search for: single_loop_param_less_equal

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "single_loop_param_less_equal".

2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
...Polly :: CodeGen/do_pluto_matmult.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll I have some guesses for these, but it would be good to get run llvm-lit -v on these three test cases. > Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_equal.ll > Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_than.ll This is due to the use of an old isl version. I will change configure to fail if the isl version used is too old. > Are these darwin-specific or due to the fact that I am using isl 0.10 and > cloog 0.17 rather than their the u...
2012 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
...ing this so quickly. Do you have any comments on failing tests we are seeing on x86_64-apple-darwin11? Failing Tests (5): Polly :: CodeGen/do_pluto_matmult.ll Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_equal.ll Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_than.ll Are these darwin-specific or due to the fact that I am using isl 0.10 and cloog 0.17 rather than their the upstream development svn? Let me know if any of those merit a bugzilla of their own. Jack > >From 8621fa79089a9769a8...
2012 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
...tmult.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll > > I have some guesses for these, but it would be good to get run > > llvm-lit -v on these three test cases. > >> Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_equal.ll >> Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_than.ll Tobias, I am unclear on how I should modify the 'make polly-test' run in order for 'llvm-lit -v' to take effect and where to look for the additional information. Thanks in advance for any clarifications. > &...
2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On 10/21/2012 11:46 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:35:49PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
2012 Oct 21
4
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
...: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll >>> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll >> >> I have some guesses for these, but it would be good to get run >> >> llvm-lit -v on these three test cases. >> >>> Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_equal.ll >>> Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_than.ll > > Tobias, > I am unclear on how I should modify the 'make polly-test' run in order > for 'llvm-lit -v' to take effect and where to look for the additional information. > Thanks in advance f...