Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "simplerewrit".
Did you mean:
simplerewriter
2009 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] Removing SimpleRewriter (formerly SimpleSpiller)
On Jun 3, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Evan Cheng wrote:
> I vote for execution of SimpleRewriter.
Yeah, go ahead and axe it: Off with its head!
-Chris
>
>
> Evan
>
> On Jun 3, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Lang Hames wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is anyone still using SimpleRewriter (formerly known as
>> SimpleSpiller)? A quick check with the test suite suggests...
2009 Jun 03
2
[LLVMdev] Removing SimpleRewriter (formerly SimpleSpiller)
Hi all,
Is anyone still using SimpleRewriter (formerly known as
SimpleSpiller)? A quick check with the test suite suggests that it's
badly broken. If it's not being used I'd like to remove it as part of
my tidy-up of the register allocator.
- Lang.
2009 Jun 04
0
[LLVMdev] Removing SimpleRewriter (formerly SimpleSpiller)
I vote for execution of SimpleRewriter.
Evan
On Jun 3, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Lang Hames wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is anyone still using SimpleRewriter (formerly known as
> SimpleSpiller)? A quick check with the test suite suggests that it's
> badly broken. If it's not being used I'd like to remove it as part of
&g...
2009 Jun 04
0
[LLVMdev] Removing SimpleRewriter (formerly SimpleSpiller)
R.I.P. SimpleRewriter. If anyone needs it resurrected let me know.
This leaves LocalRewriter (the default) and the new TrivialRewriter,
which is for use only with the new in-place spilling framework. This
framework appears (if you squint just right) to be basically
functional now, but it produces awful code. If you w...
2009 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] Removing SimpleRewriter (formerly SimpleSpiller)
On Thursday 04 June 2009 13:57, Lang Hames wrote:
> R.I.P. SimpleRewriter. If anyone needs it resurrected let me know.
>
> This leaves LocalRewriter (the default) and the new TrivialRewriter,
> which is for use only with the new in-place spilling framework. This
> framework appears (if you squint just right) to be basically
> functional now, but it produ...
2009 Jun 05
0
[LLVMdev] Removing SimpleRewriter (formerly SimpleSpiller)
...keeps more state in the MachineFunction, rather than in
book-keeping structures like VirtRegMap. The work is in the very early
stages though.
- Lang.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:46 PM, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 04 June 2009 13:57, Lang Hames wrote:
>> R.I.P. SimpleRewriter. If anyone needs it resurrected let me know.
>>
>> This leaves LocalRewriter (the default) and the new TrivialRewriter,
>> which is for use only with the new in-place spilling framework. This
>> framework appears (if you squint just right) to be basically
>> function...
2009 Jun 05
1
[LLVMdev] Removing SimpleRewriter (formerly SimpleSpiller)
On Thursday 04 June 2009 19:03, Lang Hames wrote:
> The new spilling framework inserts spill code in-place (during
> register allocation) rather than deferring it using
> VirtRegMap/VirtRegRewriter. The goal is to enable techniques like
> iterative splitting to be implemented. It should also be a bit tidier
> as it keeps more state in the MachineFunction, rather than in
>