search for: simplfied

hi all another simple question. i've written a dummy program so that you get the concept. (the code could be simplfied such that there are no loops. but lets leave the loops in for now.) z1<-function(w) { for (i in 1:w) { set.seed(i+6) ss<-0 for (j in 1:5) { set.seed(j+1+(i-1)*6) r<-rnorm(1) ss<-ss+r } list(ss=ss) } } check.1<-z1(3) check.1 the results is: $ss [1] -0.01516304 what i want...

Hi everyone. Ive part of a project that I need to refactor, and im having some difficultly deciding which path to take. Perhaps someone can help, I think its primarily a design question. A Spec consists of many Nests and many Parts. Nests contain Parts. Here''s what I have, which works well currently: --------------------------------------------------- class Spec <<

...RIPTION: Added Suggests field - Updated the example in frameApply CHANGES IN GMODELS 2.12.0 ------------------------- - Updated Greg's email address. - Add support for lmer (lme version 4) objects to ci(), estimable(), and fit.contrast() via code contributed by Randall C Johnson. - Add simplfied coefficient specification to estimable() based on a function provided by Randall C Johnson. It is now possible to do things like: estimable(reg, c("xB"=1,"xD"=-1)) instead of: estimable(reg, c( 0, 1, 0, -1)) which should make estimable() much...

...RIPTION: Added Suggests field - Updated the example in frameApply CHANGES IN GMODELS 2.12.0 ------------------------- - Updated Greg's email address. - Add support for lmer (lme version 4) objects to ci(), estimable(), and fit.contrast() via code contributed by Randall C Johnson. - Add simplfied coefficient specification to estimable() based on a function provided by Randall C Johnson. It is now possible to do things like: estimable(reg, c("xB"=1,"xD"=-1)) instead of: estimable(reg, c( 0, 1, 0, -1)) which should make estimable() much...

List: I have 2 related questions: (1) first I have x-y-z data, where x & y are the geographic locations of point values, z. I need to perform a normal score transform on the z-values and maintain their geographic location. So, how do I go from columns x-y-z to x-y-z-t (or x-y-t), where the t-values are the normal score transforms of the z-values? Can I use qnorm(ppoints(data)) to do

Andrew seems to have problems posting this to the list, so I''m bouncing this. Credits for the release should go to him :-) -- Jelmer We are proud to a announce a third alpha release of Samba 4. What''s new in Samba 4 alpha3 ============================ Samba 4 is the ambitious next version of the Samba suite that is being developed in parallel to the stable 3.0 series. The

In order to take advantages of Paolo's multi-queue virito-scsi, we need multi-target support in tcm_vhost first. Otherwise all the requests go to one queue and other queues are idle. This patch makes: 1. All the targets under the wwpn is seen and can be used by guest. 2. No need to pass the tpgt number in struct vhost_scsi_target to tcm_vhost.ko. Only wwpn is needed. 3. We can always pass

In order to take advantages of Paolo's multi-queue virito-scsi, we need multi-target support in tcm_vhost first. Otherwise all the requests go to one queue and other queues are idle. This patch makes: 1. All the targets under the wwpn is seen and can be used by guest. 2. No need to pass the tpgt number in struct vhost_scsi_target to tcm_vhost.ko. Only wwpn is needed. 3. We can always pass

We are proud to a announce another alpha release of Samba 4. What's new in Samba 4 alpha5 ============================ Samba 4 is the ambitious next version of the Samba suite that is being developed in parallel to the stable 3.0 series. The main emphasis in this branch is support for the Active Directory logon protocols used by Windows 2000 and above. Samba4 alpha5 follows on from the

We are proud to a announce a forth alpha release of Samba 4. What's new in Samba 4 alpha4 ============================ Samba 4 is the ambitious next version of the Samba suite that is being developed in parallel to the stable 3.0 series. The main emphasis in this branch is support for the Active Directory logon protocols used by Windows 2000 and above. Samba 4 is currently not yet in a

Hi, Redhat announced RHEL 5.1 on Nov 07, so hopefully CentOS 5.1 will be ready shortly. But I get kind of nervous of the arrival of 5.1. My problem is: I have hundreds Centos 5.0 boxes just finished installation and I will continue to install and upgrade hundreds more in next few months. With the arrival of Centos 5.1, I don't like to reinstall them anymore but continuous upgrade instead

I admit I am stuck. I am converting a legacy php site to ROR. The old site uses MD5, a security flaw waiting to happen. I upgraded to AAA and am adding code in the session_controller.rb file to see if crypted_password is blank. If it is, crypt and check the password against the old md5 version and write it in the new crypted_password field. Here is my code add on before the logged_in?: def

The biggest one is a fix for fstrim, and there''s a fix for on-disk free space cache. Others are small fixes and cleanups. The last three have been sent weeks ago. The patchset is also available in this repo: git://repo.or.cz/linux-btrfs-devel.git for-chris Note there''s a small confict with Al Viro''s vfs changes. Li Zefan (11): Btrfs: add pinned extents to

Hi Jeremy, all, Sorry this took so long, spent last week in Japan at OSDL conf then netconf. After several false starts, I ended up with a very simple implementation, which clashes significantly with your work since then 8(. I've pushed the patches anyway, but it's going to be significant work for me to re-merge them, so I wanted your feedback first. The first patch simply changes

Hi Jeremy, all, Sorry this took so long, spent last week in Japan at OSDL conf then netconf. After several false starts, I ended up with a very simple implementation, which clashes significantly with your work since then 8(. I've pushed the patches anyway, but it's going to be significant work for me to re-merge them, so I wanted your feedback first. The first patch simply changes

Hi Chandler, Philip, Mehdi, (and llvm-dev,) (this is partially a summary of some discussions that happened at the last LLVM bay area social, and partially a discussion about the direction of the CGSCC pass manager) A the last LLVM social we discussed the progress on the CGSCC pass manager. It seems like Chandler has a CGSCC pass manager working, but it is still unresolved exactly which

Hi all, These are the patches I'm planning to submit for 2.6.24. Comments gratefully accepted. Along with the usual cleanups and improvements are Jes' de-i386-ification patches, and a new "virtio" mechanism designed to be shared with KVM (and hopefully other hypervisors). Cheers, Rusty. Documentation/lguest/Makefile | 30 Documentation/lguest/lguest.c

Hi all, These are the patches I'm planning to submit for 2.6.24. Comments gratefully accepted. Along with the usual cleanups and improvements are Jes' de-i386-ification patches, and a new "virtio" mechanism designed to be shared with KVM (and hopefully other hypervisors). Cheers, Rusty. Documentation/lguest/Makefile | 30 Documentation/lguest/lguest.c