search for: site38

Hi folks, I have the two firewalls (Slackware current) in differnt cities connected via OpenVPN. I can ping the network behind server firewall from client firewall server. But how to route/iptable network traffic from the network behind client firewall to see the netwrok behind server firewall? Thank you Remus

I''ve made some tests... eth2 is my internal interface, LAN is connected here. Before I had IMQ device in AB mode... PREROUTING [A]fter NAT, POSTROUTING [B]efore NAT. I want the same situation on ifb. I do this in this way: --- # incoming traffic here from LAN is before NAT tc qdisc add dev eth2 handle ffff: ingress # outcoming traffic here from WAN is after NAT tc qdisc add dev eth2

Hi! I have a curious problem. I updated my Fedora Core 1 box yesterday from samba-3.0.2 to samba-3.0.6. All the packages that were suggested by yum. I have the box join an NT4 Domain, and while yesterday before the update a smbstatus would list the users as CENTRUM+Username (CENTRUM is my NT Domain) today it refuses to do so, and any shares apart from the public ones are not available any

Hi! Using samba-3.0.11 or 3.0.11rc1 on RH9 Win Clients are XP SP2 I have a problem with sharing an ACCESS2000 mdb file on a samba share. The first user can open the file without any trouble. The next user (or the same user again) has to wait a timed 4 minutes before the database opens for him. I have tried a number of various locking options (oplocks = no, veto oplocks file = *\.mdb, even

Hi I am using samba 3.0.7-2 on my FC1 box as a PDC with a backend of tdbsam and I would like to set up a BDC for the domain as well. The big samba book tells me it can be done with tdbsam, but is wary about the machine passwords changing, thus breaking the replication done with rsync. I don't have the time right now to get into an ldap backend, so I was wondering if there is a way to

Hi again, sorry to be such a bother. I got my setup to work with kernel 2.6.8.1, however the two machines where I need to implement the shaping are running a 2.4.27 kernel. I have applied the infamous June patch (htbfair.diff) already, and recompiled the modules. And I am using the tc that comes with htb3.6-020525.tgz. While I can see the packets going into the right class, it does not

Hi! Soryr about being a whiner, not enough sleep and too much frustration don''t become too well. In any case, I have succeeded with the shaping now. The problem seems to have been twofold. First of all I had the rate too high for the actual throughput. We have a 1mbit connection to the internet, and after lowering the rate of the parent to 800kbit, and sharing that between the

Hi, I am still struggling with details on this setup. I have the shaping work well with some applications and not with others. Here''s what I have: #!/bin/bash tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 20 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 800kbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 650kbit ceil 110kbps burst 15k prio

Hi! I have a setup where I want to prefer traffic on one port (for testing purposes I used port 22) my setup is : tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 96mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:7 htb rate 2mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 96mbit burst 15k tc class add dev

Hi, I have a smb pdc running which works quite well so far, and would like to know if this feature is possible. I have two locations, and I want all users to authenticate on Machine A. Howver there are some users that are closer to machine B, and I would like to be able to have the homes of those users on machine B rather than machine A (they should authenticate on machine A anyway). Is this

Hi! I have just started with traffic shaping, and after hours of reading websites, man pages asf. I am still stumped at one problem I have. The interface eth0 is attached to the outside world, and I have an openvpn tunnel to another part of the organization using eth0 and port 5001. The idea was that all traffic going through the tunnel would have top priority and the rest share