Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "simplecity".
Did you mean:
simplcity
2012 May 09
5
Unicorn doesn't play nice with Capistrano deployment?
I am having issues when using unicorn with a Capistrano deployment.
>From what I have been able to understand Capistrano uses a scheme in
wich every release is deployed inside the releases directory under a
unique name and if the transaction was successful, creates a symlink
named current that will point to that release.
So I end up with a deployment directory such as:
2004 May 13
1
asterisk-doc Conference Call - phase 2 :)
...into too much detail about every possible soft
phone/hard phone/voip provider)
Goals (first good docs, then maybe get published)
Submission process (mailing list? Website shows who's in charge of a certain
section?)
Focus (What do we want to focus on first? The intro and installation
chapters?)
Simplecity (Let's make sure a voip-newvie can get up and running, as long as
they've used Linux before and know how to use a text editor.)
Please feel free to add your suggestions.
Tentatively the conference will be scheduled for Sunday evening North
American time (I am EST, -0500 GMT). I'd lik...
2004 Sep 11
0
[LLVMdev] POST MORTEM: llvm-test changes
For the heck of it I tried upgrading to gcc 3.4.2 (from 3.3.3). It
didn't make a difference. So here are the failures for llvm-test. All
diffs are against the "native" output.
===================== MultiSource/Applications/sgefa
cbe failed differently from jit/llc. First cbe:
84c84
< One-Norm(A) ---------- 8.879153e+02.
---
> One-Norm(A) ---------- 8.879156e+02.
2004 Sep 10
2
[LLVMdev] POST MORTEM: llvm-test changes
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 20:16:37 -0700
Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 08:52:10 -0700
> Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote:
>
> > > I haven't got around to this yet but I will. The odds are good the
> > > problem is in a BSD system header file so I need to capture the
> > > preprocessed source.
> >
>
2004 Sep 11
2
[LLVMdev] POST MORTEM: llvm-test changes
On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 12:49, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> For the heck of it I tried upgrading to gcc 3.4.2 (from 3.3.3). It
> didn't make a difference. So here are the failures for llvm-test. All
> diffs are against the "native" output.
>
> ===================== MultiSource/Applications/sgefa
>
> cbe failed differently from jit/llc. First cbe:
>
> 84c84