search for: sirish

Hi, Here's a patch for Hexagon Packetizer for review. This patch does not yield any warnings. Sirish -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc is a member of Code Aurora Forum -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: HexagonPacketizer.patch URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120418/b3754c4e/attachment.ksh>

No test cases for a 500k patch? -eric On Apr 18, 2012, at 9:18 PM, Sirish Pande wrote: > Hi, > > Here's a patch for Hexagon Packetizer for review. This patch does not yield any warnings. > > Sirish > > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc is a member of Code Aurora Forum > > <HexagonPacketizer.patch>__________________________...

Here's a patch that contains Hexagon Test cases. Please review. Sirish -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc is a member of Code Aurora Forum -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: HexagonTestCases.patch URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120420/eb32dede/attachment.ksh>

...phole optimization for squenece of instructions that identifies branch termiantor, compare, load, gep etc and converts them to a call to memcmp. This small pass gave me improvement of 67% on SPEC2000 bzip2 on X86. Is there a better idea, other than small peephole pass on IR to optimize this code? Sirish -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170519/0880884b/attachment.html>

...999A for 9.1) for a corresponding floating point number. The routine convertToHexString in APFFloat class only prints in C99 Floating point hexagondecimal constant (eg 1.e00000p3). Without writing my own routine, how do I get to print the hexadecimal representation for a floating point value? Sirish -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc is a member of Code Aurora Forum -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120305/6dae85a2/attachment.html>

Hi, Here's a Hexagon patch for replacing transfer/copy instructions to combine for review. This patch does not yield any warnings on Hexagon, Arm and X86 build on Linux. This work is by Arnold Schwaighofer. Sirish -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc is a member of Code Aurora Forum -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: HexagonTransferToCombine.patch URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120418/891b0678/attachment.ksh...

On Apr 20, 2012, at 1:58 PM, Sirish Pande <spande at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Here's a patch that contains Hexagon Test cases. Please review. You can't include these in the patches that they're supposed to go along with? -eric

Sure I can do that. In that case, let me recreate all the patches (along with the test cases) and put up the patches for review. sirish On 4/20/2012 4:16 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > On Apr 20, 2012, at 1:58 PM, Sirish Pande<spande at codeaurora.org> wrote: > >> Here's a patch that contains Hexagon Test cases. Please review. > You can't include these in the patches that they're supposed to go alo...

...it's common > and matters a lot, awesome. > I wouldn't do it just to fix SPEC :P > > (people who care about bzip2 speed probably use any of the faster bzip2 > impls :P) > Danny, do you know of forks of bzip2 that are more efficient than bzip.org? I haven't seen one. Sirish is going to send a patch to Julian Seward and try to get the change in a new release of bzip2, and from there we may need to ask the AOSP folks to update bzip2. AOSP has the last released bzip2 from Sept 2010. For SPEC benchmarketing, doing the right thing wouldn't help. Maybe we should put t...

...n the following in ISDOpcodes.h SETO, // 0 1 1 1 True if ordered (no nans) SETUO, // 1 0 0 0 True if unordered: isnan(X) | isnan(Y) Is it safe to assume that SETO is not of SETUO? We have support for setuo in the architecture but not seto. Sirish -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120710/5726ca3f/attachment.html>

Here's a Hexagon patch for Hexagon New Value Jump instructions for review. This patch does not yield any warnings on Hexagon, Arm and X86 build on Linux. Sirish -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc is a member of Code Aurora Forum -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: HexagonNewValueJump.patch URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120419/8866182f/attachment.ksh>

Here's a Hexagon cfe patch for floating point support. Please take some time to review this patch. This patch does not yield any warnings on Hexagon, Arm and X86 build on Linux. Sirish -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc is a member of Code Aurora Forum -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: HexagonV5-FP-Support-cfe.patch URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120419/f1b8c596/attachment.ksh...

Here's a Hexagon llvm patch for floating point support. Please take some time to review this patch. This patch does not yield any warnings on Hexagon, Arm and X86 build on Linux. Sirish -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc is a member of Code Aurora Forum -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: HexagonV5-FP-Support-llvm.patch URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120419/b015a7b6/attachment.ks...

On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 11:41:43 -0500 Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> > wrote: > >> Why don't you call it with "Promote" instead of > >> "Custom" and let the Legalizer do the job? Does it not work? > > > > I tried this, and the legalizer will

Sure I will split it and put it in two patches. Give me few hours. I need to test those patches. Sirish On 4/19/2012 8:40 AM, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:18:05PM -0500, Sirish Pande wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here's a patch for Hexagon Packetizer for review. This patch does >> not yield any warnings. >> > Would it be possible to split this patch...