search for: single_loop

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "single_loop".

2011 Jun 10
2
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example
...:: CodeGen/loop_with_condition_nested.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/reduction_2.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/sequential_loops.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/single_loop.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/single_loop_param.ll > >Interesting. On what kind of Platform are you running this? Is it still >Ubuntu 11.04? I assume it's an intel platform, but is it a 32-bit or 64bit? It is a little bit complicated. Intel Core i5 M520. Ubuntu 11.04-i386 using...
2011 Jun 10
2
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example
...on Windows 7 Professional(64bit). > > So it's 32bit. Certainly. >>> >>> The test cases that are failing are the ones that use 'lli' to execute >>> the generated program. There seems to be something wrong in respect to >>> lli. Can you run e.g. single_loop.ll with llvm-lit (-v) and show the >>> error message. >> >> OK. This is the message. >> >> -------- >> tomohiro at ubuntu:~/llvm/tools/polly/test/CodeGen$ llvm-lit -v >> single_loop.ll >> llvm-lit: lit.cfg:94: note: using out-of-tree build at >&...
2011 Jun 10
0
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example
...buntu 11.04-i386 using VMWare Player on Windows 7 Professional(64bit). So it's 32bit. >> >> The test cases that are failing are the ones that use 'lli' to execute >> the generated program. There seems to be something wrong in respect to >> lli. Can you run e.g. single_loop.ll with llvm-lit (-v) and show the >> error message. > > OK. This is the message. > > -------- > tomohiro at ubuntu:~/llvm/tools/polly/test/CodeGen$ llvm-lit -v single_loop.ll > llvm-lit: lit.cfg:94: note: using out-of-tree build at '/home/tomohiro/build/ > tools/poll...
2011 Jun 10
4
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example
...2bit. >> >> Certainly. >> >>>>> >>>>> The test cases that are failing are the ones that use 'lli' to execute >>>>> the generated program. There seems to be something wrong in respect to >>>>> lli. Can you run e.g. single_loop.ll with llvm-lit (-v) and show the >>>>> error message. >>>> >>>> OK. This is the message. >>>> >>>> -------- >>>> tomohiro at ubuntu:~/llvm/tools/polly/test/CodeGen$ llvm-lit -v >>>> single_loop.ll >>>&...
2011 Jun 10
0
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example
...;> >> So it's 32bit. > > Certainly. > >>>> >>>> The test cases that are failing are the ones that use 'lli' to execute >>>> the generated program. There seems to be something wrong in respect to >>>> lli. Can you run e.g. single_loop.ll with llvm-lit (-v) and show the >>>> error message. >>> >>> OK. This is the message. >>> >>> -------- >>> tomohiro at ubuntu:~/llvm/tools/polly/test/CodeGen$ llvm-lit -v >>> single_loop.ll >>> llvm-lit: lit.cfg:94: note:...
2011 Jun 09
0
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example
...q.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/loop_with_condition_nested.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/reduction_2.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/sequential_loops.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/single_loop.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/single_loop_param.ll Interesting. On what kind of Platform are you running this? Is it still Ubuntu 11.04? I assume it's an intel platform, but is it a 32-bit or 64bit? The test cases that are failing are the ones that use 'lli' to execute the generated...
2011 Jun 08
2
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example
...y :: CodeGen/loop_with_condition_ineq.ll Polly :: CodeGen/loop_with_condition_nested.ll Polly :: CodeGen/reduction_2.ll Polly :: CodeGen/sequential_loops.ll Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll Polly :: CodeGen/single_loop.ll Polly :: CodeGen/single_loop_param.ll Expected Passes : 102 Expected Failures : 29 Unexpected Failures: 11 make[3]: *** [tools/polly/test/CMakeFiles/polly-test] Error 1 make[2]: *** [tools/polly/test/CMakeFiles/polly-test.dir/all] Error 2 make[1]: *** [tools/polly/test/CMakeFiles/...
2011 Jun 10
0
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example
...> >> > >>>>> > >>>>> The test cases that are failing are the ones that use 'lli' to > execute > >>>>> the generated program. There seems to be something wrong in > respect to > >>>>> lli. Can you run e.g. single_loop.ll with llvm-lit (-v) and show > the > >>>>> error message. > >>>> > >>>> OK. This is the message. > >>>> > >>>> -------- > >>>> tomohiro at ubuntu:~/llvm/tools/polly/test/CodeGen$ llvm-lit -v > >&...
2011 Jun 10
0
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example
...gt; Certainly. >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The test cases that are failing are the ones that use 'lli' to execute >>>>>> the generated program. There seems to be something wrong in respect to >>>>>> lli. Can you run e.g. single_loop.ll with llvm-lit (-v) and show the >>>>>> error message. >>>>> >>>>> OK. This is the message. >>>>> >>>>> -------- >>>>> tomohiro at ubuntu:~/llvm/tools/polly/test/CodeGen$ llvm-lit -v >>>>>...
2011 Jun 10
2
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example
.... I tried this option with 'llc -march=x86' as follows, tomohiro at ubuntu:~/llvm/tools/polly/test/CodeGen$ opt -load /home/tomohiro/build/ lib/LLVMPolly.so \ -basicaa -polly-prepare -polly-region-simplify -scev-aa \ -polly-codegen \ /home/tomohiro/llvm/tools/polly/test/CodeGen/single_loop.ll \ | llc -march=x86 -o out.s && gcc -m32 out.s && ./a.out tomohiro at ubuntu:~/build$ then it successfully ran. So, on compiling llvm with Polly, is the suite of the tests are built as 64bit files as the default? >Cheers, > >James > >> -----Original Me...
2011 Jun 10
0
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example
...#39;llc -march=x86' as follows, > > tomohiro at ubuntu:~/llvm/tools/polly/test/CodeGen$ opt -load /home/tomohiro/build/ > lib/LLVMPolly.so \ > -basicaa -polly-prepare -polly-region-simplify -scev-aa \ > -polly-codegen \ > /home/tomohiro/llvm/tools/polly/test/CodeGen/single_loop.ll \ > | llc -march=x86 -o out.s&& gcc -m32 out.s&& ./a.out > tomohiro at ubuntu:~/build$ > > > then it successfully ran. > So, on compiling llvm with Polly, is the suite of the tests are built as 64bit > files as the default? Mh. We built several test...