Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "sincelooking".
2006 Feb 28
1
[LLVMdev] Re: Directly generating binary file
...ng to the requirements of the object file format.
>
> Alternatively, you could side step all of this and write your own .o file
> writer that doesn't use the MachineCodeEmitter interfaces at all. If this
> is easiest, go for it.
So far this looks the simplest approach. Especially sincelooking at
ELFCodeEmitter, I see quite a bunch of unimplemented methods.
> Note that *some* assembler format is useful for debugging, writting
> regression tests, etc.
Sure, I plan to have some format that will be output by disassembler, but
don't plan to ever read that format ;-)
- Volodya
2006 Feb 27
0
[LLVMdev] Directly generating binary file
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> I'm looking for a way to make the the "llc" tool (or any other tool),
> directly produce a binary file for some target.
ok
> The TargetMachine class has a method 'addPassesToEmitMachineCode', that's
> suitable for that, but that method also requires an instance of
> MachineCodeEmitter.
Actually, you probably
2006 Feb 27
2
[LLVMdev] Directly generating binary file
Hi!
I'm looking for a way to make the the "llc" tool (or any other tool),
directly produce a binary file for some target.
The TargetMachine class has a method 'addPassesToEmitMachineCode', that's
suitable for that, but that method also requires an instance of
MachineCodeEmitter.
The existing MachineCodeEmitter derived classes are either debug-only
(writing to