Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "sirqs".
Did you mean:
irqs
2011 Feb 18
5
Native Instruments Battery3
Hi to all,
I'm trying to run Battery3 with Wine, but I'm experiencing some problems.
1. When I launch Battery (command line) I see these messages:
---
fixme:win:RegisterDeviceNotificationW (hwnd=0x50062, filter=0x32fcb0,flags=0x00000004) returns a fake device notification handle!
JackActivationCount::Signal value = 0 ref = 5
JackActivationCount::Signal value = 0 ref = 5
2013 Oct 17
2
Many "smbd" process with "D" uninterruptible sleep status
I got a samba server(Linux) to store some data in my PC(windows)
frequently. And last night I found that samba can't work. After logined to
samba server and found that there's 91 smbd processes with status "D"
totally.
# ps
169 root 0 SW [pdflush]
170 root 0 DW [pdflush]
....
29534 simon 20608 D /sbin/smbd -D
29548 root 2792 D
2015 Apr 14
1
ksoftirqd / centos7
Hi,
Today I migrated a server form C6 to C7. The machine is dedicated for a
couple of redis daemons. given the traffic etc, we see cpu0 being 100% in
use immediately. No problem, had the same thing on the C6 server.
So I pinned certain processes/irq's to other CPU's and made irqbalance was
monitoring things. That did solve the issue in C6, but not this time.
The links below contain the
2008 Jun 27
2
PCI device assignment to guests (userspace)
Userspace patches for the pci-passthrough functionality.
The major updates since the last post are:
- Loop to add passthrough devices in pc_init1
- Handle errors in read/write calls
- Allow invocation without irq number for in-kernel irqchip
Other than this, several small things were fixed according to review comments received last time.
2008 Jun 27
2
PCI device assignment to guests (userspace)
Userspace patches for the pci-passthrough functionality.
The major updates since the last post are:
- Loop to add passthrough devices in pc_init1
- Handle errors in read/write calls
- Allow invocation without irq number for in-kernel irqchip
Other than this, several small things were fixed according to review comments received last time.
2007 Apr 18
5
[patch 0/4] Revised softlockup watchdog improvement patches
Hi Ingo,
This series of patches implements a number of improvements to the
softlockup watchdog and its users.
They are:
1. Make the watchdog ignore stolen time
When running under a hypervisor, the kernel may lose an arbitrary amount
of time as "stolen time". This may cause the softlockup watchdog to
trigger spruiously. Xen and VMI implement sched_clock() as measuring
unstolen time,
2007 Apr 18
5
[patch 0/4] Revised softlockup watchdog improvement patches
Hi Ingo,
This series of patches implements a number of improvements to the
softlockup watchdog and its users.
They are:
1. Make the watchdog ignore stolen time
When running under a hypervisor, the kernel may lose an arbitrary amount
of time as "stolen time". This may cause the softlockup watchdog to
trigger spruiously. Xen and VMI implement sched_clock() as measuring
unstolen time,
2013 Jun 03
0
[virtio_blk] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ff7f5784
Greetings,
I got the below dmesg and the first bad commit is
commit b70aa55ec9532d5f5d3e367e4cad8997b1135f86
Author: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk>
Date: Fri May 24 20:22:33 2013 +0200
virtio_blk: blk-mq support
Pretend we have 4 issue queues.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk>
[ 277.857736] blk-mq: CPU -> queue map
[ 277.871142] CPU 0
2013 Jun 03
0
[virtio_blk] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ff7f5784
Greetings,
I got the below dmesg and the first bad commit is
commit b70aa55ec9532d5f5d3e367e4cad8997b1135f86
Author: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk>
Date: Fri May 24 20:22:33 2013 +0200
virtio_blk: blk-mq support
Pretend we have 4 issue queues.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk>
[ 277.857736] blk-mq: CPU -> queue map
[ 277.871142] CPU 0
2010 Nov 08
89
Re: DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3 on 2.6.37-rc* ?
On Sun, Nov 07 2010 at 6:05pm -0500,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 10:39:23PM +0100, Milan Broz wrote:
> > On 11/07/2010 08:45 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >> I read about barrier-problems and data getting to the partition when
> > >> using dm-crypt and several layers so I don''t know if that could be
> >