search for: sinle

Hi Lists, I have one box with two FXO and two FXS ports, it is running asterisk inside. I have one sinle POTS line connected to the one FXO and two phone sets connected to the FXS port. Extension 6003 is asigned to one fxs and 6004 is asigned to another fxs, the two extensions can call each other, they can both make/receive PSTN call, but they can't make PSTN call simultaneously. Is it achievble...

All, I am new to using R and know some basics. I wish to use kriging in R to do the following: given data Y =f(X1,X2,X3,.....,Xn) --1000+ irregular measured data set. I would like to be able to get a single value y given sinle input set (x1,x2,x3,...xn) A google search on this takes me lierally to the same example on involving analysis with soil sampling and I cannot figure out how to extract single point interpolant. Any examples or pointers appreciated, Numeris. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I am trying to cross-compile libc++ from my x86_64 linux system to armv7hf. We have our own gcc compiler that we build with crosstools-ng (based on gcc 6.3.0) and I set my environment like this: CC=armv7a-plex-linux-gnueabihf-gcc CXX=armv7a-plex-linux-gnueabihf-g++ CFLAGS=-fPIC -DPIC -mfloat-abi=hard -march=armv7-a -Os -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 --sysroot=<path> CXXFLAGS=-fPIC -DPIC

At first glance, it looks like long double functions (such as fabsl and friends) are missing from your sysroot's <math.h>. Does your target support long double at all? -Dimitry > On 6 Feb 2018, at 09:51, Tobias Hieta via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am trying to cross-compile libc++ from my x86_64 linux system to armv7hf. We have

Hello Dimitry and thanks for your answer. I am pretty sure it does indeed support long double. It's configured with vfpv3-d16 - but I noticed that c++config.h in gcc has _GLIBCXX__HAS_FABSL and friends are undefined. I think I need to look deeper at the configuration of our toolchain. long double support is required in libc++ then I gather? -- Tobias On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:47 AM,

Hello, I am trying to cross-compile libc++ from my x86_64 linux system to armv7hf. We have our own gcc compiler that we build with crosstools-ng (based on gcc 6.3.0) and I set my environment like this: CC=armv7a-plex-linux-gnueabihf-gcc CXX=armv7a-plex-linux-gnueabihf-g++ CFLAGS=-fPIC -DPIC -mfloat-abi=hard -march=armv7-a -Os -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 --sysroot=<path> CXXFLAGS=-fPIC -DPIC

Hi Paul, > I am working on a pass to convert lib calls to intrinsic calls as discussed here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-January/058507.html this whole area is a little confusing. If you can recognize a libcall as being equivalent to an intrinsic, you could indeed turn it into an intrinsic, but on the other hand you could just directly do on it the IR transforms you want

Hi, I am working on a pass to convert lib calls to intrinsic calls as discussed here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-January/058507.html In my first attempt I created a FunctionPass that uses CallInst::setCalledFunction to replace the callee with the appropriate intrinsic (using Intrinsic::getDeclaration). After the pass runs I get an assertion from CallGraphSCCPass:

I've been working on some basic library call optimizations, the SimplifyLibCalls pass (lib/Transforms/IPO/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp). Tonight I conjured up a list of the potential libcall simplifications that could be done. There's a lot of them. I could use some help if anyone wants to pitch in. The individual optimizations are self-contained and fairly straight forward to write. They range

It seems that fast-isel for intel does not handle strlen. It's a general problem in fast-isel . ~/llvmw/build/Deb~/llvmw/build/Debug+Asserts/bin/clang -O0 -mllvm -fast-isel-verbose -mllvm -fast-isel strlen1.c strlen1.c:12:3: warning: implicitly declaring library function 'printf' with type 'int (const char *, ...)' printf("%i\n", len); ^

Hello all, I'm currently investigating the option to completely replace a SBS2003 DC with a Samba4 DC. My research (mostly on samba.org guides) shows that it is feasible, however I'd like to get feedback from the community on my goals. Current status: A Windows SBS 2003 is the PDC and a W2008 R2 server is acting as secondary DC. Domain operational level is 2003. There are ~40-50

...n option (and btw, have you not considered Server Essentials since you don't need Exchange?). We've been running Samba4 AD/DC as a SBS2008 replacement (DNS server, redirected folders, mail server, ...) for nearly 2 years with no problems whatsoever, and without the domain users noticing a sinle hiccup. I'll share the basics of what we did. My internal documentation is 49 pages long, so this message will, of necessity, be abbreviated. After trying other distros I settled on Slackware64 14.1 where everything pretty much worked out of the box. Your favorite distro should also work...

1.6.1 svn 190575: CC="cc" CXX="g++" LD="" AR="" RANLIB="" CFLAGS="" make -C menuselect CONFIGURE_SILENT="--silent" menuselect make[1]: Entering directory `/home/asterisk/rpmbuild/BUILD/asterisk-1.6.1/menuselect' gcc -m64 -march=native -mtune=native -floop-interchange -floop-strip-mine -floop-block -c -o