search for: sitelists

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 21 matches for "sitelists".

Did you mean: sitelist
2012 May 08
1
deploying class *only* via puppet kick
I''m trying to set up a system in which the web devs can deploy new websites via puppet kick. I''m not having a problem with puppet kick itself, but rather figuring out how to make my "webserver::sitelist" class *only* get deployed via puppet kick, and not have it regularly evaluated in the nodes.pp file. I don''t want webserver::sitelist to ever get
2017 Nov 21
2
Problem with not fixable dangling forward links
Hello List, In preparation to update my samba ad-dc's running debian wheezy with backported samba 4.6.8 to 4.7.3. I'd like to fix two errors showing up in dbcheck whom hab been reported by dbckech --cross-ncs for an long time but without causing any issues so far. I'm getting this error on my main dc root at server:~# samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs Checking 4188 objects ERROR: no
2017 Nov 25
1
Problem with not fixable dangling forward links
Am 25.11.2017 um 16:55 schrieb Achim Gottinger via samba: > > > Am 25.11.2017 um 04:39 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: >> On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 11:55 +1300, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >>> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 11:21 +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba wrote: >>>> Hello List, >>>> >>>> In preparation to update my samba ad-dc's running
2017 Nov 25
2
Problem with not fixable dangling forward links
On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 11:55 +1300, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 11:21 +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba wrote: > > Hello List, > > > > In preparation to update my samba ad-dc's running debian wheezy with > > backported samba 4.6.8 to 4.7.3. > > I'd like to fix two errors showing up in dbcheck whom hab been reported > > by
2018 Jan 22
0
[Patches] AD Database corruption after upgrade from <= 4.6 to 4.7 (bug #13228)
Am 22.01.2018 um 22:12 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:24:44PM +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba wrote: >> Am 22.01.2018 um 10:49 schrieb Stefan Metzmacher via samba: >>> Also DO NOT repair the following errors with samba-tool dbcheck! >>> "Remove duplicate links in attribute" >>> and >>> "ERROR: orphaned backlink"
2013 Jul 20
1
BH correction with p.adjust
...was: pBH = p*n/i where p is the original p value, n is the number of tests and i is the rank of the p value. However when I try and recreate the corrected p from my most significant value it does not match up to the one computed by the method p.adjust: > setwd("C:/work/Methylation/IMA/GM/siteLists") > > hypTable <- read.delim("hypernormal vs others.txt") > pList <- hypTable$p > names(pList) <- hypTable$site > > adjusted <- p.adjust(pList, method="BH") > adjusted[1] cg27433479 0.05030589 > > pList[1]*nrow(hypTable)/1 cg27433...
2017 Nov 23
0
Problem with not fixable dangling forward links
On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 11:21 +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba wrote: > Hello List, > > In preparation to update my samba ad-dc's running debian wheezy with > backported samba 4.6.8 to 4.7.3. > I'd like to fix two errors showing up in dbcheck whom hab been reported > by dbckech --cross-ncs for an long time but without causing any issues > so far. > > I'm
2017 Nov 25
0
Problem with not fixable dangling forward links
Am 25.11.2017 um 04:39 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 11:55 +1300, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 11:21 +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba wrote: >>> Hello List, >>> >>> In preparation to update my samba ad-dc's running debian wheezy with >>> backported samba 4.6.8 to 4.7.3. >>> I'd like to fix
2005 Jun 25
1
Getting Mailman Running
On a CentOS 4 box, I'm trying to get Mailman running. I found the apache conf file in /etc/httpd/conf.d and set the servername in that. When I try to go there, I get a 500 internal server error.. when I try to start Mailman, I get Starting mailman: Site list is missing: mailman I've never run Mailman before.. looked in the /etc/mailman/sitelist.cfg.. don't see anything in there
2018 Jan 22
2
[Patches] AD Database corruption after upgrade from <= 4.6 to 4.7 (bug #13228)
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:24:44PM +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba wrote: > Am 22.01.2018 um 10:49 schrieb Stefan Metzmacher via samba: > > Also DO NOT repair the following errors with samba-tool dbcheck! > > "Remove duplicate links in attribute" > > and > > "ERROR: orphaned backlink" > > as this removes the ability to repair the database >
2016 Feb 10
2
AD + Bind DLZ + Site
My answer below. 2016-02-10 15:38 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 10/02/16 14:07, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> >> >> 2016-02-10 14:37 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org <mailto: >> rpenny at samba.org>>: >> >> >> On 10/02/16 11:12, mathias dufresne wrote: >> >> Hi all, >>
2002 Aug 23
2
Random "File Not Found" errors Using Samba, Works on NetApp
I am experiencing a strange problem where I am randomly getting "file not found" error messages on a Samba share when they are accessed via a series of tcl scripts running from a Win2K server. Some of the scripts are located on the 2K server and some reside on the Samba share. Unfortunately, this is a third party application and I do not know enough tcl to usefully troubleshoot it from
2016 Feb 10
2
AD + Bind DLZ + Site
2016-02-10 14:37 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 10/02/16 11:12, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Using 4.3.4 + Bind DLZ @ Centos 7. >> >> Regarding AD sites, I have several questions: >> >> 1° Is it possible with Samba4 to rename Default-First-Site-Name? >> > > Depends on what you mean, if you mean
2016 Feb 10
2
AD + Bind DLZ + Site
2016-02-10 16:54 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 10/02/16 15:36, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> My answer below. >> >> 2016-02-10 15:38 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org <mailto: >> rpenny at samba.org>>: >> >> On 10/02/16 14:07, mathias dufresne wrote: >> >> >> >>
2016 Feb 10
0
AD + Bind DLZ + Site
On 10/02/16 14:07, mathias dufresne wrote: > > > 2016-02-10 14:37 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org > <mailto:rpenny at samba.org>>: > > On 10/02/16 11:12, mathias dufresne wrote: > > Hi all, > > Using 4.3.4 + Bind DLZ @ Centos 7. > > Regarding AD sites, I have several questions: > > 1° Is it
2019 Oct 02
3
Removed a DC but...
Hai, The steps shown here dont work? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demoting_a_Samba_AD_DC If that is the case and you besides that free of errors. Then upgrade, and try again once your on at least samba 4.9 or 4.10. As im hoping you are upgrade straight to Buster. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
2016 Feb 10
0
AD + Bind DLZ + Site
On 10/02/16 15:36, mathias dufresne wrote: > My answer below. > > 2016-02-10 15:38 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org > <mailto:rpenny at samba.org>>: > > On 10/02/16 14:07, mathias dufresne wrote: > > > > 2016-02-10 14:37 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org > <mailto:rpenny at samba.org>
2016 Feb 10
0
AD + Bind DLZ + Site
On 10/02/16 16:27, mathias dufresne wrote: > > > 2016-02-10 16:54 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org > <mailto:rpenny at samba.org>>: > > On 10/02/16 15:36, mathias dufresne wrote: > > My answer below. > > 2016-02-10 15:38 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org > <mailto:rpenny at samba.org>
2019 Oct 02
0
Removed a DC but...
samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix Yes, should be possible, but i normaly do that after i do the following. search for : CN=58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f And CN=16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75 In _msdc.dom.tld. Verify which GUID is removed, you can see that, then remove the old server GUID. Run : dig CNAME 58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it dig CNAME
2019 Aug 30
2
backup AD content
On 30.08.19 11:01, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > I'm very sorry to advise that this script is not race-free in the > locking done on the AD databases, which is why we have written the > 'samba-tool domain backup offline' tool which holds the correct locks. > > You should only need to back up the domain on one DC as long as you are > confident the DC is correctly