Hi, How would one go about determining if the slope terms from an analysis of covariance model are different from eachother? Based on the example from MASS: library(MASS) # parallel slope model l.para <- lm(Temp ~ Gas + Insul, data=whiteside) # multiple slope model l.mult <- lm(Temp ~ Insul/Gas -1, data=whiteside) # compare nested models: anova(l.para, l.mult) Analysis of Variance
2020 Mar 28
0
[klibc:update-dash] dash: builtin: Use test_access from NetBSD when faccessat is unavailable
...nd is the result of interpretation + * request PASC 1003.2-92 #23 submitted for IEEE Std 1003.2-1992. + * + * That interpretation can be found here: + * + * http://www.pasc.org/interps/unofficial/db/p1003.2/pasc-1003.2-23.html + * + * Not terribly helpful, unfortunately. I wonder who that fence sitter was. + * + * Worse, IMVNSHO, I think the authors of 1003.2b-D12 have mis-interpreted the + * PASC interpretation and appear to be gone against at least one widely used + * implementation (namely 4.4BSD). The problem is that for file access by root + * this means that if test '-r' and '...