search for: simplely

Hello, My rails app is often not responding: see http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3299 Using latest lighttpd's freebsd port and rails 1.0 Thank your for your help ! _______________________________________________ Rails mailing list Rails-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails

Hello, I really can't say if it's rails or fastcgi related, but sometimes rails is not responding. See some output from ./script/process/reaper: ./script/process/reaper Restarting [22804] /usr/local/bin/ruby18 /usr/home/www/public/dispatch.fcgi Restarting [22806] /usr/local/bin/ruby18 /usr/home/www/public/dispatch.fcgi Restarting [22807] /usr/local/bin/ruby18

Are these 225 compile time regressions real? It sure looks bad! Ciao, Duncan. On 01/12/11 09:39, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results > > URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/ > Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4 > Name curlew.apple.com > > Run ID Order Start Time End Time > Current 380

Hi, I'm sure this one is very easy.... I am trying to write a function where one of its arguments has two posible (strings) values, defaulting to one of them if none is specified. My problem is that when evaluating the function the following warning is produced: "the condition has length > 1 and only the first element will be used" I've read the help page of if() but I

Really sorry I missed this. Just found it looking for something else in my inbox. I think we should support this but * We should still err on other identifiers ".cfi_startport bar" is invalid. * If I read the gas documentation correctly, the effect of "simple" is to skip the initial cfi instructions. We should test if that is the case and implement it too. Accepting and

libswfdec/swfdec_as_boolean.c | 49 ++++++++--------------- libswfdec/swfdec_as_boolean.h | 3 - libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.c | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_as_initialize.as | 4 + libswfdec/swfdec_as_initialize.h | 58 +++++++++++++++------------- libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++----

I'm trying to use ROCR to create a simple cutoff vs recall plot (recall at p) on the example ROCR.simple dataset: library(ROCR) data(ROCR.simple) pred <- prediction(ROCR.simple$predictions, ROCR.simple$labels) perf <- performance(pred, "rec") plot(perf) But R crashes on me on the last line. I'm using R 2.14.1, ROCR 1.0-4. ?Any ideas? Thanks in advance. -- Yang Zhang

The first one failed on a diff: ******************** TEST (simple) 'sse.expandfft' FAILED! ******************** Execution Context Diff: /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/tools/fpcmp: Compared: 1.139094e-07 and 1.159249e-07 abs. diff = 2.015500e-09 rel.diff = 1.738626e-02 Out of tolerance: rel/abs: 1.600000e-02/0.000000e+00 ******************** TEST (simple)

Hi, Is there a way to see what the default argument llc takes from clang/clang++ ? I'm debugging my backend with a very simple c++ program. Running through *clang++ -target myTarget -S simple.cpp -o simple.s * (bug does no show up) gives me different results from *clang++ -target myTarget -S -emit-llvm -o simple.cpp -o simple.ll* *llc simple.ll -o simple.s *(bug shows up) Just trying to

Hello all. I''m working on a program that uses both ActiveRecord and PDF::Writer. The latter requires the Transaction::Simple module, and ActiveRecord contains a "built-in" copy of Transaction::Simple - but the namespaces appear to clash, if I''m understanding things correctly. (I''m a bit of a ruby nuby, so please excuse me if I''m misunderstanding this

 Hello, I wrote a very simple openGL application, as below #include #include int main(int argc, char **argv) {   glutInit(&argc, argv);   glutInitDisplayMode(GLUT_DOUBLE | GLUT_RGB | GLUT_DEPTH);   glutCreateWindow("red 3D lighted cube");   printf("GL_VERSION = %s\n",glGetString(GL_VERSION) );   return 0; } Compiling it with Clang and adding -lglut option worked

I use the 'make TEST=simple' as a pre-commit test. I think that everybody should run these tests before committing to LLVM. On Dec 12, 2012, at 5:06 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > when I create the report, there are no failures in it. so maybe these are being filtered for known failures. > > On 12/12/2012 05:03 PM, reed kotler wrote: >> The first

Dear all, I recently started to see internal server errors when submitting perf results to lnt.llvm.org http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer/builds/1154/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/stdio nt /home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer/tests/nt/build/sample-0/report.simple.csv

The attached patch didn't fix it, but when I also changed another == to = a few lines further down it seemed to work. Jeremy On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote: > Jeremy Salwen <jeremysalwen at gmail.com> writes: > > I followed the LNT quickstart guide > > (http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html) on my debian

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 04:59:28PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > A call to drm_simple_encoder_init() initializes an encoder without > further functionality. It only provides the destroy callback to > cleanup the encoder's state. Only few drivers implement more > sophisticated encoders than that. Most drivers implement such a > simple encoder and can use

when I create the report, there are no failures in it. so maybe these are being filtered for known failures. On 12/12/2012 05:03 PM, reed kotler wrote: > The first one failed on a diff: > ******************** TEST (simple) 'sse.expandfft' FAILED! > ******************** > Execution Context Diff: > /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/tools/fpcmp: Compared: >

I followed the LNT quickstart guide ( http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html) on my debian machine, and it seems to have a problem running. When I consult test.log, every single test has a section like this # Pretend that the reference output was produced instantaneously. > cp /home/jeremy/hardware/llvm/test-suite/instant.txt > Output/sse.expandfft.out-nat.time >

Hi Thomas, Thank you for the patch. On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 04:59:28PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > A call to drm_simple_encoder_init() initializes an encoder without > further functionality. It only provides the destroy callback to > cleanup the encoder's state. Only few drivers implement more > sophisticated encoders than that. Most drivers implement such a > simple

Every so often, and it seems that it happens only when a call is in progress, all 24 Zap channels get reset. All channels are opened and then timeout. This causes the in-progress calls to terminate. There are no corresponding Red/Yellow alarms on wither the PBX or Asterisk although we do receive a fair amount of Blue Alarms. The Asterisk server is connected to a legacy PBX through a Digium

Hello, I am a beginner in LLVM development with the aim of writing a new optimization pass. But then before I could do that, I thought of writing simple passes. I could successfully implement the Hello pass as given in the doc. Then I wrote a simple Constant Folding pass - evaluate instructions of the form c=10+20 and replace all uses of c with 30. Only later did I realize that Clang does this