Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "simultaneouse".
Did you mean:
simultaneous
2007 Feb 07
2
CPU & motherboard for 100+ simultaneouse calls on Digium Quad E1 TE411p
...end/guide me of purchasing a resonably high performance
server system regarding processor(s) & motherboard (+ other compulsary
peripherals i.e. VGA, Soundcard). Mentioning up-to-date vendor+model will be
more helping
I've to use Digium TE411p Quad E1 card
signalling on the E1 is SS7
no. of simultaneouse calls is 100+
regards
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070207/d52985e9/attachment.htm
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
...ust 01, 2001 10:29 AM
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: unreliable and slow foxpro application while running from the
> share
>
>
> hello everybody,
>
> I'm searching for a cure for this.
> I have a share which holds a dos database
> (fox), which is accesed simultaneousely by
> many clients (win98). Performance is very
> poor (it takes 2 minutes only to open it)
> and, while I was playing with it, it became
> unreliable.
> I'm puzzled because on the old server it
> worked ok (it was a samba 2.0.4b/RH5.2). This
> one is samba 2.2.1a/RH7.1; s...
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
...: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
hello everybody,
I'm searching for a cure for this.
I have a share which holds a dos database
(fox), which is accesed simultaneousely by
many clients (win98). Performance is very
poor (it takes 2 minutes only to open it)
and, while I was playing with it, it became
unreliable.
I'm puzzled because on the old server it
worked ok (it was a samba 2.0.4b/RH5.2). This
one is samba 2.2.1a/RH7.1; samba is compiled
with --with-pam --...