search for: singlesourc

...arks/Prolangs-C/simulator/simulator MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/trees/trees MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-smail/unix-smail MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-tbl/unix-tbl MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/exptree SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hello SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/reversefile SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/spellcheck SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wordfreq Si...

...| * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/simulator/simulator | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/plot2fig | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-04-22-Switch | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-31-LongShifts | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest3 | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-08-19-C...

...ource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi ^^ no idea cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie ^^ cbe doesn't support inline asm (bzero lowering) jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots ^^ no idea llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build2 jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build2 cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build2 llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build cbe /S...

... 5.21    5.51 >  5.24 *           5.82 | 0.95    0.99    n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4                             | > 9.2000 1943356  5.4000      *                5.1900      |    0.76 * >  0.64 *           6.36 | n/a     1.19    n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects                        | > 0.2100 37048    0.1799      *                0.1500      |    3.97    3.53 >  3.43 *           3.66 | 1.12    1.16    n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll                            | > 1.0500 3...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...560 | 12.90 16.16 11.95 * 12.33 | 0.80 1.08 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4 | 17.1437 3106240 * * * | 3087.78 * * * * | n/a n/a n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/almabench | 0.0213 11396 0.0294 * 0.0287 | 38.31 36.35 28.09 * 27.65 | 1.05 1.36 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench | 0.1059 21900 0.0889...

...r 2. Building everything from source (no pre-built binaries used) BUILD LLVM WITH GCC 4.0.3 * No issues, just the usual warnings. BUILD LLVM-GCC WITH GCC 4.0.3 * No issues RUN LLVM-TEST WITH GCC 4.0.3 * The following failures were encountered. Some of them are explainable: TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.expandfft TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.expandfft TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.isamax TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.isamax TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft TEST-FAIL: cbe...

...ad) in the C++ tests in the testsuite, see below. Note that this tester is often under heavy load due to other users, so take timing results with a pinch of salt (a pinch is about +-10% in my experience with this tester). Ciao, Duncan. > Significant changes in test results: > GCCAS: > singlesource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects: -102.68% (0.5960 => 1.2080) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: -44.04% (5.3323 => 7.6804) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: -10.34% (5.6883 => 6.2763) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simpl...

...120 | 20.58 23.14 16.59 * 16.82 | 0.89 1.24 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4 | 24.6495 3434392 12.9488 * 11.6887 | 42.76 59.15 65.26 * 76.23 | 0.72 0.66 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/almabench | 0.0240 11080 0.0280 * 0.0280 | 46.08 42.91 43.76 * 42.42 | 1.07 1.05 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench | 0.1320 22880 0.1120...

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...> * 5.82 | 0.95 0.99 n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d- > v4 | 9.2000 1943356 5.4000 > * 5.1900 | 0.76 * 0.64 * > 6.36 | n/a 1.19 n/a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/ > functionobjects | 0.2100 37048 0.1799 > * 0.1500 | 3.97 3.53 3.43 * > 3.66 | 1.12 1.16 n/a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/ > loop_unroll...

...357 | 12.84 15.00 10.37 * 10.08 | 0.86 1.24 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4 | 15.4365 3521580 7.7456 * 6.9083 | 24.19 * 36.82 * 44.74 | n/a 0.66 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/almabench | 0.0218 11112 0.0232 * 0.0240 | 26.51 25.41 25.34 * 25.20 | 1.04 1.05 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench | 0.1059 22156 0.0843...

...948 | 5.32 7.00 5.98 * 6.15 | 0.76 0.89 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4 | 6.7694 3056044 * * * | 14.26 * * * * | n/a n/a n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/almabench | 0.0097 11452 0.0131 * 0.0145 | 15.70 15.09 15.29 * 15.71 | 1.04 1.03 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench | 0.0477 22108 0.0412...

I created the 1.9 release branch last night. As a reminder, please do not check in any code changes to the release branch. Please send me email if you have changes that need to be merged into the release branch. To check out the release branch: cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm-test cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r

...except: XPASS: /proj/llvm/rel1.9/llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2006-07-31-PR854.c # of expected passes 1542 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures 41 LLVM-TEST NIGHTLY WITH LLVM-GCC3 (FAIL) * The following tests fail: TEST-FAIL: compile /SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-01-23-InitializedBitField TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-01-23-InitializedBitField TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-01-23-InitializedBitField TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-01-23-InitializedBitField TEST-FAIL: compile /SingleSource/UnitTests/2006...

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

LLVMers, The LLVM 1.9 Prerelease is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.9/ If anyone can spare some time, please download the appropriate tarballs for your platform and test the release (at least with make check). I'd also appreciate any documentation reviews. Please note that llvm-gcc3 on x86 may not have a clean dejagnu run. You should see one XPASS for

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

Hi all, I've started looking at the GlobalMerge pass, enabled by default on ARM and AArch64. I think we should reconsider that, at least for AArch64. As is, the pass just merges all globals together, in groups of 4KB (AArch64, 128B on ARM). At the time it was enabled, the general thinking was "it's almost free, it doesn't affect performance much, we might as well use it".

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make