Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "sitelc".
Did you mean:
sitelb
2011 Dec 24
1
Nested model - "singularities not defined"
...SiteLB -2.25571 1.55732 -1.448
0.14904
TreatmentReference:SiteLB -2.25333 1.60382 -1.405
0.16156
TreatmentSingle Tree:SiteLB 0.43286 1.99213 0.217
0.82821
TreatmentTypical:SiteLB 0.64371 1.45484 0.442
0.65863
TreatmentIntensive:SiteLC -3.89000 2.15175 -1.808 0.07212
.
TreatmentReference:SiteLC 0.91300 1.66673 0.548
0.58445
TreatmentSingle Tree:SiteLC -1.59800 2.07878 -0.769
0.44296
TreatmentTypical:SiteLC 0.10000 1.32809 0.075
0.94005
TreatmentIntensive:Sit...
2006 Feb 04
1
Mixed models and missing p-value...
...4.7184 1164.523 1149.437
Random effects:
Groups Name Variance Std.Dev.
patelle (Intercept) 34.995 5.9157
Residual 744.736 27.2899
# of obs: 123, groups: patelle, 33
Fixed effects:
Estimate Std. Error t value
(Intercept) 60.3483 4.3929 13.7378
siteLCN -20.1969 7.8070 -2.5870
siteLCS -18.2154 6.1514 -2.9612
Correlation of Fixed Effects:
(Intr) sitLCN
siteLCN -0.563
siteLCS -0.714 0.402
I don't understand why D.F. and p-values associated to the fixed-effects
coefficients are missing.
Could anyone help me?
When I...