search for: single_do_loop_scev_replace

..._do_loop_int_max_iterations > > ^ > > which was the other half for the gnutls fix. > > Can you check if the IR file specifies a target triple which doesn't > match the current platform? > > -Eli Eli, The polly testsuite only has a single file for CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll which has... ; RUN: opt %loadPolly %defaultOpts -polly-cloog -analyze %s | FileCheck %s ; RUN: opt %loadPolly %defaultOpts %s | lli %EatErrOnX86 ; RUN: opt %loadPolly %defaultOpts -polly-codegen %s | lli %EatErrOnX86 ; ModuleID = 'single_do_loop_scev_replace.s' target datalayout = &quot...

...Polly :: CodeGen/loop_with_condition_2.ll Polly :: CodeGen/loop_with_condition_ineq.ll Polly :: CodeGen/loop_with_condition_nested.ll Polly :: CodeGen/reduction_2.ll Polly :: CodeGen/sequential_loops.ll Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll Polly :: CodeGen/single_loop.ll Polly :: CodeGen/single_loop_param.ll Expected Passes : 102 Expected Failures : 29 Unexpected Failures: 11 make[3]: *** [tools/polly/test/CMakeFiles/polly-test] Error 1 make[2]: *** [tools/polly/test/CMakeFiles/polly-test.dir/all] Error 2 make[1...

...ce bugreport. I committed a fix in 166402 > Do you have any comments on failing tests we are seeing on x86_64-apple-darwin11? > > Failing Tests (5): > Polly :: CodeGen/do_pluto_matmult.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll I have some guesses for these, but it would be good to get run llvm-lit -v on these three test cases. > Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_equal.ll > Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_than.ll This is due to the use of an old isl version. I will change configu...

...; ^ >> > which was the other half for the gnutls fix. >> >> Can you check if the IR file specifies a target triple which doesn't >> match the current platform? >> >> -Eli > > Eli, > The polly testsuite only has a single file for CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll which has... > > ; RUN: opt %loadPolly %defaultOpts -polly-cloog -analyze %s | FileCheck %s > ; RUN: opt %loadPolly %defaultOpts %s | lli %EatErrOnX86 > ; RUN: opt %loadPolly %defaultOpts -polly-codegen %s | lli %EatErrOnX86 > ; ModuleID = 'single_do_loop_scev_replace.s' &...

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:43:42PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jack Howarth

...without issues in finding LLVMPolly.so. Thanks for fixing this so quickly. Do you have any comments on failing tests we are seeing on x86_64-apple-darwin11? Failing Tests (5): Polly :: CodeGen/do_pluto_matmult.ll Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_equal.ll Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_than.ll Are these darwin-specific or due to the fact that I am using isl 0.10 and cloog 0.17 rather than their the upstream development svn? Let me know if any of those merit a bugzilla of the...

...gt; Do you have any comments on failing tests we are seeing on x86_64-apple-darwin11? >>> >>> Failing Tests (5): >>> Polly :: CodeGen/do_pluto_matmult.ll >>> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll >>> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll >> >> I have some guesses for these, but it would be good to get run >> >> llvm-lit -v on these three test cases. >> >>> Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_equal.ll >>> Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_than.ll > &gt...

...: 1 Command Output (stderr): -- LLVM ERROR: Could not resolve external global address: stdout -- ******************** Testing Time: 10.01s ******************** Failing Tests (3): Polly :: CodeGen/do_pluto_matmult.ll Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll Expected Passes : 104 Expected Failures : 29 Unexpected Failures: 3 make: *** [polly-test] Error 1 When I try your command 'clang -Xclang -load ${POLLY_DLIB} ${FILE}.c -o ${FILE}.ll -S -emit-llvm -mllvm -polly -O0' if fails with the following errors: ------------------------...

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:43:42PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > >> > While testing llvm/polly svn on

...on_2.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/loop_with_condition_ineq.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/loop_with_condition_nested.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/reduction_2.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/sequential_loops.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/single_loop.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/single_loop_param.ll Interesting. On what kind of Platform are you running this? Is it still Ubuntu 11.04? I assume it's an intel platform, but is it a 32-bit or 64bit? The test cases that are failing are the ones that u...

...ld not resolve external global address: stdout > -- > > ******************** > Testing Time: 10.01s > ******************** > Failing Tests (3): > Polly :: CodeGen/do_pluto_matmult.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll > Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll That is interesting. Can you send me the individual error messages? Are you using a 32bit platform? > > Expected Passes : 104 > Expected Failures : 29 > Unexpected Failures: 3 > make: *** [polly-test] Error 1 > > When I try your command 'clang -Xclang -lo...

...fix in 166402 > >> Do you have any comments on failing tests we are seeing on x86_64-apple-darwin11? >> >> Failing Tests (5): >> Polly :: CodeGen/do_pluto_matmult.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll > > I have some guesses for these, but it would be good to get run > > llvm-lit -v on these three test cases. > >> Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_equal.ll >> Polly :: IslCodeGen/single_loop_param_less_than.ll Tobias, I am unclear on how I shou...

On 10/21/2012 11:46 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:35:49PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:

...ress: stdout >> -- >> >> ******************** >> Testing Time: 10.01s >> ******************** >> Failing Tests (3): >> Polly :: CodeGen/do_pluto_matmult.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll > > That is interesting. Can you send me the individual error messages? Are you using a 32bit platform? > >> >> Expected Passes : 104 >> Expected Failures : 29 >> Unexpected Failures: 3 >> make: *** [polly-test] Error 1 >> >> When...

On 01/16/2012 01:19 PM, Pieter Custers wrote: > I am new to LLVM and I've a question about the optimization passes and > in particular about the loop transformation passes. I've setup the LLVM > tool-chain with Polly installed. > > The following example is causing problems with me: > http://llvm.org/docs/Passes.html#indvars > > The input is a .c file with the

I am new to LLVM and I've a question about the optimization passes and in particular about the loop transformation passes. I've setup the LLVM tool-chain with Polly installed. The following example is causing problems with me: http://llvm.org/docs/Passes.html#indvars The input is a .c file with the following loops: # 01 Standard, N=100 for (i=0; i<N; i++) b[i] = a[i] + 5; # 02

...lly :: CodeGen/loop_with_condition_ineq.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/loop_with_condition_nested.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/reduction_2.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/sequential_loops.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_int_max_iterations.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/single_do_loop_scev_replace.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/single_loop.ll >> Polly :: CodeGen/single_loop_param.ll > >Interesting. On what kind of Platform are you running this? Is it still >Ubuntu 11.04? I assume it's an intel platform, but is it a 32-bit or 64bit? It is a little bit complicated....