search for: simplecity

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "simplecity".

Did you mean: simplcity
2012 May 09
5
Unicorn doesn't play nice with Capistrano deployment?
I am having issues when using unicorn with a Capistrano deployment. >From what I have been able to understand Capistrano uses a scheme in wich every release is deployed inside the releases directory under a unique name and if the transaction was successful, creates a symlink named current that will point to that release. So I end up with a deployment directory such as:
2004 May 13
1
asterisk-doc Conference Call - phase 2 :)
...into too much detail about every possible soft phone/hard phone/voip provider) Goals (first good docs, then maybe get published) Submission process (mailing list? Website shows who's in charge of a certain section?) Focus (What do we want to focus on first? The intro and installation chapters?) Simplecity (Let's make sure a voip-newvie can get up and running, as long as they've used Linux before and know how to use a text editor.) Please feel free to add your suggestions. Tentatively the conference will be scheduled for Sunday evening North American time (I am EST, -0500 GMT). I'd lik...
2004 Sep 11
0
[LLVMdev] POST MORTEM: llvm-test changes
For the heck of it I tried upgrading to gcc 3.4.2 (from 3.3.3). It didn't make a difference. So here are the failures for llvm-test. All diffs are against the "native" output. ===================== MultiSource/Applications/sgefa cbe failed differently from jit/llc. First cbe: 84c84 < One-Norm(A) ---------- 8.879153e+02. --- > One-Norm(A) ---------- 8.879156e+02.
2004 Sep 10
2
[LLVMdev] POST MORTEM: llvm-test changes
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 20:16:37 -0700 Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 08:52:10 -0700 > Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > > > > I haven't got around to this yet but I will. The odds are good the > > > problem is in a BSD system header file so I need to capture the > > > preprocessed source. > > >
2004 Sep 11
2
[LLVMdev] POST MORTEM: llvm-test changes
On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 12:49, Jeff Cohen wrote: > For the heck of it I tried upgrading to gcc 3.4.2 (from 3.3.3). It > didn't make a difference. So here are the failures for llvm-test. All > diffs are against the "native" output. > > ===================== MultiSource/Applications/sgefa > > cbe failed differently from jit/llc. First cbe: > > 84c84