Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "single_loop_param_less_equal".
2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
...Polly :: CodeGen/do_pluto_matmult.ll
> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll
> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll
I have some guesses for these, but it would be good to get run
llvm-lit -v on these three test cases.
> Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_equal.ll
> Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_than.ll
This is due to the use of an old isl version. I will change configure to
fail if the isl version used is too old.
> Are these darwin-specific or due to the fact that I am using isl 0.10 and
> cloog 0.17 rather than their the u...
2012 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
...ing this so quickly.
Do you have any comments on failing tests we are seeing on x86_64-apple-darwin11?
Failing Tests (5):
Polly :: CodeGen/do_pluto_matmult.ll
Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll
Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll
Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_equal.ll
Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_than.ll
Are these darwin-specific or due to the fact that I am using isl 0.10 and
cloog 0.17 rather than their the upstream development svn? Let me know if
any of those merit a bugzilla of their own.
Jack
> >From 8621fa79089a9769a8...
2012 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
...tmult.ll
>> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll
>> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll
>
> I have some guesses for these, but it would be good to get run
>
> llvm-lit -v on these three test cases.
>
>> Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_equal.ll
>> Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_than.ll
Tobias,
I am unclear on how I should modify the 'make polly-test' run in order
for 'llvm-lit -v' to take effect and where to look for the additional information.
Thanks in advance for any clarifications.
>
&...
2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On 10/21/2012 11:46 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:35:49PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>> On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>>>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
2012 Oct 21
4
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
...: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll
>>> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll
>>
>> I have some guesses for these, but it would be good to get run
>>
>> llvm-lit -v on these three test cases.
>>
>>> Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_equal.ll
>>> Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_than.ll
>
> Tobias,
> I am unclear on how I should modify the 'make polly-test' run in order
> for 'llvm-lit -v' to take effect and where to look for the additional information.
> Thanks in advance f...